Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2007, 02:04 PM   #166
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,573
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JankySpanky80 View Post
I wish arch could be gone but i don't think there is any way possible. We can't trade him b/c no one will accept his contract unless he restructures (highly unlikely) or we can't release him b/c of the cap hit. He'll be there and will still be the most expensive back up in league history.
He can be released and we can absorb the hit.

Just watch.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-16-2007, 02:17 PM   #167
JDALY27
Special Teams
 
JDALY27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
He can be released and we can absorb the hit.

Just watch.

Too much dead cap to absorb in 08'. He will be in uniform for 07'.

My call.
JDALY27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 02:19 PM   #168
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
Impact Rookie
 
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 896
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDALY27 View Post
Too much dead cap to absorb in 08'. He will be in uniform for 07'.

My call.

hopefully by uniform you mean concession salesman uniform
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 02:22 PM   #169
JDALY27
Special Teams
 
JDALY27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace View Post
hopefully by uniform you mean concession salesman uniform

Who should replace him?

Our entire D went from 5th to 9th to 31st!!!!!!

Why is that guys??? Not AA.
JDALY27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 02:24 PM   #170
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace
Impact Rookie
 
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 896
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

of course its not all his fault...but the guy certainly didn't help be getting burned so much...he's a run stuffer, he can't cover....we're going to either have to replace him via free agency, or use a low draft pick on a guy
AlvinWalton'sNeckBrace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 02:31 PM   #171
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,573
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDALY27 View Post
Too much dead cap to absorb in 08'. He will be in uniform for 07'.

My call.
Ok based on what numbers?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 02:52 PM   #172
JDALY27
Special Teams
 
JDALY27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Ok based on what numbers?

Didn't we already have this conversation? You were the one that told us all about the dead hit. It was a big time number in the millions in 08'. I'm sure you remember.......
JDALY27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 02:55 PM   #173
JDALY27
Special Teams
 
JDALY27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Ok based on what numbers?
Adam Archuleta will count $2.428 million against the cap in 2007 and is also due a $5 million option bonus. If the Redskins cut him immediately following the season, there would be a $4 million cap hit because of the prorated signing bonus he received last year; however, there would no longer be a salary to account for. If Archuleta is let go early and given a “June 1” designation, then he wouldn’t be paid the $5 million option bonus, and three quarters of that $4 million remaining in the prorated signing bonus would be moved to 2008.

Dead cap space is something else that a lot of fans cry about but don’t really think about until they see/hear what the amount is. This year, Washington is right around $16,507,000, and this number doesn’t carry over. As of now, the 2007 dead cap is a little over half a million dollars, so there is plenty of room to work with since the Redskins are accustomed to carrying at least $14 million on the books over the past few years.

There are other changes that may be made to free up more cap space next year. Carter, Archuleta, Lloyd, and Randle El all signed similar contracts, so if Carter doesn’t work out then he could be cut and there will be some more cap space.
JDALY27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 05:15 PM   #174
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
the thing about archuleta he is not a bad player he just played worse this year than the rest of our defense the contract is way too much but he will be better this year he and sean taylor will be one of the most feared tandoms in the nfl
i doubt it, he can't cover anyone.

as for why our D dropped from 3 to 9 to 31:

after 04 pierce/smoot leave, replaced by marshall/rogers, downgrades. holdman starts some games... oops.

after 05 clark/stoutmire/harris/bowen/lavar/clemons all leave, prioleau hits IR 1 play into the season, every player that was depth here became starters for other teams, and none of them were adequately replaced (lavar -> holdman was a HUGE downgrade, during 05 while the skins won 5 straight, lavar started every game). springs and griffin had some injury issues as well.

i mean, it's not rocket science. if you let good players go and replace them with crappier ones, and neglect ensuring adequate depth, your team isn't going to be very good.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 05:23 PM   #175
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

adam archuleta can't cover true neither can roy williams ok this is what the skins should do keep arch near the line of scrimmage that is where he is most effective and switch springs to safety to rotate on run and pass downs and sign nate clements to start opposite carlos rogers sign fletcher move marshall to weak side to groom rocky mcintosh and if we dont sign kris jenkins draft alan branch if we do sign kris jenkins draft gaines adams
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 05:30 PM   #176
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDALY27 View Post
Adam Archuleta will count $2.428 million against the cap in 2007 and is also due a $5 million option bonus. If the Redskins cut him immediately following the season, there would be a $4 million cap hit because of the prorated signing bonus he received last year; however, there would no longer be a salary to account for. If Archuleta is let go early and given a “June 1” designation, then he wouldn’t be paid the $5 million option bonus, and three quarters of that $4 million remaining in the prorated signing bonus would be moved to 2008.

Dead cap space is something else that a lot of fans cry about but don’t really think about until they see/hear what the amount is. This year, Washington is right around $16,507,000, and this number doesn’t carry over. As of now, the 2007 dead cap is a little over half a million dollars, so there is plenty of room to work with since the Redskins are accustomed to carrying at least $14 million on the books over the past few years.

There are other changes that may be made to free up more cap space next year. Carter, Archuleta, Lloyd, and Randle El all signed similar contracts, so if Carter doesn’t work out then he could be cut and there will be some more cap space.
Huh? Not quibbling with your numbers but it easier to simply state what it would cost to cut him at different times. The above is wholly confusing, Where is Schneed or Canuck?
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 05:32 PM   #177
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
adam archuleta can't cover true neither can roy williams ok this is what the skins should do keep arch near the line of scrimmage that is where he is most effective and switch springs to safety to rotate on run and pass downs and sign nate clements to start opposite carlos rogers sign fletcher move marshall to weak side to groom rocky mcintosh and if we dont sign kris jenkins draft alan branch if we do sign kris jenkins draft gaines adams
Row Williams blows at coverage but AA looks even worse. I don't think he is naturally worse but I think our scheme is far more complicated and Arch had real trouble ficguring it out. Plus the whole secondary coaching fiasco probably screwde him pretty good. I think AA can play in this league I just don't think it can work here.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 05:34 PM   #178
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

yeah but what will we do with him let his uniform stay clean and keep paying him millions to model our jersey
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 05:39 PM   #179
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

so you move arch near the line, you only have 3 guys back and so they go 5 wide and you're screwed. if you can't cover you'll get burnt, a lot. there's no reason to move springs to safety since he's still the best corner the skins have on their roster.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 05:47 PM   #180
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

i am not saying we should but there is MAJOR TALK OF HIM moving to safety next year and if we sign nate clements or asante samuel i thinnk everyone would feel better about him moving to that position and arch used to play linebacker in college why not put him back there at weak side he would go from a slow safety to a fast linebacker look at thomas davis on the panthers worked for him and why not try it our weak side linebacker right now is complete crap
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.43179 seconds with 10 queries