Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2013, 04:24 PM   #1
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
wait until griff explodes , its coming.
Absolutely. He's a ticking bomb in a good way.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 04:18 PM   #2
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

anyone notice PG is on pace for 112 catches? Pretty good.. And that RG3 guy sucks , give me Tannehill all day
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 05:01 PM   #3
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

^look at the real estate to the outside. If he is blocked by Paul, the receiver could have blocked down and sealed the end. Folks that's the difference between a possible td and a 4 yard loss. Fred is our best blocking te, with oline shaky thus far, time to get him back on the field
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 05:02 PM   #4
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
^look at the real estate to the outside. If he is blocked by Paul, the receiver could have blocked down and sealed the end. Folks that's the difference between a possible td and a 4 yard loss. Fred is our best blocking te, with oline shaky thus far, time to get him back on the field
You'd think Fred would be playing lights out this season because of his contract. What gives?
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 05:22 PM   #5
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
You'd think Fred would be playing lights out this season because of his contract. What gives?
Coaching staff probably fallin in love with Reed playmaking ability. Which is great, you can rotate and have both on the field.

But Reed cant block worth a sh*t. And Paul looks like he's still learning the position going on year two.

Fred been injured but will be available for Dallas. Time to use him or continue to expect plays like that above.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 05:21 PM   #6
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Nah, if he has to take two years off due to a prison sentence and a year long suspension I would definitely not be happy.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 05:22 PM   #7
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

The RO and play action off it simply gave the OLine a split second advantage last year that they aren't getting this one. Credit MS/KS last year for finding a way to make a mediocre line look good. At the same time, however, they need to find a way to beat a D that is, essentially, pinning its ears back and attacking the LOS. Not sure how they do that, but then I don't make the big bucks.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 07:23 PM   #8
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Regarding the O-Line: GB, Det, and Oakland all have really active fronts that have given them some issues. Getting into the meat of the NFC East should help our OL look a bit better.

I think Chester may be fighting the knee that gave him some issues at the end of last year. No inside information on that, just speculation based on a lack of observable quickness.

Other than that, we're into year three of the "Will Montgomery and Tyler Polumbus get uncontested starting jobs" which is more of a potential issue in the future than an explanation for a slow start by the OL. Trent and Kory have played very well this year, although Trent is capable of playing even better than he has.

Most of the pass protection breakdowns have come from the backs this season. Not the OL.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 11:38 PM   #9
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Regarding the O-Line: GB, Det, and Oakland all have really active fronts that have given them some issues. Getting into the meat of the NFC East should help our OL look a bit better.

I think Chester may be fighting the knee that gave him some issues at the end of last year. No inside information on that, just speculation based on a lack of observable quickness.

Other than that, we're into year three of the "Will Montgomery and Tyler Polumbus get uncontested starting jobs" which is more of a potential issue in the future than an explanation for a slow start by the OL. Trent and Kory have played very well this year, although Trent is capable of playing even better than he has.

Most of the pass protection breakdowns have come from the backs this season. Not the OL.
Do you mean backs and TEs?
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 10-02-2013, 12:13 AM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Do you mean backs and TEs?
Yes, although the TE's haven't been asked to pass block almost at all because the line has been solid on it's assignments. Sometimes the interior guys will get overwhelmed at the point of attack, but keeping a TE in isn't going to change that.

The TE's have struggled on the edge in the running game, and just generally speaking in the passing game. We've gotten almost no return from the position this year, except a couple of quality snaps from Jordan Reed against Green Bay.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 07:30 PM   #11
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Four game stretch where everyone questions if Griffin can win with this team just happens to be the same level of performance of the best four game stretch of Ryan Tannehill's career.

Which is not to say that Griffin hasn't been a disappointment this year. If you told me at the beginning of the year, that Griffin and Tannehill would be virtual equals on the field over the month of September, I would have been disappointed. We could have gotten that level of performance and kept two first rounders and a second.

But it's just four games, and there's at least a chance this will be the weakest four game stretch of RG3's season.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 08:11 PM   #12
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Four game stretch where everyone questions if Griffin can win with this team just happens to be the same level of performance of the best four game stretch of Ryan Tannehill's career.

Which is not to say that Griffin hasn't been a disappointment this year. If you told me at the beginning of the year, that Griffin and Tannehill would be virtual equals on the field over the month of September, I would have been disappointed. We could have gotten that level of performance and kept two first rounders and a second.

But it's just four games, and there's at least a chance this will be the weakest four game stretch of RG3's season.
Really like what I see from Tannehill. He's not all jittery in the pocket, he stands in there and let's thing play out, and throws a hard accurate ball. Looks like Phillip Rivers with a bigger arm and way better mobility. He just needs more games under his belt.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 10:16 PM   #13
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Really like what I see from Tannehill. He's not all jittery in the pocket, he stands in there and let's thing play out, and throws a hard accurate ball. Looks like Phillip Rivers with a bigger arm and way better mobility. He just needs more games under his belt.
Tannehill has been about what I expected him to be in the pros. Good enough to make you look elsewhere to improve your team, for a while. No major issues in his game, a couple minor critical flaws. He has no deep ball, but he compensates that by being an above average runner.

He's a bit of a ball holder in the pocket, but he doesn't compound the problem by being sloppy with the football. And the crappiness of the Dolphins OTs makes the problem look worse than it is.

His upside is almost perfectly average, which is fine. With the 8th pick, you're hoping for more. Rivers isn't a bad comparison, but I think Rivers was a lot better at the same point in his career as a starter.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 11:37 PM   #14
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Tannehill has been about what I expected him to be in the pros. Good enough to make you look elsewhere to improve your team, for a while. No major issues in his game, a couple minor critical flaws. He has no deep ball, but he compensates that by being an above average runner.

He's a bit of a ball holder in the pocket, but he doesn't compound the problem by being sloppy with the football. And the crappiness of the Dolphins OTs makes the problem look worse than it is.

His upside is almost perfectly average, which is fine. With the 8th pick, you're hoping for more. Rivers isn't a bad comparison, but I think Rivers was a lot better at the same point in his career as a starter.
Rivers developed some bad habits but that was fully based on the fact his team was horrible. O line injured and depleted, no receivers and no one to throw to. Gates been injured for 3 years, v jax gone, tomalison gone, sproles gone, etc. so what happens if you force throws and try to do too much. Rivers is a hell of a qb, but like most qb u can't do it alone.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 10-01-2013, 11:39 PM   #15
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: We won!!!!!!!!!! (Redskins vs. Raiders Post Game Thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Tannehill has been about what I expected him to be in the pros. Good enough to make you look elsewhere to improve your team, for a while. No major issues in his game, a couple minor critical flaws. He has no deep ball, but he compensates that by being an above average runner.

He's a bit of a ball holder in the pocket, but he doesn't compound the problem by being sloppy with the football. And the crappiness of the Dolphins OTs makes the problem look worse than it is.

His upside is almost perfectly average, which is fine. With the 8th pick, you're hoping for more. Rivers isn't a bad comparison, but I think Rivers was a lot better at the same point in his career as a starter.
Leading the league in fumbles is not sloppy with the ball?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.47281 seconds with 10 queries