![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor? | |||
| Yes |
|
195 | 91.98% |
| No |
|
17 | 8.02% |
| Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Again, I just said I had mixed feelings. I think he will be a solid contributor if healthy this year and next year. I feel like they could have realized their lack of depth at this position earlier and tried to bolster this position. That's all I'm saying. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
On a side note, If both guys stay healthy, I can see Carter / Taylor combining for a good 25 sacks this year...maybe more. No longer will Carter see double teams, and if one doesn't make the QB, the other will. It's exciting to think we will create pressure.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
The measurable I would be concerned with is the 10.5 sacks he registered playing at the U (and the fact that he was a standout at the U). Anyway, time will tell... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
To clarify That Guy's bench #s: Campbell put up 8 reps at 225lbs in Jan 2008, at the combine in April he put up 16 reps at 225lbs (still the worst of all D-linemen). You make the assumption in Scenario # 2 that Campbell would be able to step in and start for Daniels today. That assumption is dead wrong, whether Campbell eventually turns into a productive player or not (he won't IMO) we would still have to fill Daniels' spot NOW even with Campbell here. And worse, what if Campbell is a bust (good probability). So now your Scenario #2 looks like this: D. Thomas, bust and/or still a need at LDE, Fred Davis, 2nd Rounder & 6th rounder.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Ask anyone who knows football about the importance of bench. Players don't lay on a bench and lift weights in the NFL - they get on a field and knock heads. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
I don't have Reggie's bench numbers but I trust Mike Golic in that he played in the NFL for several seasons and on the same DL as RW for most. He has mentioned several times that RW was an "unbelievable combination of strength and speed". If I'm not mistaken he was consistently one of the strongest, if not the strongest, on the Eagles & Packers teams he played on. LT while not a strong as White, had ridiculous speed and well above average strength. He played LB not LDE. For LDE strength is extremely important. No one is implying that you should just get the guys with the strongest bench numbers and plug them in. But if "anyone who knows football" thinks bench is unimportant, why is it done at the combine, with every NFL team in attendance. The NFL folks are pretty busy guys and wouldn't waste their time on a drill/test that is not important. I've mentioned this before also, C. Campbell's D-Line coach in 2006 is on staff at Redskins Park. If he was available at a reasonable position in the draft (he was) and the Skins didn't take him, that tells me all I need to know. Prior to the combine I was high on C. Campbell also, his size looks great, sack total looks good, but his combine performance and scouting report negatives sent up huge red flags.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I would definitely go with scenario #1. If you're looking at stats from last year -- hands down the defense was ahead of the offense. The focus was on improving the offense. We have always had a solid defense, two DE's injured on the first day of training is pretty rare. Just like last year losing two starting OL , that's pretty rare. Luckily we had cap space to sign Jason Taylor, now that's planning!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Drift Reality - Please tell me you are joking. Its apparent that everyone on the warpath knows about football, and I'm friends with a few NFL players and they workout all the time.
But to answer your questions (someone please turn this into a poll); I have no clue what Reggie White benched (God bless him) and I can only imagine that Lawrence Taylor benched about 100 kilos of crack rock and squatted about 100 prostitutes. Nate Newton even had a nice offseason workout. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 44
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
LOL. Great visual.
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
My main point is that people shouldn't get so caught up with metrics like bench reps. and clocked 40 times in my opinion. I'm not saying that good players don't work out or are not strong. That would be a ridiculous statement. Anyway, let's just drop it and we'll see what happens when they strap 'em on. Last edited by Drift Reality; 07-23-2008 at 02:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I think the bench press is one way of measuring how much upper body strength a prospect has. Moreover, upper body strength is of obvious importance to defensive linemen.
However, sometimes draft prospects underperform due to lingering injuries, or because they are just having a bad day. Moreover, some defensive ends who don't bench 225 pounds 35 times manage to do quite well against the run and the pass. Consider the below snippet about Terrell Suggs. SUGGS WORKOUT HURTS DRAFT STOCK Suggs was a dominating defensive end in the college ranks, but at 6-foot-3 3/8 and 257 pounds, which he measured in at during his workout, he probably doesn't have the size to get it done week after week in the NFL. Strength was also not on Suggs' side, as he managed just 19 reps during bench press drills. In the 40-yard dash, his times were a very pedestrian 4.84 and 4.88. He had a 33.5" vertical jump, 9-foot-0 broad jump, 32 7/8" arm length, 7.46 three-cone drill and 4.37 and 4.47 short shuttle. Whether he's just a poor workout player or what not, teams are definitely going to be forced to think twice come draft day and this workout probably pushed him out of the top five selections. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Also, upper body strength is not as critical at RDE or OLB (Suggs positions) as it is for LDE.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. Last edited by Slingin Sammy 33; 07-22-2008 at 07:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Gabe Watson also dropped to the fourth round because of poor/questionable workouts in 2006, and he's become the first round type of talent people thought he would be.
Of course, one year later, fellow Wolverine Alan Branch did the same thing, fell to the 2nd round, and his rookie year was less than promising.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
I found a video about Taylor talking about his new number. There's also a pretty entertaining one of the fans reacting to Taylor being a Redskin. Check them out on comcastsportsnet.com. Go skins!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|