Wanted: Playmakers

Lotus · 04-19-2009, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehard

Let's see Royal's production with Orton? No defending Marshall huh? He'll have his fair share of balls behind bars sooner or later.

You argued that Randle El was more of a playmaker than Royal. You were wrong in this argument. That is all. No reason for me to mention Marshall.

Lotus · 04-19-2009, 05:56 PM

diehard, a person who admits that they are wrong is worthy of respect.

Someone who cannot admit that they are wrong is neither correct nor worthy of respect.

Your choice.

diehard · 04-19-2009, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lotus

diehard, a person who admits that they are wrong is worthy of respect.

Someone who cannot admit that they are wrong is neither correct nor worthy of respect.

Your choice.

I'm wrong for doing a lot of things and thinking this site is free of snipers was one of them. My opinion that Moss is a better WR than Marshall, Cooley is a better TE than Sheffler, or that there is a reason REL played a integral part in PIT winning SB XL is can be debated. A WR is only good as his QB. But maybe I'm way off base about that. Hats off to you and your mods.

GMScud · 04-19-2009, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehard

I'm wrong for doing a lot of things and thinking this site is free of snipers was one of them. My opinion that Moss is a better WR than Marshall, Cooley is a better TE than Sheffler, or that there is a reason REL played a integral part in PIT winning SB XL is can be debated. A WR is only good as his QB. But maybe I'm way off base about that. Hats off to you and your mods.

Diehard - obviously the issue of Jason Campbell is a polarizing one, especially on this website. I think the point the other posters are making is this topic is being discussed ad nausem in numerous other threads.

Sometimes people like to play thread police. Hell I'm guilty of it on occasion. Ultimately the mods are the only people who matter as far as thread-worthiness, and so far none of them have weighed in. So don't sweat it. Yet.

Lotus · 04-19-2009, 05:59 PM

Here's what you said:
Moss, Randle El, and Cooley are better than Cutler's Brandon Marshall, Eddie Royal, and Daniel Graham/Tony Sheffler

You have been demonstrated mistaken in this statement, in which you in fact did mention Royal.

I'm not going to argue with you again until you argue with integrity.

53Fan · 04-19-2009, 06:34 PM

On this board you're pretty much treated by the way you present yourself. New or old. If you're opinion is unpopular and the subject has been beaten to death, what kind of response would you expect? It's nothing personal, welcome to the board. From what I've seen, the merits of JC being our QB have been intelligently discussed numerous times. The problem is, one side decides to ignore facts instead of incorperating them into their argument to futher their opinion. Apparently the facts restrict the validity of their argument. I'll let you decide for yourself which side that is. Hopefully you're someone who is more interested in learning, than proving you're right, and is openminded enough to do so. Once again, welcome to the board and to answer your question, there are many things needed to get us over the hump but I don't believe changing QB's is one of them. One of these things would be to have enough patience for this offense which was just installed last year, to jell before making changes. Especially at a position as important as the QB.

Dirtbag59 · 04-19-2009, 07:40 PM

On a side note I hate people that call themselves playmakers. Those are the type that could literally have someone sitting on them and they'd still be waving their arms for the ball. Then they'd go to the sidelines and tell the QB how open they were.

SFREDSKIN · 04-19-2009, 07:44 PM

The only way the Campbell bashing will end, is if Thomas and Kelly get with the program and help Campbell out.

SmootSmack · 04-19-2009, 07:48 PM

I don't get what this thread is about?

GMScud · 04-19-2009, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't get what this thread is about?

Those were my exact words a few hours ago.

The purpose is blurred somewhere between Campbell's value, what will get us over the hump, and thread-worthiness. I dunno.

Trample the Elderly · 09-17-2009, 01:25 PM

Whoa! Hold Up!

You can't talk about play-makers and leave out . . . .

Reed "MFing" Doughty!

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 04-19-2009, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't get what this thread is about?

its already been answered to piss off GmScud

Eknox · 04-19-2009, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't get what this thread is about?

I guess the new guy wanted to make a thread...

tryfuhl · 04-20-2009, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I don't get what this thread is about?

I might bitch about people here being too whiny about the premise of threads but I'd rather slam my genitalia in a 400 level philosophy book than read these threads over and over.

duetsch215 · 04-19-2009, 07:59 PM

football is a team sport....therefore you must have all the elements to succeed. Taking Mark Sanchez is not going to put the Redskins into automatic SB contention. The OL line situation needs to be taken care of before the Redskins offense can expect to move the ball with all the "playmakers"

04-19-2009, 05:56 PM	#2
Lotus Fire Bruce NOW Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS Posts: 11,434	Re: Wanted: Playmakers diehard, a person who admits that they are wrong is worthy of respect. Someone who cannot admit that they are wrong is neither correct nor worthy of respect. Your choice. __________________ Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny

04-19-2009, 05:59 PM	#5
Lotus Fire Bruce NOW Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS Posts: 11,434	Re: Wanted: Playmakers Here's what you said: Moss, Randle El, and Cooley are better than Cutler's Brandon Marshall, Eddie Royal, and Daniel Graham/Tony Sheffler You have been demonstrated mistaken in this statement, in which you in fact did mention Royal. I'm not going to argue with you again until you argue with integrity. __________________ Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny

04-19-2009, 06:34 PM	#6
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Wanted: Playmakers On this board you're pretty much treated by the way you present yourself. New or old. If you're opinion is unpopular and the subject has been beaten to death, what kind of response would you expect? It's nothing personal, welcome to the board. From what I've seen, the merits of JC being our QB have been intelligently discussed numerous times. The problem is, one side decides to ignore facts instead of incorperating them into their argument to futher their opinion. Apparently the facts restrict the validity of their argument. I'll let you decide for yourself which side that is. Hopefully you're someone who is more interested in learning, than proving you're right, and is openminded enough to do so. Once again, welcome to the board and to answer your question, there are many things needed to get us over the hump but I don't believe changing QB's is one of them. One of these things would be to have enough patience for this offense which was just installed last year, to jell before making changes. Especially at a position as important as the QB. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

04-19-2009, 07:40 PM	#7
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 40 Posts: 14,750	Re: Wanted: Playmakers On a side note I hate people that call themselves playmakers. Those are the type that could literally have someone sitting on them and they'd still be waving their arms for the ball. Then they'd go to the sidelines and tell the QB how open they were. __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG

04-19-2009, 07:44 PM	#8
SFREDSKIN Living Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA Posts: 15,164	Re: Wanted: Playmakers The only way the Campbell bashing will end, is if Thomas and Kelly get with the program and help Campbell out. __________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth

04-19-2009, 07:48 PM	#9
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Wanted: Playmakers I don't get what this thread is about? __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

09-17-2009, 01:25 PM	#11
Trample the Elderly Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Three Chopt Virginia Age: 48 Posts: 2,906	Re: Wanted: Playmakers Whoa! Hold Up! You can't talk about play-makers and leave out . . . . Reed "MFing" Doughty! __________________ A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood.

04-19-2009, 07:59 PM	#15
duetsch215 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Richmond (School at ODU) Posts: 100	Re: Wanted: Playmakers football is a team sport....therefore you must have all the elements to succeed. Taking Mark Sanchez is not going to put the Redskins into automatic SB contention. The OL line situation needs to be taken care of before the Redskins offense can expect to move the ball with all the "playmakers"

Wanted: Playmakers

Locker Room Main Forum