Sua Cravens

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

Reportedly Denver has made "multiple offers " for Cravens

a 2020 7th round pick and a 2019 7th round pick ?

https://www.milehighreport.com/2018/...ns-sua-cravens

I wouldn't even accept that offer, he is worth much more than that. That is unless the defense team do not want Cravens back on the team at all then the office might be forced to accept the low-ball offer.

[diehardskin2982]

Just keep Cravens and let him bounce back

[sdskinsfan2001]

We already have 2 7ths this year. Don't need a 3rd. A 6th this year and 7th next year, and I'd take it.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

Reportedly Denver has made "multiple offers " for Cravens

a 2020 7th round pick and a 2019 7th round pick ?

https://www.milehighreport.com/2018/...ns-sua-cravens

Where are you reading that the offers have been 2020 and 2019 7th rounders? Because the link you provide here definitively does not say that.

[Irrefutable]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Where are you reading that the offers have been 2020 and 2019 7th rounders? Because the link you provide here definitively does not say that.

this is a sarcastic guess of the "multiple offers"

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

Just keep Cravens and let him bounce back

If his play and attitude can earn the trust of the locker room back, then he's definitely worth more than two late round picks!

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk

[SkinzWin]

https://247sports.com/nfl/washington...vens-116459518

[MTK]

If Denver wants him bad enough they’ll eventually make an offer worth considering. Until then he’s a part of this team.

[Schneed10]

I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.

1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.

2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.

3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.

Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.

Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.

1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.

2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.

3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.

Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.

Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.

I would love barkley, but I just don't see them getting that for Cravens and the 13.. It would prob have to include a 1st next yr or our 2nd this yr.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

I would love barkley, but I just don't see them getting that for Cravens and the 13.. It would prob have to include a 1st next yr or our 2nd this yr.

Reading is fundamental, you respond so quickly that you don't even finish reading.

I said 'plus whatever else'.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.



1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.



2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.



3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.



Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.



Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.

Imagine getting Barkley? Pretty sure my head would explode

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I usually don't post unfounded bullshit, but my brain came up with this little crazy conspiracy theory this morning.

1) Redskins and Broncos have been discussing Su'a Cravens. Su'a hired Peter Schaffer, a Denver based agent. No trade has been consummated yet.

2) Broncos have the 5th pick in the draft. They definitely could look at QB. But they did just sign Keenum.

3) Redskins are unabashedly discussing their desire to solve the RB position in this draft.

Could it be, just could it be, that Cravens has been discussed as a possible part of a trade to be consummated on draft day, such that if Saquon Barkley makes it to 5 where the Broncos will be on the clock, then the Redskins will ship Cravens and the 13th plus whatever else to Denver, for the right to move up to 5 and take Saquon.

Reminder this is unfounded bullshit. Do not take this seriously as anything more than spit in the wind. I'm not even sure I'd want this deal, I just found it curious that Cravens has been discussed and that we're basically broadcasting that we intend to do something at RB.

This is interesting scenario.. I really don't like the idea of trading to move up but then I don't watch college football much so I don't know Barkley that much other than what everyone is saying. I suppose it depends on what we give up, after all, we still need to resolve LG and D-line issue.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Reading is fundamental, you respond so quickly that you don't even finish reading.

I said 'plus whatever else'.

I know, that's why I said plus a 2nd or a 1 next yr. Either way it would be great to get him.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

This is interesting scenario.. I really don't like the idea of trading to move up but then I don't watch college football much so I don't know Barkley that much other than what everyone is saying. I suppose it depends on what we give up, after all, we still need to resolve LG and D-line issue.

He's got potential but there have been so many RB bust over the years, it is tough to trade a lot for one.