Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Rock or Nemo?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: You're Joe Gibbs, there's one RB roster spot left, who gets the spot?
Nemo Broughton 46 80.70%
Rock Cartwright 11 19.30%
Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-17-2005, 01:14 PM   #1
BossHog
Registered User
 
BossHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 665
Re: Rock or Nemo?

I think Nemo was brought into compete for whatever position Sellers currently has. In my opinion, Nemo hasn't quite knocked off the Rock or penalty-prone Sellers as H-back, RB, or special teamer. Isn't it amazing how some plays look so good when the ball carrier waits for his blocks (or possibly he's slower than his lineman)? Nemo's last name does look kind of sweet on Madden though. If Nemo fumbles the ball again he's get the ax along with Combs, period.

Last edited by BossHog; 08-17-2005 at 01:32 PM.
BossHog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 01:16 PM   #2
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: Rock or Nemo?

Yeah, I vote for getting rid of a safety.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 01:30 PM   #3
BrudLee
Playmaker
 
BrudLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
Re: Rock or Nemo?

Nemo moves piles - and he's cheaper than Rock.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.
BrudLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 02:37 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
Re: Rock or Nemo?

Sellers has been moved to TE.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 02:46 PM   #5
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Rock or Nemo?

rock was 240 before gibbs told him to lose weight since he doesn't use FBs.

I really rather keep both if rock keeps playing like that.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 02:55 PM   #6
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: Rock or Nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
rock was 240 before gibbs told him to lose weight since he doesn't use FBs.

I really rather keep both if rock keeps playing like that.
Gibbs never told him to lose weight. That was a decision Cartwright made all by himself.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 08:29 PM   #7
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Rock or Nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5
Gibbs never told him to lose weight. That was a decision Cartwright made all by himself.
I don't think so, the coaches told him they don't use FBs at all etc and when he showed up lighter they sasid it was a great sign of how dedicated he was, so its obvious they wanted him slimmer whether they said it beforehand or not.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 08:03 AM   #8
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: Rock or Nemo?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
I don't think so, the coaches told him they don't use FBs at all etc and when he showed up lighter they sasid it was a great sign of how dedicated he was, so its obvious they wanted him slimmer whether they said it beforehand or not.
"I knew with Coach Gibbs that my only shot at playing was as a running back," Cartwright said. "They don't need a fullback. So I kind of took it upon myself to lose the weight, come in to camp and show them I belong here."
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 03:31 PM   #9
everest3k
Camp Scrub
 
everest3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
Nemo
__________________
Go Skins...
everest3k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 03:33 PM   #10
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 4,628
Re: Rock or Nemo?

My loyalty button would say keep Rock. however, in needing a bruising back, Nemo fits the mold. Rock is a proven Special Teamer, while Nemo is a rookie still getting his feet wet. Nemo is cheaper, but not enough of a difference to using money as a deciding factor.

I too vote rid of safety, keep both Rock and Nemo for Special Teams, let Rock be the 3rd down back, Nemo short yardage back, and be done with it.

If i was picking today, I'd take Rock...
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 03:38 PM   #11
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
Re: Rock or Nemo?

Nemo looked great vs Carolina, and we say not to judge someone by one game. HOWEVER, to be a short yardage back, Rock is just too small. Period. If he was a full time type back and good enough to compete there, I'd give him more of a chance, but as a short yardage back, I dont think he's quite there.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 04:26 PM   #12
jacobyfan
Special Teams
 
jacobyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 47
Posts: 172
Re: Rock or Nemo?

I'm not ready to vote yet. I want to see if Nemo can continue to catch the ball and make sure he doesn't have fumble problems. He looks good running the ball. I'd give him the edge if it was my decision.
jacobyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 05:11 PM   #13
Monksdown
The Starter
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
Re: Rock or Nemo?

We drafted Nemo for the short yardage 3rd down play. Or when we are trying to punch it in the endzone. I could care less who of our 3rd stringers catches the ball, when one of them weighs 30 more lbs than the other, and knows how to use it.

The touchdown, and the long run were not what impressed me with nemo against the panthers. One of the plays he got stuffed after like 3 yards. After someone wrapped him up, he kept pushing. Then more defenders began to throw their weight on. The last piece of him that I saw on that play before the whistle, was his stocky calves holding up the pile, and leaning forward. This guy must squat a ton. I love him.
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 05:12 PM   #14
Monksdown
The Starter
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
Re: Rock or Nemo?

that being said, he needs to face starters to really evaluate him
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2005, 07:21 PM   #15
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,815
Re: Rock or Nemo?

I've really liked Rock and the way he's stepped into multiple positions when needed, but from what I've seen and heard about Nemo, I think Gibbs could have found nicer diamond in the rough.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.65842 seconds with 12 queries