Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes

REDSKINS4ever · 11-30-2012, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

need a TE too. paulsen isn't good enough. we don't NEED fred davis, but we need someone in between the two at least.

We DO need Fred Davis. And Paulsen is starting because the coaches feel he's earn it. He's not your typical TE, but he does a pretty good job. I don't see the Redskins drafting a TE. At least not until the later rounds. Niles Paul could develop into a solid TE.

CRedskinsRule · 11-29-2012, 09:03 AM

I would like to see the kind of competition at S that we have seen at RB and WR over the Shanallen years. Every off season, we bring in old & young RB's and WR's, and they duel it out in a best man win style.

We should be doing that with Safeties as well, but instead it feels like they get a guy, who is the guy, only he's not the guy they thought he was, so now we have no guy, and our defense ranks nowhere near our offense, where we have a guy who proved he was the guy by beating out the other guys who weren't that guy.

make sense guys?
:cheeky-sm

SmootSmack · 11-29-2012, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I would like to see the kind of competition at S that we have seen at RB and WR over the Shanallen years. Every off season, we bring in old & young RB's and WR's, and they duel it out in a best man win style.

We should be doing that with Safeties as well, but instead it feels like they get a guy, who is the guy, only he's not the guy they thought he was, so now we have no guy, and our defense ranks nowhere near our offense, where we have a guy who proved he was the guy by beating out the other guys who weren't that guy.

make sense guys?
:cheeky-sm

Strong post

53Fan · 11-29-2012, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I would like to see the kind of competition at S that we have seen at RB and WR over the Shanallen years. Every off season, we bring in old & young RB's and WR's, and they duel it out in a best man win style.

We should be doing that with Safeties as well, but instead it feels like they get a guy, who is the guy, only he's not the guy they thought he was, so now we have no guy, and our defense ranks nowhere near our offense, where we have a guy who proved he was the guy by beating out the other guys who weren't that guy.

make sense guys?)
:cheeky-sm

Get ahold of yourself man!!!

Makes perfect sense.

REDSKINS4ever · 11-30-2012, 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I would like to see the kind of competition at S that we have seen at RB and WR over the Shanallen years. Every off season, we bring in old & young RB's and WR's, and they duel it out in a best man win style.

We should be doing that with Safeties as well, but instead it feels like they get a guy, who is the guy, only he's not the guy they thought he was, so now we have no guy, and our defense ranks nowhere near our offense, where we have a guy who proved he was the guy by beating out the other guys who weren't that guy.

make sense guys?
:cheeky-sm

I know what you mean!

SmootSmack · 11-30-2012, 07:49 AM

I think he meant we don't need another Fred Davis

Chico23231 · 11-30-2012, 08:36 AM

Pauleson been fine this year, in fact exceed expectations. Bring back Fred and continue to develop Niles (great special teamer), we will be fine.

los panda · 11-30-2012, 12:06 PM

davis is a rock solid #1
paulsen is a good backup
and paul, well, he's a great special teamer

te is not a need. lock up davis

Evilgrin · 11-30-2012, 12:20 PM

Pretty sure Griff likes Davis, thats a big factor now.

12thMan · 11-30-2012, 12:25 PM

Paulsen has earned his keeps and then some. Good back-up, mostly reliable.

That Guy · 11-30-2012, 01:03 PM

davis is the best option, i'm just saying, if someone wants to overpay him, there are two other guys we can get for less in FA that'd be fine. paulsen has been okay, but he's not a solid #1 pass catcher.

los panda · 11-30-2012, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

davis is the best option, i'm just saying, if someone wants to overpay him, there are two other guys we can get for less in FA that'd be fine. paulsen has been okay, but he's not a solid #1 pass catcher.

let's sign winslow and shockey to huge deals

punch it in · 11-30-2012, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by los panda

let's sign winslow and shockey to huge deals

And Cooley. We will have another "over the hill gang" at tight end. Kilmer can be the assisstant to the traveling secondary.

REDSKINS4ever · 11-30-2012, 01:55 PM

I wish Cooley would get in the mix. He hasn't caught one damn pass since returning.

punch it in · 11-30-2012, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever

I wish Cooley would get in mix. He hasn't caught one damn pass since returning.

If he did you wouldnt give him credit for it anyway.

11-29-2012, 09:03 AM	#2
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 58 Posts: 21,744	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes I would like to see the kind of competition at S that we have seen at RB and WR over the Shanallen years. Every off season, we bring in old & young RB's and WR's, and they duel it out in a best man win style. We should be doing that with Safeties as well, but instead it feels like they get a guy, who is the guy, only he's not the guy they thought he was, so now we have no guy, and our defense ranks nowhere near our offense, where we have a guy who proved he was the guy by beating out the other guys who weren't that guy. make sense guys? :cheeky-sm

11-30-2012, 07:49 AM	#6
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes I think he meant we don't need another Fred Davis __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

11-30-2012, 08:36 AM	#7
Chico23231 Warpath Hall of Fame Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 35,307	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes Pauleson been fine this year, in fact exceed expectations. Bring back Fred and continue to develop Niles (great special teamer), we will be fine. __________________ My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us

11-30-2012, 12:06 PM	#8
los panda Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 5,230	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes davis is a rock solid #1 paulsen is a good backup and paul, well, he's a great special teamer te is not a need. lock up davis __________________ 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81

11-30-2012, 12:20 PM	#9
Evilgrin The Starter Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Bethesda, MD Posts: 1,074	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes Pretty sure Griff likes Davis, thats a big factor now.

11-30-2012, 12:25 PM	#10
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes Paulsen has earned his keeps and then some. Good back-up, mostly reliable.

11-30-2012, 01:03 PM	#11
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 43 Posts: 17,620	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes davis is the best option, i'm just saying, if someone wants to overpay him, there are two other guys we can get for less in FA that'd be fine. paulsen has been okay, but he's not a solid #1 pass catcher.

11-30-2012, 01:55 PM	#14
REDSKINS4ever Playmaker Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Washington, D.C. Posts: 4,117	Re: Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes I wish Cooley would get in the mix. He hasn't caught one damn pass since returning.

Redskins Offensive Line: 2012 Unsung Heroes

Locker Room Main Forum