Warpath's Official Man Law Thread

[TheMalcolmConnection]

HA! Zing. Very nice.

And tape both.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I've posted photographic evidence before. You just have to find it.

[mheisig]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I've posted photographic evidence before. You just have to find it.

Dammit...you keep mentioning this photographic proof and I can't find it. I'll have to perform a more thorough search after work.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

At the risk of hijacking yet another thread, I'll say this and only this: It seems as though many girls are all about the thought of the menage (especially my fiancee) BUT it's more of a thought than a possibility.

Man Law: If girls propose the menage, PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

At the risk of hijacking yet another thread, I'll say this and only this: It seems as though many girls are all about the thought of the menage (especially my fiancee) BUT it's more of a thought than a possibility.

Man Law: If girls propose the menage, PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.

This brings up an interesting point. I propose a man law regarding three ways or a gang bang.

If you and your buddy gang bang a chick, afterward both guys are prohibited from making references about the size, length, diameter of his buddies cock, nor should either guy make any mention of his buddies endurance or lack thereof.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

HAHA! Graphic. I also propose that man law states that you NEVER, under ANY circumstances, share one "end" of a girl. Personally, I'm almost for never joining a buddy on a girl anyway.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

HAHA! Graphic. I also propose that man law states that you NEVER, under ANY circumstances, share one "end" of a girl. Personally, I'm almost for never joining a buddy on a girl anyway.

But you know what, that type of shit usually isn't planned it just sort goes down, if you know what I mean!!!

[TheMalcolmConnection]

HAHA! So true indeed. I remember waking up at a party one night with my buddy slamming some chick right next to me and she's like "Wanna' join us?"

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I was taken at the time so I was a good boyfriend, but yes, that kind of thing just happens.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I was taken at the time so I was a good boyfriend, but yes, that kind of thing just happens.

Dude, you're a better dog...I mean man than I am!

[JoeRedskin]

I've been reading the "bros before hoes" manlaw thread and its various caveats, addendums, and escape clauses.

Pardon me while I puke.

The law is the law. It says what it says. The beauty of it is that it IS open to interpretation. Is my wife a hoe? nope. Does she trump bros in all places and all times 'cause she's not a hoe? nope. If I'm single, am I pulling a bros before hoes if a hot chick makes an incredible offer in the middle of a bro planned event? maybe, maybe not. We'll all find out later when I report back to the bros. If I have to buy them all beers for a week and put up with shit for a month, then yes. If they are buying me beers and giving me serious man-worship for my score, then no. If (as BSB has said) you are cutting yourself off from your bros for a brand new hoe - most probly you are in violation. BUT, if its the once in a lifetime "Damn, this is right" woman, than no - and when you resurface in a few weeks with her, your bros will both celebrate your happiness while they rib you to pieces about how you now a member of the "captured class".

Bros before hoes - means be true to your buds, but it also means that your buds will be true to you. No amount of addendums, escape clauses or other scrivener bullsh** can more fully describe that duty or that bond.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Bros before hoes - means be true to your buds, but it also means that your buds will be true to you. No amount of addendums, escape clauses or other scrivener bullsh** can more fully describe that duty or that bond.

Hmm....this sounds like the closest thing to the man law. Let's vote.

[mheisig]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

I've been reading the "bros before hoes" manlaw thread and its various caveats, addendums, and escape clauses.

Pardon me while I puke.

The law is the law. It says what it says. The beauty of it is that it IS open to interpretation. Is my wife a hoe? nope. Does she trump bros in all places and all times 'cause she's not a hoe? nope. If I'm single, am I pulling a bros before hoes if a hot chick makes an incredible offer in the middle of a bro planned event? maybe, maybe not. We'll all find out later when I report back to the bros. If I have to buy them all beers for a week and put up with shit for a month, then yes. If they are buying me beers and giving me serious man-worship for my score, then no. If (as BSB has said) you are cutting yourself off from your bros for a brand new hoe - most probly you are in violation. BUT, if its the once in a lifetime "Damn, this is right" woman, than no - and when you resurface in a few weeks with her, your bros will both celebrate your happiness while they rib you to pieces about how you now a member of the "captured class".

Bros before hoes - means be true to your buds, but it also means that your buds will be true to you. No amount of addendums, escape clauses or other scrivener bullsh** can more fully describe that duty or that bond.

Unfortunately you leave way too much wiggle room. The reason we get into these problems and people like BSB whining about their feelings being hurt and how they aren't emotionally connected with their bros is because no one has taken the time to define precisely what this all means.

Leaving it at "bros before hoes" is just way to wide open.

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by mheisig

Unfortunately you leave way too much wiggle room. The reason we get into these problems and people like BSB whining about their feelings being hurt and how they aren't emotionally connected with their bros is because no one has taken the time to define precisely what this all means.

Leaving it at "bros before hoes" is just way to wide open.

So the carousel has come back around to the starting point. I think the stuation is almost too relative to put into an actual law. Plus, when a man is totally focused on the tang, "Bros before Hoes" is just noise to him. It sucks, we all hate it and get burned by it but, we also all burn others by it.

MAN LAW: No complaining if a buddy breaks "Bros Before Hoes," BUT, no complaining when you get punched in the face or left at a bar for breaking the code.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by mheisig

Unfortunately you leave way too much wiggle room. The reason we get into these problems and people like BSB whining about their feelings being hurt and how they aren't emotionally connected with their bros is because no one has taken the time to define precisely what this all means.

Leaving it at "bros before hoes" is just way to wide open.

I agree too much wiggle room....bros can't be gettin' hurt over these things.