The Vick Factor

DBUCHANON101 · 05-28-2009, 06:44 AM

Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

MTK · 05-28-2009, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

If it was between Colt or Vick, I'd take Colt too.

SBXVII · 05-28-2009, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

If it was between Colt or Vick, I'd take Colt too.

I totally agree, but if it was between Collins and MV I'd take MV.

53Fan · 05-28-2009, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

You'll get no argument from me. I agree.

Slingin Sammy 33 · 05-28-2009, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

You're right on. I'd rather see any of the QBs on our roster under C before Vick....and that includes Chase Daniel. Hell, I'd suit up Zorn before Vick.

Missin21 · 05-29-2009, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

I would rather have the QBs that we already have start for us, definitely. Why spend umpteen million dollars on a guy who is obviously a character issue, not a good leader, & has been proven to be a bad decision maker, mostly off the field, which has inevitably hurt him on the field. I agree that I would rather see Colt start before we go out & get yet another high dollar bust. Colt IS a Redskin currently. He SHOULD get a chance before we do something like that, absolutely.

johno · 05-28-2009, 08:10 AM

lets hope it never comes to it, but colt>vick

MTK · 05-28-2009, 08:30 AM

I'd take Collins over Vick easily.

Monksdown · 05-28-2009, 09:25 AM

I'd take Mark Brunell today, over Mike Vick 3 years ago. Seriously guys, pretend like you have a little class atleast.

30gut · 05-28-2009, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

If it was between Colt or Vick, I'd take Colt too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBXVII

I totally agree, but if it was between Collins and MV I'd take MV.

Quote:

Originally Posted by johno

lets hope it never comes to it, but colt>vick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I'd take Collins over Vick easily.

Out of curiosity, are you guys saying this because of the:

A) the dog fighting conviction

B) he's been out of the NFL for 2 years and might have lost a step

C) you think that Colt(completely unproven 2nd year NFL QB)/Collins (career backup and master of Al Saunders offense) are actually better QBs then Vick (3 time pro-bowler, NFL HOF record holder, and has lead a team to NFC divisional games)

Slingin Sammy 33 · 05-28-2009, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 30gut

Out of curiosity, are you guys saying this because of the:

A) the dog fighting conviction

B) he's been out of the NFL for 2 years and might have lost a step

C) you think that Colt(completely unproven 2nd year NFL QB)/Collins (career backup and master of Al Saunders offense) are actually better QBs then Vick (3 time pro-bowler, NFL HOF record holder, and has lead a team to NFC divisional games)

Can't speak for the other guys but, A, B are defintely big factors as well as C (Vick - Last two years no QB rating over 76, 15-16 record, last 9 games played 2-7 record).

BleedBurgundy · 05-28-2009, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 30gut

Out of curiosity, are you guys saying this because of the:

A) the dog fighting conviction

B) he's been out of the NFL for 2 years and might have lost a step

C) you think that Colt(completely unproven 2nd year NFL QB)/Collins (career backup and master of Al Saunders offense) are actually better QBs then Vick (3 time pro-bowler, NFL HOF record holder, and has lead a team to NFC divisional games)

I sincerely hope you don't intend that Vick should ever be in the hall of fame. Maybe to replace the air fresheners in the urinals...

rbanerjee23 · 05-28-2009, 09:52 AM

WOW...I'm amazed that as many as 32% of people actually want Vick on the Redskins

Monksdown · 05-28-2009, 10:07 AM

It's the Tech factor multiplied by what i like to call the Dan Snyder effect.

KLHJ2 · 05-28-2009, 10:18 AM

I said yes, but not as a QB. I like him as a slash type player. Get him about 3 to 7 touches a game at various positions and let the points soar.

View Poll Results: Should the Skins try to acquire Michael Vick?
Yes	71	32.42%
No	148	67.58%
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll

05-28-2009, 06:44 AM	#1
DBUCHANON101 The Starter Join Date: May 2009 Location: Louisiana Posts: 1,373	Re: The Vick Factor Ill get slammed for this but id rather see Colt start than see us get MV. Colt if anything is a better passer. May not be as strong but is very accurate and in the WCO you dont really need a cannon.

05-28-2009, 08:10 AM	#7
johno Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Southwest, DC Posts: 599	Re: The Vick Factor lets hope it never comes to it, but colt>vick __________________ fight for old dc.

05-28-2009, 08:30 AM	#8
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,050	Re: The Vick Factor I'd take Collins over Vick easily. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

05-28-2009, 09:25 AM	#9
Monksdown The Starter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Warrenton, Virginia Age: 45 Posts: 1,515	Re: The Vick Factor I'd take Mark Brunell today, over Mike Vick 3 years ago. Seriously guys, pretend like you have a little class atleast.

05-28-2009, 09:52 AM	#13
rbanerjee23 The Starter Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,440	Re: The Vick Factor WOW...I'm amazed that as many as 32% of people actually want Vick on the Redskins

05-28-2009, 10:07 AM	#14
Monksdown The Starter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Warrenton, Virginia Age: 45 Posts: 1,515	Re: The Vick Factor It's the Tech factor multiplied by what i like to call the Dan Snyder effect.

05-28-2009, 10:18 AM	#15
KLHJ2 Inactive Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: DC Metro Area Age: 48 Posts: 5,829	Re: The Vick Factor I said yes, but not as a QB. I like him as a slash type player. Get him about 3 to 7 touches a game at various positions and let the points soar.

The Vick Factor

Locker Room Main Forum