Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2010, 02:47 PM   #1
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Not a chance.

He's our second or third best WR.

He hasn't done much this preseason...because he hasn't been put on the field. I really think he's a lock to make it, that's why Shanahan has been featuring Armstrong, Williams, Wade, Austin and Banks in the preseason. He has some tough choices to make at the back end of the WR depth chart. Armstrong has stepped up. But beyond that, there are at least 4 good candidates for the final two spots.

Thomas wasn't even on the field for the Jets game...of course he's been quiet. He's supposed to play a lot for the final game, but I don't see how his roster spot is up in the air.
I mean you could be right, but I think he is on serious thin ice.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:18 PM   #2
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,553
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

from Matt Terl's blog
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:28 PM   #3
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
from Matt Terl's blog
Is that from this year? Do the vets STILL make MK carry their helmets?
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:54 PM   #4
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz View Post
Is that from this year? Do the vets STILL make MK carry their helmets?
the other helmet is for his knee
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:21 PM   #5
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

i dont think banks is the lock to make the team so many people think he is. I honestly think Austin has a much better shot of making the roster.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:30 PM   #6
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 56
Posts: 1,559
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

This discussion of basically fringe WRs is why I will watch some of the Thursday night game this week. It really think that Skins/Cardinals game will be a one game tryout for some of these guys to help Shannahan make his final decisions. I think Banks needs to run some pass routes, catch some balls on offense and not fumble/muff some punts. Devin Thomas needs to catch everything within 5 yards of him! Armstrong is just fun to watch, period! I would love to see him become our number 2 WR!
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:49 PM   #7
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,743
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Thomas is our biggest WR, most physical, and he returns kicks.

I just don't see him getting the axe.

Given the team's patience with Kelly, I would really be surprised to see Thomas get dropped.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:53 PM   #8
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Thomas is our biggest WR, most physical, and he returns kicks.

I just don't see him getting the axe.

Given the team's patience with Kelly, I would really be surprised to see Thomas get dropped.

Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job?

I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:57 PM   #9
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job?

I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably.
Terrible? I'd say average
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:00 PM   #10
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,743
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job?

I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably.
Because he's been listed on the depth chart as the main KR since camp opened. He's certainly in the mix.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 05:05 PM   #11
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,759
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job?

I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably.
I agree, he is below average at returning kicks.
He is big, but I would NOT call him physical by any stretch.
What I am noticing his main problem as WR running routes is he can not maintain a high speed when running square-in patterns. It might be his weak knees, but he is fine run a deep route or running in a straight line, but if he has to run a 90 degree corner in his route he has to slow down. Which might explain the whole not getting enough separation from DB issue.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:54 PM   #12
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Thomas is our biggest WR, most physical, and he returns kicks.

I just don't see him getting the axe.

Given the team's patience with Kelly, I would really be surprised to see Thomas get dropped.
Like him on special teams as much as the next guy, but it's not good when a really on the bubble guy can't even get on the field.

Kelly, I think, would have been a very easy cut -- it's not like he has a great shot to make the team next year. But if Shanny already knows Thomas is gone, it makes more sense to not dump Kelly at the same time.

With that said, every spot is open after Moss and Armstrong. Still skeptical that Galloway or Wade or Roydell Williams have a chance to make it, but this team does have more invested in both Banks and Austin than Thomas. I think that's a really bad sign for Thomas, especially now that we know Kelly is going to open next offseason with the team.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:44 PM   #13
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Like him on special teams as much as the next guy, but it's not good when a really on the bubble guy can't even get on the field.
maybe he wasn't on the field because the coaching staff knows he's on the team and they need to evaluate the other WRs.

Quote:
With that said, every spot is open after Moss and Armstrong. Still skeptical that Galloway or Wade or Roydell Williams have a chance to make it, but this team does have more invested in both Banks and Austin than Thomas. I think that's a really bad sign for Thomas, especially now that we know Kelly is going to open next offseason with the team.
Moss, Galloway and Thomas are locks. Armstrong has played his way on the team. With Kelly on IR, it's probably going to be Roydell and Austin if they go with 6 WR. Thursday night is huge for those two guys.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:12 PM   #14
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Apparently Kelly's initial diagnosis was incorrect, they had it as a grade 1 strain.. 2nd opinion came up with grade 2

of course it could've just gotten worse
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:22 PM   #15
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 46
Posts: 5,829
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

He was number 12 last year according to QB rating. With Warner retired he can easily move up to 11. Ironically JC was only 3 spots removed from McNabb.

NFL Stats: by Player Category
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.69413 seconds with 10 queries