Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Sign Grossman

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2010, 12:34 PM   #1
joethiesmanfan
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

BigHairedAristocrat, why did you choose that name? Big Haired Aristocrat = immoral, corrupt, worthless, cowardly, and lazy.
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:03 PM   #2
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Does this spell the end of colt?
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:05 PM   #3
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

I cannot wait for a month from now when the draft is over and the focus sifts from "who we should take" to "Why we will be a contender". And I would love for once for the kool aid drinkers to be right.

I hate the effin offseason.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:21 PM   #4
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

I wouldn't be surprised what Polian actually meant is that since teams choose players based on an "IF...THEN" algorithm and teams try to be ready as many potential ways the order can play out, that's why they wouldn't be surprised. The order of the players selected is not bound by some faux-determinism. I wouldn't be surprised if Allen isn't surprised the Rams take Suh OR Bradford this draft because those are both plausible possibilities.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:27 PM   #5
Audi
Special Teams
 
Audi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
I wouldn't be surprised what Polian actually meant is that since teams choose players based on an "IF...THEN" algorithm and teams try to be ready as many potential ways the order can play out, that's why they wouldn't be surprised. The order of the players selected is not bound by some faux-determinism. I wouldn't be surprised if Allen isn't surprised the Rams take Suh OR Bradford this draft because those are both plausible possibilities.
No, he's referring specifically to players "rising" and "falling".

“The so-called ‘fallers’ didn't have that outstanding ability or had one major flaw,” Polian said.

Therefore we can insinuate that Matt Leinart was not taken in the Top 4 for a reason.
Audi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:24 PM   #6
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

This whole Shanahan likes Brennan thing has been way overblown. As of two weeks ago he hadn't even seen film of him playing in preseason games.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:27 PM   #7
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
This whole Shanahan likes Brennan thing has been way overblown. As of two weeks ago he hadn't even seen film of him playing in preseason games.
True, he's not going to challenge Campbell or anything, but he liked him enough to not cut him and let him in the "open competition", unlike Collins (thankfully).

I'd be fine with JC being backed up by whomever comes out ahead in the Rex/Colt battle.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:25 PM   #8
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

There are plenty of ways to build up the offensive line beside spending the 4th overall pick on an offensive lineman
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:36 PM   #9
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
There are plenty of ways to build up the offensive line beside spending the 4th overall pick on an offensive lineman
but we need 2 first 2 round picks this year bro
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:59 PM   #10
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
but we need 2 first 2 round picks this year bro
I would argue that if we could get a whole team of 1st round picks we need it. But it's not logical.

If Okung is not a good fit for the scheme Shanahan wants to implement and no one else is projected to be worthy of a #4 pick that are good in the zone blocking scheme then what do you do? The OL draft depth is huge. There are many players who will fit into Shanahan's scheme but not worthy of the #4 pick overall.

Trade up with the Rams get the QB we need, don't throw away draft picks though so in the second round we can get an OL. Hopefully we pick up more picks from other players we tendered and pick up more picks. Hopefully OL.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 02:06 PM   #11
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
There are plenty of ways to build up the offensive line beside spending the 4th overall pick on an offensive lineman
You've got to admit the argument of which position to draft has been as intriguing as it has been ongoing. It's a subject that has dominated fan message boards for months with both sides presenting formidable arguments both pro and con. It has certainly made for great discussion because a good case can be made for either side presented.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:49 PM   #12
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Grossman is terrible. End of discussion. He has to be the worst QB ever to QB a team to a Super Bowl. He's just awful. I honestly would've kept Collins. Even though he's old and slow w/ a noodle arm the guy seems to do well when called upon. Grossman can't handle the center exchage, can't read a defense and throws terrible INT's. He simply played his way out of Chicago. I hope nothing happens to JC.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:54 PM   #13
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Grossman is terrible. End of discussion. He has to be the worst QB ever to QB a team to a Super Bowl. He's just awful. I honestly would've kept Collins. Even though he's old and slow w/ a noodle arm the guy seems to do well when called upon. Grossman can't handle the center exchage, can't read a defense and throws terrible INT's. He simply played his way out of Chicago. I hope nothing happens to JC.
I forgot about that. You're right though, worse than Trent Dilfer.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 02:03 PM   #14
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Grossman is terrible. End of discussion. He has to be the worst QB ever to QB a team to a Super Bowl. He's just awful. I honestly would've kept Collins. Even though he's old and slow w/ a noodle arm the guy seems to do well when called upon. Grossman can't handle the center exchage, can't read a defense and throws terrible INT's. He simply played his way out of Chicago. I hope nothing happens to JC.
Damn for a moment I thought you were refering to JC.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 02:07 PM   #15
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Damn for a moment I thought you were refering to JC.
Rabach can't handle the center/QB exchange...snaps it into the ground half the time.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.70654 seconds with 11 queries