|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-25-2007, 04:04 PM
|
#1 |
|
No new threads for you
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moneytown
Posts: 127
|
Trading #85
The Bengals are thinking about trading #85 after this season I think he is worth giving up a draft pick. If T.J. Duckett & Brandon Lloyd was worth a draft pick #85 is definietly worth a draft pick. He is a proven NFL star he has the numbers to prove it. I don't see him as a distraction do you see Synder moving on #85 and would it be a good move for the franchise?
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
10-25-2007, 04:13 PM
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Trading #85
While I'm definitely in the camp that says keep your draft picks, if we could acquire him w/out giving up too much, he'd be worth it. solid vet reciever, seems to have a good attitude, only this year he's been seen on the sidelines complaining about something.
Why do they want to trade him? |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:14 PM
|
#3 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Trading #85
i thought you were referring to Brandon Lloyd, no way Chad Johnson ends up in D.C.
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:14 PM
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Trading #85
we have enoguh receivers.... the combo of moss, randel el, cooley, and thrash is suffiecient... we need oline help.......
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:15 PM
|
#5 |
|
No new threads for you
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the boder line of hard times
Posts: 186
|
Re: Trading #85
no doubt, he's better than any receiver we could draft or have now.....if you put him on the other side of ARE or Moss, then they will be great #2's, i'd be for give a 3rd up for him......and Brandon Lloyd
__________________
IN MADDEN 08 IM THE MASTER AND THE RULER OF THE WORLD |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:15 PM
|
#6 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beaufort SC
Age: 45
Posts: 933
|
Re: Trading #85
I don't think I would warm to the idea of Ocho Cinco playing for us. I like him, he's a damn good WR and puts up great numbers, but that's a distraction that isn't needed on a team trying to identify it's self. We all know we have a team that capable of winning, were just not clicking yet. Bringing in more big names isn't going to do anything special for us, just ask Dan Snyder.
__________________
We are always superbowl contenders in March!!! HTTR!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:15 PM
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Trading #85
oh sh...
My BAD! I was thinking of #84. Disregard prior post. you should've said - ocho cinco (sp?) NO! |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:18 PM
|
#8 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Trading #85
i still say we are good enough at reciever.
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:24 PM
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 42
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Trading #85
Chad Johnson is great, and has one of the best work ethics of any receiver in the game. I would love to have him here. That said, he won't come cheap. There's NO WAY he's traded for anything less than a 1st round pick, and probably more. If we didn't have so many other issues to address, I wouldn't mind trading a 1st for him.
Is there a source for this info?
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:25 PM
|
#10 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Trading #85
Not to say he wouldn't be a GREAT addition, but seriously, let's try to work with the draft some. Let's look at a young WR in the second or third rounds and see how that works out.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:28 PM
|
#11 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Trading #85
This has got to be a joke. No way they trade Chad Johnson and if they do it'll be for at least 2 first round picks not for some scrubs.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:38 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:38 PM
|
#13 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 149
|
Re: Trading #85
I also heard about Ocho Cinco being dealt away, I think it was on either Rotoworld.com or Profootballtalk.com
Chad Johnson : Rotoworld.com - Chad Johnson Biography from Rotoworld.com read the days of 10/23 and 10/22
__________________
Section 102, Row 12... now I finally need to get a hold of one of those motorized coolers.. http://www.cruzincooler.com/ RIP#21 |
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:39 PM
|
#14 | |
|
No new threads for you
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the boder line of hard times
Posts: 186
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
didnt they get rid of the best WR in the NFL now, for a 4th round pick...(Raiders) no way it cost 2 first rounders.......please, when the organization and coach say the consider, its the best offer.......not what they want, but the best they can get...
__________________
IN MADDEN 08 IM THE MASTER AND THE RULER OF THE WORLD |
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2007, 04:41 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 42
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
Also, Moss was largely considered to be past his prime, plus a malcontent, and a lot of his success was credited to working with Culpepper and Carter. Obviously that's not the case, but perception is everything.
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
