![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
I dont hate grossman as much as I hate whichever shanahan decided let him pass so much in the first place. The eagles run defense is among the Worst in the league while their pass defense is one of the best. The run to pass ratio should have been 2:1
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
or keep him after the second INT.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
How good does Jason Campbell look right about now? Better than Grossman and Beck IMO.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
Agree. Back up QBs always have a bit of an advantage when subbing in. Starting for the team after the opponent has time to gameplan against you is a whole different ball game. Yet I still think MS needs to make the call to start Beck ASAP.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
I wish Shanahan would have had the balls to keep Campbell the way Harbaugh kept A. Smith. It would have made our draft strategy for the past two offseasons much better if we had not wasted picks on McNabb. Oh well, could've, should've, would've.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Easy to say. They were stacking up against our run and it was going nowhere. Couple that with two starting OLs out for the game. Again, easy to say.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Not soon enough for me. I've seen plenty of Campbell and enough of Beck. Campbell is better.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
Rex stunk but I suspect he will start next week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
I have a hard time giving a feck what Jason Butterfingers Campbell is doing today.
When he was here, he sucked.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,059
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
Quote:
He just wasn't good, he rarely lost games for us, he rarely won them too. He didn't throw a lot of picks, but he did take sacks...he was coached by Gibbs who told him to throw it away or take a sack instead of throwing into double coverage the way Grossman does chronically. Campbell is a game manager and that is all, ironically, that is what we kind of need right now...of course better that that would be good too, which is what they thought they'd get with McNabb...if Beck can get to Campbell's level, I'd say we got a steal from the Ravens when we got him. I sure hope Beck can manage a game without turning the damn ball over so much they way Grossman does
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
Unless Ryan Kerrigan turns into a year-in year-out All Pro, (and I think he could), not taking a QB in the last draft might be legitimately questioned.
Especially if there's still not going to be a QB worth taking next year. How long can you go without even starting to look for your quarterback of the future? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
Quote:
This year's top prospects are much higher quality guys IMO. Much better.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
agree 100%
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
|
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread
Quote:
Newton is lighting it up and Dalton has been very effective... leading the Bengals to a 4-2 record. Ponder looked decent in preseason as well... can't judge this class yet, really, but they aren't terrible I know that and I know there is at least 2 that are better than what we have now. Kerrigan was the right choice... but right now, I think I'd take Dalton over Hankerson, Gomes, and Hurd combined.... that's just me.
__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.” - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|