Warpath's Official Man Law Thread

mheisig · 06-15-2006, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

There needs to be clarification with that law. If my buddies are having a drinking night and my fiancee is promising me nookie, I'm going to do my best to get both, but if I DO have to make a choice, I'm picking tang any day of the week.

Well said. I think in general sex with chicks trumps time with guys pretty much all the time. Possible exceptions are sideline tickets to a 'Skins game. However, should Jessica Alba/Scarlet Johansen become available, the escape clause can be activated even in the event of sideline 'Skins tickets.

TheMalcolmConnection · 06-15-2006, 10:31 AM

Yeah, it would have to be a pretty amazing chick (honestly, THEY would have to be pretty amazing CHICKS) for me to skip out on Skins sideline passes. Honestly though, if my fiancee was proposing the menage I'd skip out on a Skins game too! I can always tape it.

cpayne5 · 06-15-2006, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Yeah, it would have to be a pretty amazing chick (honestly, THEY would have to be pretty amazing CHICKS) for me to skip out on Skins sideline passes. Honestly though, if my fiancee was proposing the menage I'd skip out on a Skins game too! I can always tape it.

Tape what? lol

TheMalcolmConnection · 06-15-2006, 10:35 AM

HA! Zing. Very nice.

And tape both.

mheisig · 06-15-2006, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpayne5

Tape what? lol

Seriously, you'd better tape and distribute both. Remember Man Law referencing "Hot Chick Photograph Evidence"

TheMalcolmConnection · 06-15-2006, 10:37 AM

I've posted photographic evidence before. You just have to find it.

TheMalcolmConnection · 06-15-2006, 10:38 AM

At the risk of hijacking yet another thread, I'll say this and only this: It seems as though many girls are all about the thought of the menage (especially my fiancee) BUT it's more of a thought than a possibility.

Man Law: If girls propose the menage, PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.

mheisig · 06-15-2006, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I've posted photographic evidence before. You just have to find it.

Dammit...you keep mentioning this photographic proof and I can't find it. I'll have to perform a more thorough search after work.

12thMan · 06-15-2006, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

There needs to be clarification with that law. If my buddies are having a drinking night and my fiancee is promising me nookie, I'm going to do my best to get both, but if I DO have to make a choice, I'm picking tang any day of the week.

Well...the man law is bros before hoes, I wouldn't put one's fiance in that category, per se.

12thMan · 06-15-2006, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

At the risk of hijacking yet another thread, I'll say this and only this: It seems as though many girls are all about the thought of the menage (especially my fiancee) BUT it's more of a thought than a possibility.

Man Law: If girls propose the menage, PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.

This brings up an interesting point. I propose a man law regarding three ways or a gang bang.

If you and your buddy gang bang a chick, afterward both guys are prohibited from making references about the size, length, diameter of his buddies cock, nor should either guy make any mention of his buddies endurance or lack thereof.

TheMalcolmConnection · 06-15-2006, 10:58 AM

HAHA! Graphic. I also propose that man law states that you NEVER, under ANY circumstances, share one "end" of a girl. Personally, I'm almost for never joining a buddy on a girl anyway.

12thMan · 06-15-2006, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

HAHA! Graphic. I also propose that man law states that you NEVER, under ANY circumstances, share one "end" of a girl. Personally, I'm almost for never joining a buddy on a girl anyway.

But you know what, that type of shit usually isn't planned it just sort goes down, if you know what I mean!!!

TheMalcolmConnection · 06-15-2006, 11:02 AM

HAHA! So true indeed. I remember waking up at a party one night with my buddy slamming some chick right next to me and she's like "Wanna' join us?"

TheMalcolmConnection · 06-15-2006, 11:02 AM

I was taken at the time so I was a good boyfriend, but yes, that kind of thing just happens.

JoeRedskin · 06-15-2006, 11:08 AM

I've been reading the "bros before hoes" manlaw thread and its various caveats, addendums, and escape clauses.

Pardon me while I puke.

The law is the law. It says what it says. The beauty of it is that it IS open to interpretation. Is my wife a hoe? nope. Does she trump bros in all places and all times 'cause she's not a hoe? nope. If I'm single, am I pulling a bros before hoes if a hot chick makes an incredible offer in the middle of a bro planned event? maybe, maybe not. We'll all find out later when I report back to the bros. If I have to buy them all beers for a week and put up with shit for a month, then yes. If they are buying me beers and giving me serious man-worship for my score, then no. If (as BSB has said) you are cutting yourself off from your bros for a brand new hoe - most probly you are in violation. BUT, if its the once in a lifetime "Damn, this is right" woman, than no - and when you resurface in a few weeks with her, your bros will both celebrate your happiness while they rib you to pieces about how you now a member of the "captured class".

Bros before hoes - means be true to your buds, but it also means that your buds will be true to you. No amount of addendums, escape clauses or other scrivener bullsh** can more fully describe that duty or that bond.

06-15-2006, 10:31 AM	#182
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread Yeah, it would have to be a pretty amazing chick (honestly, THEY would have to be pretty amazing CHICKS) for me to skip out on Skins sideline passes. Honestly though, if my fiancee was proposing the menage I'd skip out on a Skins game too! I can always tape it. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

06-15-2006, 10:35 AM	#184
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread HA! Zing. Very nice. And tape both. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

06-15-2006, 10:37 AM	#186
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread I've posted photographic evidence before. You just have to find it. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

06-15-2006, 10:38 AM	#187
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread At the risk of hijacking yet another thread, I'll say this and only this: It seems as though many girls are all about the thought of the menage (especially my fiancee) BUT it's more of a thought than a possibility. Man Law: If girls propose the menage, PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

06-15-2006, 10:58 AM	#191
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread HAHA! Graphic. I also propose that man law states that you NEVER, under ANY circumstances, share one "end" of a girl. Personally, I'm almost for never joining a buddy on a girl anyway. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

06-15-2006, 11:02 AM	#193
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread HAHA! So true indeed. I remember waking up at a party one night with my buddy slamming some chick right next to me and she's like "Wanna' join us?" __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

06-15-2006, 11:02 AM	#194
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread I was taken at the time so I was a good boyfriend, but yes, that kind of thing just happens. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

06-15-2006, 11:08 AM	#195
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 62 Posts: 10,401	Re: Warpath's Official Man Law Thread I've been reading the "bros before hoes" manlaw thread and its various caveats, addendums, and escape clauses. Pardon me while I puke. The law is the law. It says what it says. The beauty of it is that it IS open to interpretation. Is my wife a hoe? nope. Does she trump bros in all places and all times 'cause she's not a hoe? nope. If I'm single, am I pulling a bros before hoes if a hot chick makes an incredible offer in the middle of a bro planned event? maybe, maybe not. We'll all find out later when I report back to the bros. If I have to buy them all beers for a week and put up with shit for a month, then yes. If they are buying me beers and giving me serious man-worship for my score, then no. If (as BSB has said) you are cutting yourself off from your bros for a brand new hoe - most probly you are in violation. BUT, if its the once in a lifetime "Damn, this is right" woman, than no - and when you resurface in a few weeks with her, your bros will both celebrate your happiness while they rib you to pieces about how you now a member of the "captured class". Bros before hoes - means be true to your buds, but it also means that your buds will be true to you. No amount of addendums, escape clauses or other scrivener bullsh** can more fully describe that duty or that bond. __________________ Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.

Warpath's Official Man Law Thread

Parking Lot