Snyder Camp Upset!!

[Monksdown]

[QUOTE=NC_Skins;782290]I hate ignorant people and ignorant posts, and this takes the cake in my opinion. QUOTE]

With your 53 posts, you are the expert on ignorant posts? Noob, i know the crowd around here is really tightly packed. But don't forget that there is an edge to the crowd.

[MonkFan4Life]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

SO does anybody supporting Dan Snyder.

Are you serious ? After all the bullshit that you've written with this statement you've taken the cake.

[irish]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

I take Snyder's side on this one. And i can honestly say that other than firing Cerrato twice, i haven't agreed with him on much. The article, while accurate was inflamatory and tasted a little too much of yellow journalism. I mean, yes he cut down trees that didn't belong to him and were protected. But did he go 'agent orange' on them?

And i personally think that depicting a jew with devil horns is one of the most despicable things i've seen in print in a long time. For that alone, 2 million plus fees is appropriate. That's just my opinion. I like that he will give it to homeless organizations if he wins.

I understand that the author didn't place the devil horns on the picture himself, that it was probably done by someone ignorant of the history tied to the that insult for jewish people. The buck stops at the editor, and i will never read their material again. And i don't want a publication that puts that garbage out in our town.

I had no idea DS was Jewish and I suspect the "cartoonist" didnt either. Either way I dont think any of the accusations or picture were done because DS is Jewish because quite frankly I dont think anyone cares what religion he is. He just a bad owner of a once proud NFL team.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by irish

I had no idea DS was Jewish and I suspect the "cartoonist" didnt either. Either way I dont think any of the accusations or picture were done because DS is Jewish because quite frankly I dont think anyone cares what religion he is. He just a bad owner of a once proud NFL team.

Yeah I didn't know he was Jewish either, and to throw out the anti-semite card is so pathetic. Like Feinstein said, none of this has anything to do with anti-semitism. It has to do with anti-Snyder.

The Little Danny wants this guy fired plain and simple. He's got no shot to win that lawsuit. I personally thought the article was hilarious. I don't care for Dan Snyder, and I'm glad he's getting roasted for this.

I know Snyder has done some good things as far as charitable donations (not like it affects him considering how much money he has), and I know he flew everyone to Sean's funeral, etc etc. But his douchebaggery FAR outweighs any good he's done. I personally don't really think that's even up for debate.

[juskins]

Every news agency is letting Snyder know that he has pulled another Lu-Lu, yet again. This is a short article I found in "Forbes" regarding our "put-your-foot in your mouth, Dan: What is Dan Snyder Thinking? - Monte Burke - The Owner’s Box - Forbes

[Longtimefan]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Yeah I didn't know he was Jewish either, and to throw out the anti-semite card is so pathetic. Like Feinstein said, none of this has anything to do with anti-semitism. It has to do with anti-Snyder.

The Little Danny wants this guy fired plain and simple. He's got no shot to win that lawsuit. I personally thought the article was hilarious. I don't care for Dan Snyder, and I'm glad he's getting roasted for this.

I know Snyder has done some good things as far as charitable donations (not like it affects him considering how much money he has), and I know he flew everyone to Sean's funeral, etc etc. But his douchebaggery FAR outweighs any good he's done. I personally don't really think that's even up for debate.

Dan Snyder has a right to protect his reputation against defamatory remarks and depictions; however, he faces an uphill battle in this particular case, especially since he is easily labeled as a public figure. He is seeking $1 million+ in addition to punitive damages. Snyder must prove that those “lies, half-truths, innuendo and anti-Semitic imagery to smear, malign, defame and slander” actually damaged his reputation and he must prove with convincing clarity that WCP published the article with knowledge or in reckless disregard of its falsity and its defamatory character. In order for Snyder to have any chance on this one, he must prove that WCP had intent for actual malice.

[wilsowilso]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

I take Snyder's side on this one. And i can honestly say that other than firing Cerrato twice, i haven't agreed with him on much. The article, while accurate was inflamatory and tasted a little too much of yellow journalism. I mean, yes he cut down trees that didn't belong to him and were protected. But did he go 'agent orange' on them?

And i personally think that depicting a jew with devil horns is one of the most despicable things i've seen in print in a long time. For that alone, 2 million plus fees is appropriate. That's just my opinion. I like that he will give it to homeless organizations if he wins.

I understand that the author didn't place the devil horns on the picture himself, that it was probably done by someone ignorant of the history tied to the that insult for jewish people. The buck stops at the editor, and i will never read their material again. And i don't want a publication that puts that garbage out in our town.

The anti-semetic argument is a joke. It's insulting.

The fact that the man owns a team named the "Redskins" makes the argument beyond pathetic.

[Monksdown]

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

The anti-semetic argument is a joke. It's insulting.

The fact that the man owns a team named the "Redskins" makes the argument beyond pathetic.

Why is that, when i've heard from Indian's that like the name? I haven't yet met a jew who is cool with people thinking that he is the spawn of satan.

[wilsowilso]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

Why is that, when i've heard from Indian's that like the name? I haven't yet met a jew who is cool with people thinking that he is the spawn of satan.

First of all Indians are from India.

There is a significant Native American population that finds the name "Redskins" horribly offensive.

It's not up for debate. It's a stone cold fact.

Secondly, who do you know that would be cool with people thinking that they were the spawn of satan?

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

Why is that, when i've heard from Indian's that like the name? I haven't yet met a jew who is cool with people thinking that he is the spawn of satan.

Bullshit. Apparently you missed the post where the EDITOR and COVER ARTIST people for the WCP that approved the picture/article are BOTH Jewish.


Yeah, Jewish people are reallllllllly offended...lol


You guys are absolutely hilarious. Forget the facts, lets just make up shit.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

I take Snyder's side on this one. And i can honestly say that other than firing Cerrato twice, i haven't agreed with him on much. The article, while accurate was inflamatory and tasted a little too much of yellow journalism. I mean, yes he cut down trees that didn't belong to him and were protected. But did he go 'agent orange' on them?

And i personally think that depicting a jew with devil horns is one of the most despicable things i've seen in print in a long time. For that alone, 2 million plus fees is appropriate. That's just my opinion. I like that he will give it to homeless organizations if he wins.

I understand that the author didn't place the devil horns on the picture himself, that it was probably done by someone ignorant of the history tied to the that insult for jewish people. The buck stops at the editor, and i will never read their material again. And i don't want a publication that puts that garbage out in our town.

Those trees were on his property.

[Monksdown]

Originally Posted by firstdown

Those trees were on his property.

thanks, i forgot that detail.

[irish]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

thanks, i forgot that detail.

No they werent, they were on a scenic easement (owned by the Natl Parks Service) between his property and the C&O Canal. He received permission from the NPS to cut down the trees but it was later determined the NPS did not follow proper procedures to grant that permit and questions arose about whether DS's position, connections, and $ improperly influenced the process. In the end, DS had a permit from the NPS to cut down those trees but that permit was improperly issued.

[Longtimefan]

D.C. Sports Bog - Brett Haber on Daniel Snyder

[Monksdown]

Brett Haber blows.