Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


(Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2010, 11:41 AM   #1
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

The offense and passing game were imo out of sync Sunday night, both from an execution and gameplanning standpoint.
I though the instances of confusion and resulting wasted time outs were evidence of this.
But, that's gonna happen with so much 'newness' on the offense.
So although the passing game didn't look sharp they will get better.
Also, we played a very good defense last night, it reminds me of the start the Texans offense had against the Jets last year.

Galloway was only targeted once and he was open on a deep comeback route but McNabb was getting pressured, (it would be a tough throw to make for any QB).
Galloway could have been open all day for all we know.

Armstrong had imo a bad game he was targeted 5 times (2 in the RZ) and had 1 catch.
I recall McNabb(under duress i think) threw a bounce pass on crossing route where Armstrong was open.
And Armstrong had a chance on 2 well thrown stutter fade routes.

I think the coaching staff showed they had faith in him by targeting him 5 times and don't think they would or should give up on him after 1 game.

Roydell was targeted once on 3rd down late in the game and was open but McNabb (under duress) missed him with another bounce pass.

Devin Thomas was an BEAST on Kick Return and i value his contributions there as more valueable then trying him out on offense when we already know that the coaching staff don't consider him as one of the top 4 WR options on this team.

I wouldn't mind seeing him on specfic designed plays just for him-like that screen to Moss, I would love to see wild child catch a couple screens and run a couple of 9 routes.
But start opposite Moss nah i'll pass.

I want to see more Fred Davis though.
Not 1 target for him the whole game and very few double TEs passing sets.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 11:44 AM   #2
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
IMO as good as a catch; just like Rak's holding plenty. If your talent is good enough to draw penalty and it helps move the ball or allows your team to win that is talent and a accommodate in this NFL (sadly).

Absolutely...teams like the Pats and Colts toss the ball up knowing full well that it will be either caught or result in an interference penalty.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:11 AM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

I'm not sure we can fairly judge our WRs offer until McNabb gets up to speed in the offense.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:46 AM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

So good you had to post it twice eh
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:56 AM   #5
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
So good you had to post it twice eh
I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't my post, I was holding it for a friend.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 12:16 PM   #6
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't my post, I was holding it for a friend.
A Dirtbag classic.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 12:18 PM   #7
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I don't know what you're talking about. It wasn't my post, I was holding it for a friend.
Son, you need to put the keyboard down and step away

__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:31 AM   #8
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

I wonder if the chance to go against Cincy twice a year had something to do with the decision. In the end, TJ could choose whoever he wanted and still get a top dollar salary, nice situation to be in no matter what your line of work
CRedskinsRule is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:36 AM   #9
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I wonder if the chance to go against Cincy twice a year had something to do with the decision. In the end, TJ could choose whoever he wanted and still get a top dollar salary, nice situation to be in no matter what your line of work
Well, he was going to get top dollar salary no matter where he landed courtesy of the Seahawks. I think you are right, he prob wanted to go against Cincy twice a year, and I'm sure experts picking the Ravens to go to the SB went into that decision.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.37201 seconds with 11 queries