Around the League

[davy]

Belichick's record without Brady as his quarterback was 83-104, a .449 winning percentage.

Just sayin'.

[AnonEmouse]

Originally Posted by davy

Belichick's record without Brady as his quarterback was 83-104, a .449 winning percentage.

Just sayin'.

TBF that could apply to a number of SB winning coaches.

[calia]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

TBF that could apply to a number of SB winning coaches.

Not Joe Gibbs!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[davy]

Originally Posted by calia

Not Joe Gibbs!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is why I rate Gibbs way above Belichick.

How many Super Bowls would Belichick have won with Theismann, Williams or Rypien?

I'd say none!

[WCommandersfan99]

Originally Posted by davy

Belichick's record without Brady as his quarterback was 83-104, a .449 winning percentage.

Just sayin'.

It was surprisingly bad. Still should not preclude him from being a 1st ballot HOF. His tenure at UNC is off to a rocky start. He's a workaholic, and post Brady hasn't been good. His 8 combined rings and 3x coach of year says enough.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by davy

Belichick's record without Brady as his quarterback was 83-104, a .449 winning percentage.

Just sayin'.

Had Brady gone to Oakland instead of a stacked TB team, his record wouldn't have fared any better TBH. That TB team was a SB contender before he landed, they simply just needed a QB that didn't throw 30 fucking INTs (Jameis Winston).

[calia]

Bobby Wagner is Walter Payton Man of the Year. That’s just awesome!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AnonEmouse]

Good acceptance speech too. Humble.

[88Commanders00]

Do you have around $10 Billion lying around? Then you can be the proud owner of the SuperBowl 60 Champs- Seattle Seahawks. As expected, the Allen Trust put the Seahawks up for sale. I think $10 Billion is realistic, especially for team that just won the Superbowl.

Does Bezos plunk down $10 Billion? This team is a far better buy than we were in 23.

[nonniey]

The Falcons jumping ahead of us last year may have saved the Redskins a lot of heart ache. They jumped ahead thinking the Skins were going to take Pearce (probably correct). He went on to have a great year and now it is likely he will never play again due to what he did over this week - chasing down his former girlfriend and ramming her car(He's lucky the cops didn't shoot him given he apparently hit a cop with his car when they were attempting to arrest him).

[88Commanders00]

From ESPN

>>>>>
The NFL is exploring adding a "Thanksgiving Eve" game on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, potentially starting as early as the 2026 season
. This new, standalone, primetime game would join an already packed holiday schedule of three Thursday games and a Black Friday matchup, aiming to boost revenue and viewer engagement.
ESPN ESPN +5
Key Details Regarding the Potential Wednesday Game:
Timing: The game would take place on Wednesday, Nov. 25, 2026.
Schedule Impact: If implemented, this would create a 10-day, action-packed stretch for football fans, following college games on Saturday and preceding the traditional Thanksgiving and Friday matchups.
Logistics: Teams playing on this Wednesday would likely be coming off a bye week to manage player rest.
Context: This move follows the success of recent holiday expansions, including games on Black Friday and Christmas. <<<
That game will kill a full bye week for 2 teams.

After a game, 9-10 days later you would have the Wednesday game. With the bye 3 days before Wednesday game. Then another game that following Th,Su,M.

[AnonEmouse]

Be interesting to see how they figure this with a proposed 18 game season. Adding this in with the suggestion of only 2 PS games, but an additional bye week, could still see the season extend another week.

[BaltimoreSkins]

People watch it. Not me unless the commanders are in it but that is not for me

[AnonEmouse]

Browns proposing allowing trades with picks up to 5 years ahead. This feels a bit like heading towards madness. How long before a team gives up their whole future draft potential to just win now. Little surprise the Rams are in support. I'd definitely be a buyer in that scenario ("sure we'll have those picks, at the rate you're going, that's a whole slew of #1 picks you're giving up"), but I would be very reticent to gamble away so much draft capital, and then be unable to plan a recovery. GM's living by the sword...

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

Browns proposing allowing trades with picks up to 5 years ahead. This feels a bit like heading towards madness. How long before a team gives up their whole future draft potential to just win now. Little surprise the Rams are in support. I'd definitely be a buyer in that scenario ("sure we'll have those picks, at the rate you're going, that's a whole slew of #1 picks you're giving up"), but I would be very reticent to gamble away so much draft capital, and then be unable to plan a recovery. GM's living by the sword...

Yeah, I don't agree with this idea. A single mistake of trading away that much could cripple a team for years to come, which could make the division less fun.