![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Quote:
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 57
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Here are the facts IMO.... Our starting CB got hurt (Rodgers) so we have had to play our backup (Smoot) who is playing better than most starting CBs for other teams. Everyone complains about depth, but at Corner we have had it this year. Thank goodness for Smoot and Todd Collins as quality back-ups. Otherwise we would be 5-9 right now and thinking about next year. Smoot and Collins (again, quality backups) are a big part of our last two wins in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Quote:
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 42
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Smoot's filled in pretty damn well for Carlos Rogers, I have no complaints whatsoever. If everyone were healthy I'd still have Springs and Rogers as the #1 and #2, and have Smoot in on Nickel packages.
For being the #3 CB, he's filling in admirably. He also brings the "intangibles" to the team, namely a lot of fire, attitude and energy.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
I thought Smoot played a great game last night. He's not a probowl cb, but he's pretty solid most days. One of his best games last night though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Smoot did play great last night but 1 game does not an asset make. I think between Smoot being hurt a lot and getting burned a good bit I could never call him an asset. I dont think he's a liability either so I'd have to say neither.
And lets not get too carried away with smoot shutting down his receiver, the wind was the shut down factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Duck, irish.
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
I am confused why anyone would start a thread ripping on Smoot...maybe I watchd a different game.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Quote:
I'm not sure what that means either. I was just trying to play along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
I'm just trying to bump my post count. Mission accomplished.
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
At least you weren't trying to bump your reputation points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Liability as a #1 corner
Neither/Push as a #2 - i mean to say he is strictly average, nothing more nothing less as a #2 Asset as a #3/Nickel and Dime Db The only caveat to all of that is when he decides to have a breakout game every now and then. This is usually instigated by trash talking/friendlly banter with a specific wideout and he plays like he has a chip on his shoulders. Then he looks like a legit #1 guy. He also does possess good open field tackling skills to help out in the run game (a vital skill in a GW system). My final thought on Fred Smoot is that he is neither the problem nor the solution when it comes to our secondary or our defense as a whole. He is the essential filler meat to our squad and is a great locker room presence, so i'd like to see him stay a redskin unless we get someone who is a significant upgrade.
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Quote:
Winds which apparently nobody else saw in their version of last night's game.
__________________
Stop reading my signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Fred Smoot - asset, liability, or neither?
Smoot had a great game last night against a great receiver in Plax, he totally shut him down. Fred is definitely an asset to this team, but I still think he is best suited at the #3 CB position.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|