Team Looking at OL Jonathan Goodwin, LB Keith Adams

[Big C]

rather just use clemons than sign adams to start

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Big C

rather just use clemons than sign adams to start

why? you have no gaurantees clemons is any good (if he was, lindsey would have fought for him to start like he did with marshall last year, which lead the staff to let pierce walk and not seek a replacement).

if he comes here and clemons is better, you've got a good backup. if he can't handle it, then you've got a way to fix the problem without costing yourself games.

[RedskinPete]

Originally Posted by That Guy

why? you have no gaurantees clemons is any good (if he was, lindsey would have fought for him to start like he did with marshall last year, which lead the staff to let pierce walk and not seek a replacement).

if he comes here and clemons is better, you've got a good backup. if he can't handle it, then you've got a way to fix the problem without costing yourself games.

Adams I read his Bio..... Is he a good fit in a GW defense? I just don't remember him in Philly games. I like Polley but many of you don't and he could cost to much anyway. Would he fit a GW defense?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by RedskinPete

Adams I read his Bio..... Is he a good fit in a GW defense? I just don't remember him in Philly games. I like Polley but many of you don't and he could cost to much anyway. Would he fit a GW defense?

adams is pretty average, he'd be fine though. he's not very strong (shedding blocks etc) but his speed is pretty good and he really doesn't stand out for anything good or bad.

[diehardskin2982]

I am convinced someone from the skins monitors this site, because I wrote about these guys in my next step thread!

[RedskinPete]

Originally Posted by That Guy

adams is pretty average, he'd be fine though. he's not very strong (shedding blocks etc) but his speed is pretty good and he really doesn't stand out for anything good or bad.

I would feel much better if we could find someone to fill this spot. GW defense are reliant on great LB play! This maybe a bigger spot to fill of any left!

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by RedskinPete

I would feel much better if we could find someone to fill this spot. GW defense are reliant on great LB play! This maybe a bigger spot to fill of any left!

we don't need a superstar, just someone better than holdman to pick up 50-70 tackles.

[RedskinPete]

Originally Posted by That Guy

we don't need a superstar, just someone better than holdman to pick up 50-70 tackles.

That is what I been saying as well. That spot and the 3rd CB spot as well!

[Big C]

Originally Posted by That Guy

why? you have no gaurantees clemons is any good (if he was, lindsey would have fought for him to start like he did with marshall last year, which lead the staff to let pierce walk and not seek a replacement).

if he comes here and clemons is better, you've got a good backup. if he can't handle it, then you've got a way to fix the problem without costing yourself games.

because i doubt adams is worth the money we would pay him. clemons played on almost all 3rd down packages last year for us, and is really young. if we arent going to use our 2nd round pick on a LB or sign a better free agent, id rather build from within

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Big C

because i doubt adams is worth the money we would pay him. clemons played on almost all 3rd down packages last year for us, and is really young. if we arent going to use our 2nd round pick on a LB or sign a better free agent, id rather build from within

that's nice, but if it doesn't work out, you suck at LB for 16 games. having a contigency is necessary if you're trying to go for it all right now. you don't want to lose games cause you failed to get a 2$mill SB LB after spending 50$million extra this year to make the run.