Would You Rather...

WaldSkins · 09-26-2010, 08:32 PM

Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Blache and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?

As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have?

rypper11 · 09-26-2010, 08:34 PM

Why not McNabb/Shanny but with Blache? I know people didn't like his "boring" defenses, but they didn't look this bad week after week.

DynamiteRave · 09-26-2010, 08:35 PM

I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.

WaldSkins · 09-26-2010, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DynamiteRave

I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh.

HA, that really wasnt a option.

Bushead · 09-26-2010, 08:36 PM

I think the switch will be really beneficial over time, but it will also take time to get there.

DynamiteRave · 09-26-2010, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

HA, that really wasnt a option.

Then Haslett/McNabb. McNabb at least puts us in a position to win. JC is doing in Oak what he should've been doing here. Riding the pine.

Chico23231 · 09-26-2010, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Zorn and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb?

As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have?

K, its not that bad. Zorn and Campbell was pretty f*cking bad. Ill take McNabb and Haslett

diehard · 09-26-2010, 08:43 PM

Good question. McNabb and Kyle are definite upgrades. What Mike, Kyle, and Jim need to realize is that what was successful for other teams isn't a determination to totally scrap what we already do well. Let's see more power running, working some stretch plays in. Need I mention the defense? You can play more aggressively (exotic blitzes) while preserving the 4-3 schemes.

chewman · 09-26-2010, 08:44 PM

doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck

Chico23231 · 09-26-2010, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chewman

doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck

+100

SouperMeister · 09-26-2010, 08:48 PM

Go back to a 4-3 which fits our personnel. We have the best 3-technique lineman in the league. Somewhere, Greg Blache is laughing his ass off.

GMScud · 09-26-2010, 08:50 PM

Haslett and McNabb for sure, but on the condition that Shanahan gets Haslett to stop effing around with this BS defense.

Ruhskins · 09-26-2010, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

Haslett and McNabb for sure, but on the condition that Shanahan gets Haslett to stop effing around with this BS defense.

I'd rather have J. Gray or Mike Zimmer along with a 4-3 defense along with McNabb.

SFREDSKIN · 09-26-2010, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I'd rather have Jim Gray or Mike Zimmer along with a 4-3 defense along with McNabb.

Did you mean Jerry Gray? Who they should have promoted to DC.

WaldSkins · 09-26-2010, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chico23231

K, its not that bad. Zorn and Campbell was pretty f*cking bad. Ill take McNabb and Haslett

Blache and Campbell's first 3 games were 2-1.

Haslett and McNabbs's first 3 games are 1-2.

09-26-2010, 08:32 PM	#1
WaldSkins Playmaker Join Date: May 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 41 Posts: 2,726	Would You Rather... Pretty simple question: Would you rather take a team with Blache and Campbell or Haslett and McNabb? As much as I like the addition of Mcnabb to this team, I cant remember a time when the defense was this bad. So which would you rather have? __________________ "I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown Last edited by WaldSkins; 09-26-2010 at 09:18 PM.

09-26-2010, 08:34 PM	#2
rypper11 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Raleigh, NC Posts: 1,228	Re: Would You Rather... Why not McNabb/Shanny but with Blache? I know people didn't like his "boring" defenses, but they didn't look this bad week after week. __________________ Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.

09-26-2010, 08:35 PM	#3
DynamiteRave Living Legend Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Washington DC Age: 38 Posts: 16,867	Re: Would You Rather... I'd really almost prefer Zorn and McNabb at this rate. Sigh. __________________ Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.

09-26-2010, 08:36 PM	#5
Bushead Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Richmond, VA Posts: 782	Re: Would You Rather... I think the switch will be really beneficial over time, but it will also take time to get there.

09-26-2010, 08:43 PM	#8
diehard The Starter Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Norfolk, Va (OV) Posts: 1,566	Re: Would You Rather... Good question. McNabb and Kyle are definite upgrades. What Mike, Kyle, and Jim need to realize is that what was successful for other teams isn't a determination to totally scrap what we already do well. Let's see more power running, working some stretch plays in. Need I mention the defense? You can play more aggressively (exotic blitzes) while preserving the 4-3 schemes. __________________ *'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'*

09-26-2010, 08:44 PM	#9
chewman Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Pasadena,MD Posts: 140	Re: Would You Rather... doesn't matter what combo you take we would still suck

09-26-2010, 08:48 PM	#11
SouperMeister Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 60 Posts: 3,419	Re: Would You Rather... Go back to a 4-3 which fits our personnel. We have the best 3-technique lineman in the league. Somewhere, Greg Blache is laughing his ass off.

09-26-2010, 08:50 PM	#12
GMScud Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 12,626	Re: Would You Rather... Haslett and McNabb for sure, but on the condition that Shanahan gets Haslett to stop effing around with this BS defense. __________________ Tardy

Would You Rather...

Locker Room Main Forum