![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Halfmoon, NY
Posts: 688
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
If you carefully review the logic of my statement, you'll find that is exactly what I'm NOT saying. You're reversing the syllogism, which is a fallible argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
Quote:
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 47
Posts: 901
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
We used to have to go to the Super Bowl to get all this fuss, miss those days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Halfmoon, NY
Posts: 688
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
Lifetime fans of the team, as in "As lifetime fans of the team, we don't want to see a name change." Maybe I'm being presumptuous, but I just assumed that no die hard fans ever want to see a name change. The bigger point I'm making is that to approach this topic from an objective standpoint rather than as Redskins fans may give us a different outlook, but that's not going to happen if people are more concerned with defending the team's nickname than discovering the true meaning of the word. Whether or not the term is offensive is hardly an argument. Redskin fans and many other people may not think it is, but lexicographers are pretty much in agreement. From Webster's to the American Heritage Dictionary, the term is labelled "offensive." I haven't been able to locate the definition through the OED, the be all and end all of English language dictionaries, but according to Wikipedia (admittedly not a credible source), the OED also considers the word offensive.
Look, I'm just being honest with myself; I can accept the opinion of objective experts who consider the term offensive while at the same time defend the team in keeping the name. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
Quote:
Quote:
Redskins is NOT a racial slur. Never was. No Professional team has been named a derogatory term because you're trying to sell stuff and present an inspiring image. How would that make any sense? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
I wonder what Bill Plaschke's credentials on the subject are?
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
Some people get out of bed in the morning just looking for a reason to be offended. I wonder if the people complaining about being offended have ever offended anyone? Wanting to change the name of my favorite football team every few years after the court has ruled against it kind of offends me. You can find something offensive in a lot of things if that's what you're looking for.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! Last edited by 53Fan; 09-18-2009 at 11:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: American Indians look to high court
Unfortunately, we do live in a society that if one is offended we have to listen. Look at a joke at work for instance, everyone could laugh at it, but if 1 person finds it offensive, then all of sudden, it is.
I just have a feeling that even if we win this battle, eventually we will lose cause we as a society are getting more and more "touchy". I personally feel this is a DUMB battle. The name should not offend anyone in my opinion, but it does cause some people just like to complain. They are miserable and they want others to be miserable. Fact is, by taking the name away, you are hurting MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of fans, while making a select few happy. Also, even though the Cowboys fans will laugh, most of them will be upset that they no longer have the "Cowboys vs Indians" rivalry. In summation, you are hurting more than you're helping by getting rid of the name. I would LOVE to pose the idea that the people trying to get the named abolished have to pay each and every redskins fan fair market value for all their redskins apparel and memorbilia. I bet this lawsuit would quickly disappear if they had to do that.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|