Redskins Receivers Rotation

[Bucket]

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
--------------
Stallworth - If we cut Clemmens, then we could possibly keep Stallworth as a 6th?
Paul - PS
Banks - PS
Robinson - PS

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
--------------
Stallworth - If we cut Clemmens, then we could possibly keep Stallworth as a 6th?
Paul - PS
Banks - PS
Robinson - PS

No way Banks lands on the PS. It's either active roster or another team for him.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Moss
Gaffney
Armstrong
Austin
Hankerson
--------------
Stallworth - If we cut Clemmens, then we could possibly keep Stallworth as a 6th?
Paul - PS
Banks - PS
Robinson - PS

Banks can't go on the PS.

[Jontrem]

Just a thought here, but does Banks have any trade value?

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Jontrem

Just a thought here, but does Banks have any trade value?

Probably minimal. Teams will try to devalue him because of the NFL's new kickoff rule.

[Kindoy]

I would absolutely hate to lose Banks. He's a playmaker... we don't have many playmakers. There's always room for players like him. It's not like he's only a return man, he can play some receiver too. We just have to find ways to get him the ball, that's the coaches job.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Kindoy

I would absolutely hate to lose Banks. He's a playmaker... we don't have many playmakers. There's always room for players like him. It's not like he's only a return man, he can play some receiver too. We just have to find ways to get him the ball, that's the coaches job.

Banks value significantly dropped with that kickoff rule. I really couldn't tell you how good is Banks as a WR, I feel like I haven't seen enough of him and he didn't get the chance to showcase that this offseason. Unfortunately, I just can't see the team keeping Banks over Austin.

[SFREDSKIN]

If I had to choose between Banks and Paul as our final WR, would choose Paul (bigger with more upside).

[SmootSmack]

Banks' value has declined but as a KR he's more valuable this year than say Niles Paul. And he's more valuable as a KR than Paul would be as an inactive 6th receiver

[jonny5dicky]

We need to keep Banks because he's a little big like Devin Hester, since Rex Grossman is our starting quarterback he's be perfect.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by jonny5dicky

We need to keep Banks because he's a little big like Devin Hester, since Rex Grossman is our starting quarterback he's be perfect.

wide receiver thread to ehh?

[mooby]

Originally Posted by jonny5dicky

We need to keep Banks because he's a little big like Devin Hester, since Rex Grossman is our starting quarterback he's be perfect.

He even manages to turn discussions about kick/punt returners into Grossman. There's no way he can be serious. Bravo man, bravo.

[Jontrem]

Originally Posted by mooby

He even manages to turn discussions about kick/punt returners into Grossman. There's no way he can be serious. Bravo man, bravo.

I cant even be 100% sure as to what he means by all that drivel, how did you decipher it?

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Jontrem

I cant even be 100% sure as to what he means by all that drivel, how did you decipher it?

What's to decipher? He just wrote that last sentence as a means to insert Grossman into a completely unrelated conversation. It doesn't matter whether it makes sense or not. He may be a troll, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't entertained.

[SFREDSKIN]

Isn't there a new rule for this year where you can have 46 players active instead of 45?