![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
I thought we all had enough of the QB carousel when Spurrier was here?
I'm definitely a fan not in favor of yanking ANYONE right now. The Eagles tried that shit last week and got blown out of the water. Come on now..
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
I realize you probably know my sig is dripping with sarcasm, but let me just confirm as much. I do not believe we should yank JC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
$10 says that someone's head is going to spin 360 degrees and spit pea soup as soon as they see this thread has been bumped.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
oooo-line
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 18
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
The jury is still out on Campbell but he has shown enough progression this season to give him a break for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Huh? He really only had what 3-4 games where we can say he played like a pro-bowler. The other wins came on the back of Clinton Portis. Blame the O-line or play calling...I'm just calling a spade a spade.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
(1) Jason is a FAR superior QB than his predecessors. In the past decade or so I have suffered through Heath Shuler Gus Frerotte, Jeff George, Tony Banks, Shane Matthews, Patrick Ramsey, Danny Wuerfel, Tim Hasselbeck and a few others. Jason is, by far, the best of the bunch. The thought of going through another decade or so searching for a better option at quarterback makes me sick to my stomach. (2) Quality free agent QBs don't grow on trees. In the past few years, how many teams have found a quality, young quarterback in free agency? Not many. New Orleans is the only team I can think of, and they took a MAJOR gamble in signing Brees. He signed a monster contract after coming off of an injury that threatened his career. How many great QBs are hitting the free agent market this offseason? None. Matt Cassel will likely hit free agency, but if JC doesn't please you, neither will Matt Cassel. (3) Colt is NOT ready. Yes, we all know Colt Brennan has that "it" boy quality. But, that "it" factor doesn't mean squat. One day he might be a fine QB, but he's not there yet. He looked great in 2 games and struggled mightily in 2 others against 3rd stringers (many of whom have never played a single down in a regular season NFL game). If he struggled to move the ball and put up decent stats against guys who couldn't make other teams' practice squads, what in the world makes you think he'll excel against starting NFL defensive units? Yes, I am aware of the whole "he was drafted in the 6th round like Tom Brady" argument. However, not only is that argument unpersuasive, it's grade A tarded. So please spare me that garbage. The point isn't that Jason is the best quarterback. The point is Jason is the best option we have right now, and he'll likely be the best option we have next season as well. Last edited by Sheriff Gonna Getcha; 12-01-2008 at 01:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
here is a crazy idea. how about let him be in the same system for more than one year?
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
Bring in the next guy, if he doesn't turn out to be the next Brady or Manning by halfway through next season, toss him on the scrap heap too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
When do I get my tryout for QB of the Redskins?
More importantly, when am I going to be called out for lacking heart?!
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
When you win, you've got mad heart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
In somewhat related news, I'd like to see Brennan move up to No. 2 on the depth chart...next season.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 53
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Jason Campbell does many things well and he is gaining experience. Hopefully coach Zorn will figure out how to maximize his talents to the fullest. JC works hard and he is talented so why not give him maximum support until he hits a clear and definite plateau. I just hope we don't sign him long term until the end of next season. That seems to be the window of time that makes the most sense with regards to assesing his progression as a player.
Great defenses are exposing this team right now, but I'm not sure what that even means? I kind of feel like the coaches aren't exactly sure either. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|