![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
For all those people who keep mindlessly saying that the D.Jax signing is "just like the old Redskins", had the team given up draft picks to pick up Sproles, that would have been an "old Redskins" move.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Garcon, Jackson, Roberts, Moss, Hankerson, Gettis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
I doubt hank makes the team he's just been too inconsistent. Guess we'll see
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Well he adds height to the group, him and Gettis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
I wouldn't be shocked if Moss gets cut now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
we'll keep 6 wrs, so DJ, PG, AR, and three more. moss, hank, AR are the best 3 left of the lot, and i think AR is the worst of those three, though moss is aging out, so there is an argument for considering him #6 if a UDFA shows big. you're #5/#6 barely play though, so it doesn't really matter. I seriously doubt hank is in any trouble, he's a reasonable #4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Quote:
That would be great in Madden but definitely overkill in real life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
His jersey will never get that dirty. Good to see him rock an uno. Make that happen!
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
No wide receiver can wear numbers 1 - 9.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Fight the power! Anyone know why? Couldn't he be listed as ST and swerve the rule that way?
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
There are loopholes, to be sure
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
we could list him as a QB and just line him up wide every play, cause... why not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,427
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Roberts, Garcon and Jackson are our starters. Any other WR on the roster has to play special teams.
Moss is dangerous returning punts and provides leadership. I don't see Hank or Robinson making the team unless they are able to find a way to make plays on ST. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|