Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought part two

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2008, 11:19 PM   #1
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Please see my sig.
I thought we all had enough of the QB carousel when Spurrier was here? I'm definitely a fan not in favor of yanking ANYONE right now. The Eagles tried that shit last week and got blown out of the water. Come on now..
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:22 PM   #2
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
I thought we all had enough of the QB carousel when Spurrier was here? I'm definitely a fan not in favor of yanking ANYONE right now. The Eagles tried that shit last week and got blown out of the water. Come on now..
I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:10 PM   #3
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

$10 says that someone's head is going to spin 360 degrees and spit pea soup as soon as they see this thread has been bumped.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:11 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:14 PM   #5
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

oooo-line
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:44 PM   #6
DesertHog
Camp Scrub
 
DesertHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 18
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

The jury is still out on Campbell but he has shown enough progression this season to give him a break for now.
DesertHog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:35 AM   #7
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertHog View Post
The jury is still out on Campbell but he has shown enough progression this season to give him a break for now.
Huh? He really only had what 3-4 games where we can say he played like a pro-bowler. The other wins came on the back of Clinton Portis. Blame the O-line or play calling...I'm just calling a spade a spade.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 01:12 AM   #8
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
Huh? He really only had what 3-4 games where we can say he played like a pro-bowler. The other wins came on the back of Clinton Portis. Blame the O-line or play calling...I'm just calling a spade a spade.
Jason played at an outstanding level in four games, poorly in four games and okay in two games. That, to me, is reason enough to give him more time to prove himself. To those who think otherwise, please consider the following:

(1) Jason is a FAR superior QB than his predecessors. In the past decade or so I have suffered through Heath Shuler Gus Frerotte, Jeff George, Tony Banks, Shane Matthews, Patrick Ramsey, Danny Wuerfel, Tim Hasselbeck and a few others. Jason is, by far, the best of the bunch. The thought of going through another decade or so searching for a better option at quarterback makes me sick to my stomach.

(2) Quality free agent QBs don't grow on trees. In the past few years, how many teams have found a quality, young quarterback in free agency? Not many. New Orleans is the only team I can think of, and they took a MAJOR gamble in signing Brees. He signed a monster contract after coming off of an injury that threatened his career. How many great QBs are hitting the free agent market this offseason? None. Matt Cassel will likely hit free agency, but if JC doesn't please you, neither will Matt Cassel.

(3) Colt is NOT ready. Yes, we all know Colt Brennan has that "it" boy quality. But, that "it" factor doesn't mean squat. One day he might be a fine QB, but he's not there yet. He looked great in 2 games and struggled mightily in 2 others against 3rd stringers (many of whom have never played a single down in a regular season NFL game). If he struggled to move the ball and put up decent stats against guys who couldn't make other teams' practice squads, what in the world makes you think he'll excel against starting NFL defensive units? Yes, I am aware of the whole "he was drafted in the 6th round like Tom Brady" argument. However, not only is that argument unpersuasive, it's grade A tarded. So please spare me that garbage.

The point isn't that Jason is the best quarterback. The point is Jason is the best option we have right now, and he'll likely be the best option we have next season as well.

Last edited by Sheriff Gonna Getcha; 12-01-2008 at 01:17 AM.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 09:43 AM   #9
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Jason played at an outstanding level in four games, poorly in four games and okay in two games. That, to me, is reason enough to give him more time to prove himself. To those who think otherwise, please consider the following:

(1) Jason is a FAR superior QB than his predecessors. In the past decade or so I have suffered through Heath Shuler Gus Frerotte, Jeff George, Tony Banks, Shane Matthews, Patrick Ramsey, Danny Wuerfel, Tim Hasselbeck and a few others. Jason is, by far, the best of the bunch. The thought of going through another decade or so searching for a better option at quarterback makes me sick to my stomach.

(2) Quality free agent QBs don't grow on trees. In the past few years, how many teams have found a quality, young quarterback in free agency? Not many. New Orleans is the only team I can think of, and they took a MAJOR gamble in signing Brees. He signed a monster contract after coming off of an injury that threatened his career. How many great QBs are hitting the free agent market this offseason? None. Matt Cassel will likely hit free agency, but if JC doesn't please you, neither will Matt Cassel.

(3) Colt is NOT ready. Yes, we all know Colt Brennan has that "it" boy quality. But, that "it" factor doesn't mean squat. One day he might be a fine QB, but he's not there yet. He looked great in 2 games and struggled mightily in 2 others against 3rd stringers (many of whom have never played a single down in a regular season NFL game). If he struggled to move the ball and put up decent stats against guys who couldn't make other teams' practice squads, what in the world makes you think he'll excel against starting NFL defensive units? Yes, I am aware of the whole "he was drafted in the 6th round like Tom Brady" argument. However, not only is that argument unpersuasive, it's grade A tarded. So please spare me that garbage.

The point isn't that Jason is the best quarterback. The point is Jason is the best option we have right now, and he'll likely be the best option we have next season as well.
Stop with all the common sense, logic and level headed thinking! Don't you realize that Campbell has the ability to make his receivers catch balls that hit them right in the hands or numbers? Don't you realize that Campbell should be running this offense like Brady, Manning, etc? Why can't Campbell make Thomas and Kelly learn a new offense (while he is learning it) run perfect routes and catch every ball thrown their way? Wow man, you just don't get it do you?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 11:49 PM   #10
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

here is a crazy idea. how about let him be in the same system for more than one year?
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:07 AM   #11
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
here is a crazy idea. how about let him be in the same system for more than one year?
Crazy talk.

Bring in the next guy, if he doesn't turn out to be the next Brady or Manning by halfway through next season, toss him on the scrap heap too.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:08 AM   #12
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

When do I get my tryout for QB of the Redskins?

More importantly, when am I going to be called out for lacking heart?!
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:09 AM   #13
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
When do I get my tryout for QB of the Redskins?

More importantly, when am I going to be called out for lacking heart?!
When you lose, you don't have any heart.

When you win, you've got mad heart.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 01:17 AM   #14
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

In somewhat related news, I'd like to see Brennan move up to No. 2 on the depth chart...next season.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 01:27 AM   #15
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 53
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Jason Campbell does many things well and he is gaining experience. Hopefully coach Zorn will figure out how to maximize his talents to the fullest. JC works hard and he is talented so why not give him maximum support until he hits a clear and definite plateau. I just hope we don't sign him long term until the end of next season. That seems to be the window of time that makes the most sense with regards to assesing his progression as a player.

Great defenses are exposing this team right now, but I'm not sure what that even means? I kind of feel like the coaches aren't exactly sure either.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.00372 seconds with 11 queries