Cowboys cut T.O.

saden1 · 03-05-2009, 08:55 PM

What a stupid list...would expect teams that want him to say they do? Everyone is evaluating the pros and cons of having TO on their team.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-05-2009, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Williams is talented but I don't know about a monster year. Cooley is as good as Witten if not better. IMO.

If he can have 1200 yards in Detroit he will have a huge year as the #1 receiver in Dallas.

Cooley is right there with Witten as a pass catcher and ball carrier (maybe a shade better) but he isn't near the blocker that Witten is.

Witten can shut down our ends without help, at least he could before the big boy showed up!

Redskins8588 · 03-05-2009, 09:23 PM

On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN

GMScud · 03-05-2009, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN

I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.

Redskins8588 · 03-05-2009, 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.

I agree that we are probably not going to go after a WR, but if we did I wouldn't mind Holt coming in and helping the younger guys and take some pressure off of Moss...

53Fan · 03-05-2009, 09:31 PM

I don't think Holt would be cheap but he is a hell of a receiver. I heard someone say after what Housh and Coles got, Holt thinks he could get a good contract too.

FRPLG · 03-05-2009, 09:34 PM

I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

GMScud · 03-05-2009, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

Make that 14.02%.

I wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

53Fan · 03-05-2009, 09:45 PM

Apparently there are some GM's in the league who share the same genetic defect or that POS SIDE- SHOW called T.O. would have been out of the league a few years ago.

44ever · 03-05-2009, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.

GusFrerotte · 03-05-2009, 10:03 PM

Holt over TO anyday!!!!!! Holt is the consumate professional. I know it is unlikely we will go for him, but he might be a decent grab if the money isn't too steep, but of course it will probably be since the Haynesworth deal.

GusFrerotte · 03-05-2009, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

If he can have 1200 yards in Detroit he will have a huge year as the #1 receiver in Dallas.

Cooley is right there with Witten as a pass catcher and ball carrier (maybe a shade better) but he isn't near the blocker that Witten is.

Witten can shut down our ends without help, at least he could before the big boy showed up!

Roy is great, but everything depends on Romo. I think Romo could be in for a bumpy ride in '09.

GusFrerotte · 03-05-2009, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

Funny. TO would piss off Moss and ARE with his antics. I think the Holt angle would be beneficial though.

GusFrerotte · 03-05-2009, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 44ever

My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.

I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.

44ever · 03-05-2009, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.

I voted no also. Entertained the thought myself. But thats as far as it went.

View Poll Results: T.O. is available, would you want him on the Redskins?
Yes	25	11.36%
No	195	88.64%
Voters: 220. You may not vote on this poll

03-05-2009, 08:55 PM	#151
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. What a stupid list...would expect teams that want him to say they do? Everyone is evaluating the pros and cons of having TO on their team. __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

03-05-2009, 09:23 PM	#153
Redskins8588 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ridgway, PA Age: 46 Posts: 2,519	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt? Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN __________________ "I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor

03-05-2009, 09:31 PM	#156
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. I don't think Holt would be cheap but he is a hell of a receiver. I heard someone say after what Housh and Coles got, Holt thinks he could get a good contract too. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

03-05-2009, 09:34 PM	#157
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 46 Posts: 10,164	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

03-05-2009, 09:45 PM	#159
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. Apparently there are some GM's in the league who share the same genetic defect or that POS SIDE- SHOW called T.O. would have been out of the league a few years ago. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

03-05-2009, 10:03 PM	#161
GusFrerotte Registered User Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area Posts: 4,153	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. Holt over TO anyday!!!!!! Holt is the consumate professional. I know it is unlikely we will go for him, but he might be a decent grab if the money isn't too steep, but of course it will probably be since the Haynesworth deal.

Cowboys cut T.O.

Locker Room Main Forum