Nfl draft round 2 and 3 thread.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Trading back is fine. But when you sacrifice a game breaker then I'm not a fan of it. That pick we could have had a game breaker. Lockett can return kicks, punts and can run all the routes and is a serious deep threat. Very under the radar cause of his size but is as good as any wr in this draft. I'm telling you guys, watch this kid Lockett. Seattle got a really really good player.

Seems a bit extreme. We aren't a 3rd round gamebreaker away from winning it all like maybe Seattle is, I do like the extra picks over 1 potential game breaker.

Sent from my S6 Edge

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Seems a bit extreme. We aren't a 3rd round gamebreaker away from winning it all like maybe Seattle is, I do like the extra picks over 1 potential game breaker.

Sent from my S6 Edge

Exactly. Seattle can afford this rite now. We need Scot to have three extra shots at finding some mid-late round gems than we need one third round gem. Great effing trade.

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Extra picks means we can take a risk

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Trading back is fine. But when you sacrifice a game breaker then I'm not a fan of it. That pick we could have had a game breaker. Lockett can return kicks, punts and can run all the routes and is a serious deep threat. Very under the radar cause of his size but is as good as any wr in this draft. I'm telling you guys, watch this kid Lockett. Seattle got a really really good player.

So you're obviously more of an expert than McCloughan.

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

I wonder if we pick Collins out of LSU with this late 3rd selection.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by artmonkforhallofamein07

I wonder if we pick Collins out of LSU with this late 3rd selection.

Went to Atlanta at 42

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

So you're obviously more of an expert than McCloughan.

So am I just suppose to agree with every he does? Just not a big fan of the move and would have preferred that we drafted Lockett. The reason is our number 3 wr sucks and also proved to be a non factor as a return man. Lockett was a dominant wr and return man that has blazing speed. Hopefully SM can make some hay with these middle round picks. But I think Seattle's GM got a real good player and I think he knows what he's doing.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

So am I just suppose to agree with every he does? Just not a big fan of the move and would have preferred that we drafted Lockett. The reason is our number 3 wr sucks and also proved to be a non factor as a return man. Lockett was a dominant wr and return man that has blazing speed. Hopefully SM can make some hay with these middle round picks. But I think Seattle's GM got a real good player and I think he knows what he's doing.

Maybe Ryan Grant steps up this year. Ill take the three extra picks over a number three wr anyday. Especially with SM's track record.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

So am I just suppose to agree with every he does? Just not a big fan of the move and would have preferred that we drafted Lockett. The reason is our number 3 wr sucks and also proved to be a non factor as a return man. Lockett was a dominant wr and return man that has blazing speed. Hopefully SM can make some hay with these middle round picks. But I think Seattle's GM got a real good player and I think he knows what he's doing.

No, but unless you're some expert NFL scout, I think it's a bit arrogant to say that we passed on a gamebreaker on the freaking 3rd round.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

So am I just suppose to agree with every he does? Just not a big fan of the move and would have preferred that we drafted Lockett. The reason is our number 3 wr sucks and also proved to be a non factor as a return man. Lockett was a dominant wr and return man that has blazing speed. Hopefully SM can make some hay with these middle round picks. But I think Seattle's GM got a real good player and I think he knows what he's doing.

The teams are in different places. Lets get our foundation set and maybe next year we get the 2016 3rd round wunderkind.

And to your question about liking all his moves, given his track record vs our FO for the past 10 years yes I think he ought to get a huge benefit of doubt

Sent from my S6 Edge

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Trading back is fine. But when you sacrifice a game breaker then I'm not a fan of it. That pick we could have had a game breaker. Lockett can return kicks, punts and can run all the routes and is a serious deep threat. Very under the radar cause of his size but is as good as any wr in this draft. I'm telling you guys, watch this kid Lockett. Seattle got a really really good player.

Dafuq? Game breaker?



I'm with most ppl. That was a sweet trade deal we got.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Dafuq? Game breaker?



I'm with most ppl. That was a sweet trade deal we got.

Football Perspective
‏@fbgchase
Washington picked up an insane 178 cents on the dollar in the 4-1 trade with the Seahawks Draft Pick Value Calculator … (69 for 95/115/167/181)

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Dafuq? Game breaker?



I'm with most ppl. That was a sweet trade deal we got.

You obviously saw zero K State games.

[SirLK26]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Trading back is fine. But when you sacrifice a game breaker then I'm not a fan of it. That pick we could have had a game breaker. Lockett can return kicks, punts and can run all the routes and is a serious deep threat. Very under the radar cause of his size but is as good as any wr in this draft. I'm telling you guys, watch this kid Lockett. Seattle got a really really good player.

Agree on Lockett. Great pick by Seattle.

[skinsnut]

It looks like the Skins must have traded out of the top of the 3rd with Seattle who I think holds the 31st slots
Rd 1 - #5(5) Brandon Scherff (OT) Iowa
Rd 2 - #6(38) Preston Smith (DE) Miss St
Rd 3 - #31(95)
Rd 4 - #6(105)
Rd 4 - #13(112)
Rd 5 - #5(141)
Rd 5 - #31(167)
Rd 6 - #5(181)