|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-16-2012, 05:24 PM | #271 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
was he able to wear #47 because he was gibbler's h-back or because 80-89 were not available?
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
Advertisements |
05-16-2012, 05:34 PM | #272 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
Uniform number (American football) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
05-16-2012, 05:43 PM | #273 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
|
05-16-2012, 06:41 PM | #274 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Why not have anyone wear whatever number they want? Ive never understood the whole, "O Line is 50s and 60s, D Line is 70 and 90s, WR are 80's, QBs are 1-19, RB's are 20s and 30s, Secondary are 20's and whatever...........Who gives a shiit? I guess its the whole, "Its the way its always been done, so we can't change it" philosophy. I personally would love to see a fat ass guard wearing number 1, and a QB wearing 94. It would be awesome.
|
05-16-2012, 06:59 PM | #275 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
05-16-2012, 07:00 PM | #276 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Part of it, I think, is for ease of reference for the refs for things like eligible receivers or proper alignment.
I can see a difference for OL v backs and receivers - not sure why it matters on defense. There are probably some things applicable to DL that aren't applicable to other defensive positions but I can't think of any right now.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
05-16-2012, 07:03 PM | #277 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,570
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
I like the way it is in the NFL.
College and high school always annoyed me with the numbering. |
05-16-2012, 07:40 PM | #278 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,511
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
Fanboys want to retire his number so bad, they've taken to the web.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
05-16-2012, 07:53 PM | #279 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
but they have unofficially retired his number
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
05-16-2012, 08:10 PM | #280 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,511
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Where do you get that from? That's why there was a huge debate about if OJ was going to wear the #21.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
05-16-2012, 08:34 PM | #281 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
who was debating? i just get it from the fact that no one else has worn that number since sean took it in 2005. it's a popular number, when is the last time no one on the team wore it? it wasn't this millennium, all signs point to unofficially retired
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
05-16-2012, 08:39 PM | #282 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,511
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
O.J. Atogwe switches to No. 20 out of respect for Sean Taylor - The Insider - The Washington Post OJ was within his right to wear the #21 if he wanted, and probably could have. I don't think it's unofficially retired like the other numbers, and quite frankly doesn't deserve to be unofficially retired either. That's just my personal opinion on the matter even though many may disagree.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
05-16-2012, 08:44 PM | #283 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
that's what unofficially retired means to me, i don't know what it means to you
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
|
05-16-2012, 08:49 PM | #284 | ||
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,511
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
He did it out of respect. The Redskins Blog | OJ Atogwe Plays The Guessing Game Quote:
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
||
05-16-2012, 08:51 PM | #285 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: 2012 Redskins Free Agency (and Trades) Tracker (Chapter III)
Quote:
*edit and who was involved in the "huge debate"?
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
|
|
|