05-14-2012, 03:37 AM | #226 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 551
|
Seriously. I would love to be the team that puts pressure on the defense by having no huddle done well. Get some 12 men on the field and off sides calls.
|
Advertisements |
05-14-2012, 03:38 AM | #227 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
power plays and open nets, indeed
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
05-14-2012, 05:20 AM | #228 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,105
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
The Buffao Bills ran that no huddle offense well during the early 1990s and they went to 4 straight Super Bowls. Whether Mike Shanahan wants to incorporate the no huddle offense as a wrinkle or as something basic and continuous, it should be effective. A no huddle west coast offense would place so much pressure on opposing defenses no doubt.
|
05-14-2012, 08:44 AM | #229 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,060
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Common, and its getting catchy in high school fb especially down south. Im not a fan of the full blown no huddle-o. I liked how Manning uses it to catch the D off guard and i think those situations would really benefit RG3. But other than that i think it puts as much fatigue on the O as the D.
__________________
Lafayette, we're here. HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14. |
05-14-2012, 12:06 PM | #230 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
So you are acknowledging in this statement that the Shanahans have yet to "get it right", but the pragmatists who are calling for results over fluff are "haters". Not to mention the word "just", implies that you don't want to see improvement for the sake of validating Griffen, the morale of the team and the fan base, or success of the organization as a whole, it's solely for the purpose of authenticating your position over the people who have merit in their disagreement.
Last edited by fanarchist; 05-14-2012 at 12:25 PM. |
05-14-2012, 12:14 PM | #231 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
He can handle it. He's smart enough to look at a defense and call a play in a hurry.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
05-14-2012, 01:07 PM | #232 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,477
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
05-14-2012, 01:45 PM | #233 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 537
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
|
05-14-2012, 01:53 PM | #234 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
|
05-14-2012, 02:03 PM | #235 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
I love talking about the no-huddle in abstract but I don't see how or why people think we would use it more often. In the past this offense (Mike/Kyle) hasn't been a no huddle offense. And if we're speaking honestly the performance in 2 minute and hurry has been lacking regardless of the QB (McNabb/Rex). With McNabb the excuse was he didn't know the offense with Rex there was no excuse. (equipment malfunction?) I'm sure Kyle will improve with his hurry-up/2 minute offense/playcalling as he gains experience but I think its a hellavu strecth to think we're suddenly going to become a no huddle offense from what we've seen and where we are thus far. I think its far more likely that they'll work to increase the tempo i.e. get in and out of the huddle quickly, get to the line quickly with time on the playclock etc. If I were gambling on a team likely to run the type of offense some fans think we'll run (up tempo, no-huddle, with some zone-read, WCO) I would look at the Dolphins. |
|
05-14-2012, 02:09 PM | #236 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
I'm completely with you pigskin, as long as this franchise prospers I don't care who the coach is, and I was trying to get mooby on board with this line of thinking. Unfortunately we haven't been winning under this regime, and people who base their position on the facts shouldn't be considered any less loyal then people who attach themselves to this coaching staff.
|
05-14-2012, 03:29 PM | #237 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 537
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Yeah I mean I like mike shanahan. He's done things I liked an thing I hated that have not us in the ass. However I trust that he's doing his best to win and wants to win just like all of us. If the team did everything I wanted I'm
Sure we wouldn't win a SB lol so you just gotta take good with the bad and be patient. If god came to me an said the skins will never win another game, I'd still watch every Sunday bc I bleed the burgundy and gold and I think any Sunday we can beat anyone |
05-14-2012, 03:37 PM | #238 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
pardon?
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
05-14-2012, 03:48 PM | #239 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
05-14-2012, 04:22 PM | #240 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
IMO this man gets it. |
|
|
|