![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
What? Manning led his team down the field to win the game with a few minutes left. Brady had several chances to end the game and then threw an INT to end it. Better leader?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: University of South Carolina
Age: 37
Posts: 577
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
Yea Brady is without a doubt a better leader then Manning, IMO thats really what has been holding Manning back from winning big. Manning has one good game after the last two he played where he threw what 7 picks? Brady was coaching other players out there and is striving a team to victory. Look what Brady has to work with compared to Manning with his 2 pro bowl recivers and Clark. No comparison.
__________________
University Of South Carolina '11 Go Cocks and Go Skins #21#RIP Sean Taylor a TRUE Redskin#21# <--Hey wheres my green approval rating? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 372
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
Tom Brady is coaching players out there? Of course he's going to have to give brand new receivers some advice, what quarterback wouldn't do that, I mean, they're in a brand new system. Ok, Manning has two great receivers, but in my opinion, until this year, Brady is the one who's team has been loaded with weapons. Every year they won the superbowl, he's had one of the BEST defenses in the league, why Manning's defenses have been average to below average. Brady's offensive line has always outplayed Manning's in past battles, plus it's not like Brady has had slouches at receiver in the past until this year. Plus, their TE Watson is just as good as Clark is. Back to the defense again, just think about how the Pat's defenses were loaded with great players: Seymore, Bruschi, Harrison, Vrabel, McGinnest, and Law. See, once the Pat's dont have those players and the talent level overall is more even, COLTS WIN! I guess my bottom line is that Tom Brady has been instrumental in winning 3 superbowls, but not anymore instrumental than the Pat's stingy defenses and great coaching. And as proved yesterday and last year in the Bronco's loss in the playoffs, when they don't have Charlie Weiss, Romeo Cornell, Ty Law, McGinnest, Harrison, Branch and Givens, Tom Brady is mortal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arrington, Va.
Posts: 99
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Well, well, what do you know? Manning has taken his first step toward making all those big stats actually mean something in this debate. I’ve got to give credit where credit is due- I have stated that I believe pressure adversely affects Manning. Clearly that was not the case yesterday. Even after costing his team seven points, he pulled himself together and engineered the biggest comeback in conference championship game history. He was outstanding. Hu-rah.
Now, he’s one big game, one big win, from filling in that aching hole in his heart and on his resume. The Colts are a pretty solid favorite and, given the way their defense is playing, it would appear this isn’t asking too much. We shall see. As for Brady, he remains the league’s best big game quarterback- and thus the best quarterback, period. No, he didn’t get it done yesterday. Yes, he failed in the clutch yesterday when attempting to lead his team downfield to a touchdown in the closing seconds. However, it is a tribute to just how accomplished Brady has become in these situations that despite the odds, most folks probably half-expected him to pull another one out anyway. He’s still not yet 30. In six seasons as a starter, he's led his team to three titles and to the brink of a fourth. He’ll be back. But back to Manning. As great as he was yesterday, he isn’t there yet. One game can’t make up for all of his past failings, or erase Brady’s success in the same situations over the past 6 years. Again, he’s taken a solid step toward proving his supporters right, toward making the case that he, not Brady, is the game’s best QB- I can't deny that and won't attempt to for ego's sake. He can take another step against the Bears, and then this debate will get a lot more interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Man I thought this would be case closed. It almost was. Now I figure we have a legit debate. That was a pretty bad first part of the game for Manning and a Hall of Fame performance afterward. No Denying that. Manning was brilliant in the second half. It's only one game, but I have no doubt Manning has a ring now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BillysBurg, Va.
Posts: 489
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
That was a great game. Great to see mr. iceman thaw out. I just wish the saints had a little more today, well i guess alot more, but it looks to be a great superbowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Brady played very well today. Very efficient day, best performance of the playoffs for him so far. He didn't make the Patriots D break down.
Peyton Manning did. The ultimate outcome wasn't shocking to me, it was just a very exciting well played game. I think this goes a long way to tear down Brady's fabricated image as unbreakable and Manning's fabricated image as a choker. Both are very good QBs, and Manning's still better. He's not better because of what he did today, he's better for what he's been doing his whole career.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Tom Brady put up 27 points offensivley. Give me a break. He is probaboly the best quarterback in football because he wins. That is all that matters. People act like they got blown out, Brady is better than probaboly any quarterback in the history of our franchise (I really can comment on Baugh/Jurgenson, so I could be wrong there), I dont understand why people hate him just because he is good. (I by the way, wanted Manning to win, but people blaming Tom Brady for this are off their rockers)
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 44
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Brady has more poise than Manning. I value that more than anything else. Yes, even more than stats!
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
How do you know he has more poise? Is your poise-o-meter flying off the charts or something? What's your reasoning?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 44
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
Anyways, you said it yourself: Brady moves in the pocket better. That is just a result of not being rattled as easily as Manning. Not rattled as easily = more poise. And, I'm sure that you'll come with some sorta stat that PROVES Manning is more poised. I just don't care for stats that much -- they're misleading (a poor way to prove an argument, IMO).
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Tom "Iceman" Brady
Quote:
Stats only mislead people who don't understand how to use them correctly. But yeah, I think Brady has great pocket presence. He's just a tough guy to get to for the sack. Manning also has great pocket presence, but he likes to throw the ball quicker rather than move all over. I have no idea who has more poise. It's an intangible. Either way, if Brady WAS in fact more poised, it doesn't help him complete more passes than Manning, so it's moot. All we can see is the total package. You can't break these guys down into categories and compare one vs. the other, these skills overlap and compensate for one another. Stats can't show who has more poise or better leadership. They can only show who is giving the best results.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|