Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Campbell's numbers dont lie

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2009, 05:04 PM   #1
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgack View Post
The problem that I have with your analysis, SC, and I suspect many others are in the same boat here, is that you seem to think that Jason is an average or slightly above average QB, and that we merely need to 'address this in the offseason' as if this will resolve many of the team's issues.

And you're not the only one, plenty of people here are clamoring for Zorn and Campbell to be tossed overboard so we can begin our oh-so-beloved quest for the One True Player to deliver us from the arms of mediocrity. Oh, how we love the offseason courtships and dreams of free-spending our way to a championship.

Let me ask you this. Do you think Jason has "lost" the team? Don't you think every one of those guys is pulling for him and wants to see him succeed? After the way Snyder publicly humiliated the guy -- do you honestly think that it's going to be as simple as just replacing one cog in a machine with another, with no ramifications to the rest of the team? I sure don't. The quotes I read the clips I see of interviews tell me that these guys are behind Jason Campbell. All of them may not be with Zorn right now, but I don't see a lot of people preparing to throw JC under the bus. And they sure as hell aren't going to get excited about learning the quirks and habits and proficiencies and deficiencies of a new QB.

So ejecting Campbell and starting over WILL have consequences. We will regress. AGAIN. No new QB coming in here, short of an established veteran winner, is going to command the huddle and assert leadership over the team in their first season, either. You see Colt McCoy or Sam Bradford walking in here and saying "this is my team"? I don't think so.

No, I think what many of us are saying is that we should be capable of fielding a team that does not REQUIRE a quarterback to be a Tom Brady or Peyton Manning to compete at elite levels. Mark Rypien put up some good numbers for a few years, but was he an elite QB or a better-than-average QB who was a good fit in the system?

Kyle Orton is 4-0 this season. Is he elite? Or is he just being asked to be a competent QB most of the game and occasionally make some big plays?

Constantly chasing the holy grail QB is a waste of time. I don't have time to run the numbers, but I'm curious how often you really see a young highly touted QB prospect come in and turn around a team that is mired in mediocrity.

We need to fix a lot of other crap about this organization before we even think about looking for that miracle working QB.
Good point. But I will add to it. Because i know some will ignore the 3 words I bolded.

They will say Flacco, Matt Ryan or even pull Sanchez out their ---.

With all of these QBs they have these two important things that are a rookie QBs dream. A good running game and also a very stout if not great defense.

-Ryan has Turner and alot of other skilled players.
-Flacco has 3 formidable RBs and a great defense
-Sanchez has a good defense that came from the bmore defense and two good RBs on who is a a Sproles type player who excels running and catching the ball.

We dont have that. Our defense is becoming better but is not on the level of bmore or the jets and our only running back threat is nicked up and our o-line is not playing very well. Espeically when it comes to the run game.

Flacco might turn out to be the best of three. On NFL Network they were actually comparing Ryan to Brady when they played the other game. I was like WTF?

I think Ryan will regress this year. We all saw what happened when Sanchez had to put a team on his back against the Saints.

So there is no holy grail like my man said above. So we need to just hope JC manages the game and dont expect him to become Joe Montana overnight.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company

Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 10-05-2009 at 05:16 PM.
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 05:14 PM   #2
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08 View Post
So there is no holy grail like my man said above. So we need to jsut hope JC manages the game and dont expect him to become Joe Montana overnight.
Agreed there is no "holy grail" QB out there. However JC's play over the last two games (in snaps that the opposing D wasn't playing basically a prevent) isn't acceptable of a "game manager" or average QB. As I mentioned before he single-handedly could've been the cause of 8 turnovers in 2 games. As it is he caused 5.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 05:19 PM   #3
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
Agreed there is no "holy grail" QB out there. However JC's play over the last two games (in snaps that the opposing D wasn't playing basically a prevent) isn't acceptable of a "game manager" or average QB. As I mentioned before he single-handedly could've been the cause of 8 turnovers in 2 games. As it is he caused 5.
I think the fumbles are totally unacceptable. But I have a question. I might have missed something. Were the Bucs playing prevent in the 3rd quarter?

The other games when they said he scored during garbage time this applies. But as far as the last game (Buc) this doesn't really apply.

Do you mean the games against the Rams and Lions?
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 05:46 PM   #4
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08 View Post
I think the fumbles are totally unacceptable. But I have a question. I might have missed something. Were the Bucs playing prevent in the 3rd quarter?

The other games when they said he scored during garbage time this applies. But as far as the last game (Buc) this doesn't really apply.

Do you mean the games against the Rams and Lions?
I'm just speaking of the last two games. No Bucs prevent from that I saw. The late 4th qtr drive against the Lions (where JC improved his QB rating drastically for the game), they were in a soft Cover 4 the whole drive.

