![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
The offense and passing game were imo out of sync Sunday night, both from an execution and gameplanning standpoint.
I though the instances of confusion and resulting wasted time outs were evidence of this. But, that's gonna happen with so much 'newness' on the offense. So although the passing game didn't look sharp they will get better. Also, we played a very good defense last night, it reminds me of the start the Texans offense had against the Jets last year. Galloway was only targeted once and he was open on a deep comeback route but McNabb was getting pressured, (it would be a tough throw to make for any QB). Galloway could have been open all day for all we know. Armstrong had imo a bad game he was targeted 5 times (2 in the RZ) and had 1 catch. I recall McNabb(under duress i think) threw a bounce pass on crossing route where Armstrong was open. And Armstrong had a chance on 2 well thrown stutter fade routes. I think the coaching staff showed they had faith in him by targeting him 5 times and don't think they would or should give up on him after 1 game. Roydell was targeted once on 3rd down late in the game and was open but McNabb (under duress) missed him with another bounce pass. Devin Thomas was an BEAST on Kick Return and i value his contributions there as more valueable then trying him out on offense when we already know that the coaching staff don't consider him as one of the top 4 WR options on this team. I wouldn't mind seeing him on specfic designed plays just for him-like that screen to Moss, I would love to see wild child catch a couple screens and run a couple of 9 routes. But start opposite Moss nah i'll pass. I want to see more Fred Davis though. Not 1 target for him the whole game and very few double TEs passing sets. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
Absolutely...teams like the Pats and Colts toss the ball up knowing full well that it will be either caught or result in an interference penalty.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I'm not sure we can fairly judge our WRs offer until McNabb gets up to speed in the offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
So good you had to post it twice eh
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't my post, I was holding it for a friend.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
A Dirtbag classic.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I wonder if the chance to go against Cincy twice a year had something to do with the decision. In the end, TJ could choose whoever he wanted and still get a top dollar salary, nice situation to be in no matter what your line of work
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Well, he was going to get top dollar salary no matter where he landed courtesy of the Seahawks. I think you are right, he prob wanted to go against Cincy twice a year, and I'm sure experts picking the Ravens to go to the SB went into that decision.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|