When is Enough ,Enough?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Buffalo Bob

What is BS, other than you are an extremely biased hypocrite like the typical liberal.

LOL, you compare Trumps golf travels with Michele Obama's work as first lady,typical republican spinning to trying to save face.

[Buffalo Bob]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL, you compare Trumps golf travels with Michele Obama's work as first lady,typical republican spinning to trying to save face.

Your hypocrisy is pure comedy. For the record I can't stand Trump and wrote in Will Seemore. Whether Michele Obama was working or not doing her globe trotting she took a lot of friends and family along. I give up arguing with you, but I will give you a liberal hypocrite award. It seems ok for Democrats to waste money living it up on the taxpayers dime, but you seem to have a big problem if a Republican does it.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Buffalo Bob

Your hypocrisy is pure comedy. For the record I can't stand Trump and wrote in Will Seemore. Whether Michele Obama was working or not doing her globe trotting she took a lot of friends and family along. I give up arguing with you, but I will give you a liberal hypocrite award. It seems ok for Democrats to waste money living it up on the taxpayers dime, but you seem to have a big problem if a Republican does it.

You give up becuase you can not provide a link to back up the accusation you made,typical republican spin when caught in a "alternative fact"

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Your bias is blinding you.

So I bring up the words and links as fact and you just dismiss it as bias.

You’re a clown period

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Buffalo Bob

Your hypocrisy is pure comedy. For the record I can't stand Trump and wrote in Will Seemore. Whether Michele Obama was working or not doing her globe trotting she took a lot of friends and family along. I give up arguing with you, but I will give you a liberal hypocrite award. It seems ok for Democrats to waste money living it up on the taxpayers dime, but you seem to have a big problem if a Republican does it.

Why don't we compare apples to apples?

President Trump's golf trips vs. President Obama's golf trips?

Michelle Obama's high-flying lifestyle vs. Melania Trump's high flying lifestyle?

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

So I bring up the words and links as fact and you just dismiss it as bias.

You’re a clown period

Bro, you're literally slobbing Trump's knob for calling out a sheister who everyone with half a brain realized was a sheister as soon as he started mouthing off in the media when whats-her-tits was his famous client.

"The man who speaks loudest often says nothing at all."

Or if American Gangster is more your style:

"The loudest one in the room is the weakest one in the room."

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

Bro, you're literally slobbing Trump's knob for calling out a sheister who everyone with half a brain realized was a sheister as soon as he started mouthing off in the media when whats-her-tits was his famous client.

"The man who speaks loudest often says nothing at all."

Or if American Gangster is more your style:

"The loudest one in the room is the weakest one in the room."

But that’s the irony, the thing I’m told people hate so much about our president (trump past behavior, asshole demeanor, etc) was found in Avenatti AND then propped up by the left and embraced.

But Avenatti turns out to be the one left wants trump be more than anything, an indicted, accused felon. What the left needs to realize, trump has been the most investigated man for the last 3 years and nothing has been found. The narrative the left and media has pushed has been lies.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

But that’s the irony, the thing I’m told people hate so much about our president (trump past behavior, asshole demeanor, etc) was found in Avenatti AND then propped up by the left and embraced.

But Avenatti turns out to be the one left wants trump be more than anything, an indicted, accused felon. What the left needs to realize, trump has been the most investigated man for the last 3 years and nothing has been found. The narrative the left and media has pushed has been lies.

The fact that you think nothing has been found is comical , interesting you are comparing a 3rd rate lawyer to the president of the United States and then blame the "left " for telling lies? Trump is dirty and if he was not president would be indicted and still might be so you can take you indignant attitude about the left and their treatment of trump and stick it. Trump isn't close to being investigated as many times as Hilary was so sit back and enjoy the roasting as he lose's his cool.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

So I bring up the words and links as fact and you just dismiss it as bias.

You’re a clown period

.......no you bring up "alternative facts" like kellyanne ,I will say one thing at least she gets paid to lie for trump ,you're just not smart enough to know any better.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

The fact that you think nothing has been found is comical , interesting you are comparing a 3rd rate lawyer to the president of the United States and then blame the "left " for telling lies? Trump is dirty and if he was not president would be indicted and still might be so you can take you indignant attitude about the left and their treatment of trump and stick it. Trump isn't close to being investigated as many times as Hilary was so sit back and enjoy the roasting as he lose's his cool.

Nothing criminal has been found period. Nothing burger

[sdskinsfan2001]

Whatever presidential candidate hates golf the most, gets my vote in 2020.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Nothing criminal has been found period. Nothing burger

That's a lie,simply put and you know it.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Nothing criminal has been found period. Nothing burger

My only issue with this is Mueller punted on the obstructing justice part. He laid out all the evidence and decided he would leave the conclusion to Barr, who got the job by writing a 18 page memo on how the President has practically unlimited powers and the Mueller report isn't legit.

Barr didn't even read the report before he wrote that 4 page summary exonerating Trump.(Source)

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

My only issue with this is Mueller punted on the obstructing justice part. He laid out all the evidence and decided he would leave the conclusion to Barr, who got the job by writing a 18 page memo on how the President has practically unlimited powers and the Mueller report isn't legit.

Barr didn't even read the report before he wrote that 4 page summary exonerating Trump.(Source)

It wasn’t just left to Barr, but with Rosenstein’s backing in coordination with the evidence...Barr and Mueller did speak in the review of investigation as well when it was over. Mueller could have suggested for a prosecution but from the investigation there was clearly too much to exonerate versus obstruction. While the some of the behavior of President was not cool, it was not criminal. To say there is crime, that’s simply false.

Also, the president did cooperate with the investigation...including Don McGahn to testify.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

It wasn’t just left to Barr, but with Rosenstein’s backing in coordination with the evidence...Barr and Mueller did speak in the review of investigation as well when it was over. Mueller could have suggested for a prosecution but from the investigation there was clearly too much to exonerate versus obstruction. While the some of the behavior of President was not cool, it was not criminal. To say there is crime, that’s simply false.

Also, the president did cooperate with the investigation...including Don McGahn to testify.

The president could've interviewed with the special counsel. If you have nothing to hide, why not?

I agree Rosenstein also signed off on that, but we don't know his motivations. It seems he just wanted to get out with his good name intact.

And when Mueller inevitably testifies to Congress I have no doubts he's going to say he would've indicted Trump if Trump weren't President. He felt they had enough evidence to charge Trump but since DOJ policy is a sitting President can't be charged that's where he left it at. Why else would he send a letter to Barr saying he disagrees with Barr's conclusions? (Source)