Outside of the two TD throws Sunday (which were very good and on consecutive plays), even on the TD drive JC didn't look good at all. On the two TD throws we don't know if it was a case of two great reads and plays by JC or if Zorn/Smith saw something in the D and dialed up great playcalls where JC just had to set and deliver, not read. A game manager or average QB cannot account for 3 TDs and 5 turnovers (again, lucky it wasn't 8) in two games.

EDIT: Also, I don't want anything I'm saying to be mistaken. I like JC, he's a quality young man and a good lead-by-example guy. I want him to be successful here, if he's not, based on what's likely available this off-season we're in trouble at the QB position.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 12:09 AM   #5
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08 View Post
-Flacco has 3 formidable RBs and a great defense

Flacco might turn out to be the best of three. On NFL Network they were actually comparing Ryan to Brady when they played the other game. I was like WTF?
Flacco has ok WR's and 3 pretty good RB's and a rebuilt OL, which make him even more formidable. Actually the guy that should get the credit for his development is Cam Cameron. To me, I would love to see him be our coach someday.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 08:02 AM   #6
Green1
Special Teams
 
Green1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 121
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
Flacco has ok WR's and 3 pretty good RB's and a rebuilt OL, which make him even more formidable. Actually the guy that should get the credit for his development is Cam Cameron. To me, I would love to see him be our coach someday.
I agree 100%
Green1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 08:09 AM   #7
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
Flacco has ok WR's and 3 pretty good RB's and a rebuilt OL, which make him even more formidable. Actually the guy that should get the credit for his development is Cam Cameron. To me, I would love to see him be our coach someday.
Cam Cameron, the same Cam that use to coach the Dolphins. The Cam that Dolphins fans booed for drafting Ted Ginn Jr. over Brady Quinn. Well he did manage to go 1-15 with the Fins. I guess he would be a upgrade over Zorn(not really). Week 4 lets fire the coach and we are 2-2 wow some fans never change and they want stability in the Redskins organization.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 04:42 PM   #8
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins89moss View Post
Cam Cameron, the same Cam that use to coach the Dolphins. The Cam that Dolphins fans booed for drafting Ted Ginn Jr. over Brady Quinn. Well he did manage to go 1-15 with the Fins. I guess he would be a upgrade over Zorn(not really). Week 4 lets fire the coach and we are 2-2 wow some fans never change and they want stability in the Redskins organization.
he said SOMEday not TOday
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 05:00 PM   #9
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

so we all agreee JC is an average to decent qb!!!

go skins!!
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 05:26 PM   #10
SkinDogg
Special Teams
 
SkinDogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 469
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Jason, tough game yesterday, and I know you're not long for this town. But wherever you go, and however it ends up, be safe in this game. I wish you nothing but the very best.
SkinDogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 08:51 PM   #11
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

I respect those last two comments
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 03:31 PM   #12
JLee9718
Impact Rookie
 
JLee9718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 573
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

I would hate to see the Skins waste a number 1 draft choice on a QB who might not pan out. Furthermore, you can't be patient with personnel who directly affect the QB's play. If these are the best O-Linemen we can get, then we need another set of eyes to watch the O-Line coach! Do they spend enough time in the weight room? They get pushed around quite a bit.
JLee9718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 12:28 PM   #13
Kalisto2010
Special Teams
 
Kalisto2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SF, Bay Area
Posts: 392
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Here's my personal take on Campbell. How come when he went down, and Collins stepped in and won 4 straight and led us to playoffs how come none of us were complaining about our O-line? We had no O-line problems when Collins was QB'ing. Collins not getting a chance to start is the biggest injustice since sending Warren Moon to the Edmonton Eskimo's. During his 4 regular season starts in Washington he has a QB rating of 106.4.

So he's my bold prediction. If we get a new coach this season, Campbell will be benched, Collins would start and the Skins will start winning again.
Kalisto2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 12:36 PM   #14
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalisto2010 View Post
Here's my personal take on Campbell. How come when he went down, and Collins stepped in and won 4 straight and led us to playoffs how come none of us were complaining about our O-line? We had no O-line problems when Collins was QB'ing. Collins not getting a chance to start is the biggest injustice since sending Warren Moon to the Edmonton Eskimo's. During his 4 regular season starts in Washington he has a QB rating of 106.4.

So he's my bold prediction. If we get a new coach this season, Campbell will be benched, Collins would start and the Skins will start winning again.
Well if I remember right Collins' start also coincided with changes made on the OL. We benched Todd Wade, slid Fabini inside and made Heyer the starting RT.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 12:49 PM   #15
Kalisto2010
Special Teams
 
Kalisto2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SF, Bay Area
Posts: 392
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well if I remember right Collins' start also coincided with changes made on the OL. We benched Todd Wade, slid Fabini inside and made Heyer the starting RT.
While I'm sure those adjustments helped, the x-factor was the 106.4 passer rating. His play completely re-energized our team.
Kalisto2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.14921 seconds with 11 queries