RGIII Named Starter

[Defensewins]

Sexy Rexy's reaction when he asked coach Shanahan what are the chances if he will ever be the the starter again.

Dumb and Dumber 'There's a Chance' - YouTube

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by Defensewins

Sexy Rexy's reaction when he asked coach Shanahan what are the chances if he will ever be the the starter again.

Dumb and Dumber 'There's a Chance' - YouTube

That's a classic. I could really see that happening/happened.

[Longtimefan]

Redskins veterans pleased that Shanahan has named Robert Griffin III the starter at QB - The Insider - The Washington Post

[CapitalDefense]

You do not give up what we gave up and then let them watch from the sidelines. RG3 is the starter. Period.

Reading NFL defenses? This is the highest level folks! No college team, especially those crappy big 12 defenses, will run the complex defenses that NFL teams do. NFL teams disguise things to try to confuse young QB's and they will confuse RG3 just like they would any young rookie QB coming into the league. From everything I have heard about RG3, he is a film rat and that will help with these complex defenses. He will need some time and I am 100% positive he will pick up things on tape as his career goes along and he will be less and less confused the more he plays.

Man to man, cover 2, 3 or 4 or zone blitzes its not rocket science. RG3 will master them all!

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by fanarchist

Just to clarify. I'm not saying we should use the option as our primary package, or alter the system completely, but instead offer more option looks to disturb defensives predictive abilities. I don't believe the option will be used (if it is at all), as a systemic staple. Moreover what I was eluding to in saying it's a hopeful prospect applies more to the coaching staffs willingness to adopt a less popular package in order to facilitate, and reinforce the strengths of the personel. The hopefulness spawns from the logic that this microcosm could eventually permeate the overall mentality.

Dude. Seriously? This is a football forum not a PhD program. Using a thesaurus doesn't make your points anymore valid or correct than others'.

You could just say you "think the option will be used to keep defenses honest, and using the option would suit our team's strength. Hopefully Shanny continues to employ strategies and tactics based on our personnel." Much more succinct and to the point rather than unclear jargon. Might make you seem less pretentious too.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by hooskins

Dude. Seriously? This is a football forum not a PhD program. Using a thesaurus doesn't make your points anymore valid or correct than others'.

You could just say you "think the option will be used to keep defenses honest, and using the option would suit our team's strength. Hopefully Shanny continues to employ strategies and tactics based on our personnel." Much more succinct and to the point rather than unclear jargon. Might make you seem less pretentious too.

Plus he spelled personnel as personel hehehe

[fanarchist]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Plus he spelled personnel as personel hehehe

I also misused the word elude. Should have been allude, but who's counting.

@hooskins, I don't think the words I use validate my opinion anymore than anyone elses, that's simply the way I write, and have always written since I've been on this site. But your response indicates that you understand, to some degree, what I was getting at, so why don't we talk content, instead of personal attacks and context. I mean this is a "football forum".

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by hooskins

Dude. Seriously? This is a football forum not a PhD program. Using a thesaurus doesn't make your points anymore valid or correct than others'.

You could just say you "think the option will be used to keep defenses honest, and using the option would suit our team's strength. Hopefully Shanny continues to employ strategies and tactics based on our personnel." Much more succinct and to the point rather than unclear jargon. Might make you seem less pretentious too.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by hooskins

Dude. Seriously? This is a football forum not a PhD program. Using a thesaurus doesn't make your points anymore valid or correct than others'.

You could just say you "think the option will be used to keep defenses honest, and using the option would suit our team's strength. Hopefully Shanny continues to employ strategies and tactics based on our personnel." Much more succinct and to the point rather than unclear jargon. Might make you seem less pretentious too.

I'm sure glad you said that. Much more clear, concise, and sufficient.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by hooskins

Dude. Seriously? This is a football forum not a PhD program. Using a thesaurus doesn't make your points anymore valid or correct than others'.

You could just say you "think the option will be used to keep defenses honest, and using the option would suit our team's strength. Hopefully Shanny continues to employ strategies and tactics based on our personnel." Much more succinct and to the point rather than unclear jargon. Might make you seem less pretentious too.

Yeah!! How about next time you talk like the rest of us dumb Americans!!



/facepalm

[los panda]

y'all talk funny

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by hooskins

Dude. Seriously? This is a football forum not a PhD program. Using a thesaurus doesn't make your points anymore valid or correct than others'.

You could just say you "think the option will be used to keep defenses honest, and using the option would suit our team's strength. Hopefully Shanny continues to employ strategies and tactics based on our personnel." Much more succinct and to the point rather than unclear jargon. Might make you seem less pretentious too.

Honestly I find it refreshing that someone on here can write above a thrid grade level.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Honestly I find it refreshing that someone on here can write above a thrid grade level.

Ah thrid grade, that sure brings back some memories. :smashfrea

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Honestly I find it refreshing that someone on here can write above a thrid grade level.

Ms.Jones said I did good when i write at third grade, ain't that tru?

Sent from my Leappad tablet using Kindertalk 2

[los panda]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Ms.Jones said I did good when i write at third grade, ain't that tru?

Sent from my Leappad tablet using Kindertalk 2

lol