Is there a position we CAN'T draft early?

BrudLee · 04-12-2006, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfanthru&thru

c.)and I think we should pass on M's right now despite the AFD debacle and give them another year before we reevaluate where this team is going and decide if a high pick is really needed to upgrade that group when the right walk on could fill in in a pinch

Maybe it's just me, but I feel like the next starting mod might already be on the roster...

firstdown · 04-12-2006, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Be Tuat

I agree that our TE situation is not long term. Should we have the chance, I'd draft the TE from ND (don't know his name). NFL network did say he had good hands and was a blocking TE. Having said this, I still think we need more depth on OL.

I agree with you on our OL depth if we loose a player along the O line and do not have a quality back up all the off season moves may become useless. I don't think one injury would hurt us that bad but with the Oline we need to be prepared to play a game or two with 2 missing starters.

That Guy · 04-12-2006, 01:48 PM

I never really like QBs or RBs (or P/Ks :P) in the first round. RBs and QBs can have VERY short careers, whereas other positions (Especially OL/DL/CB) tend to have a better chance of sticking around and being useful.

OTs can also be reaches in the first round (for need) just like QBs...

for us, i also wouldn't consider a WR, cause they aren't that great ones this year and any guy we took would be the #5 at best this year. I wouldn't rule out safety, just in case jared allen or whitner really drops far (both are 4.4 guys and either could be like pearson and play both CB and S depending on the play).

PSUSkinsFan21 · 04-12-2006, 01:58 PM

I voted WR because I think that is our deepest position. Personally, I'd have no problem with QB because I've never been sold on Campbell. We could use depth at LB, CB, OL, and DL. Another RB (if a really promising one fell and was a bargain at 53 is always good to have......not sure we can keep Betts around as a backup forever). TE would be a waste at 53.......wouldn't mind adding TE depth in a later round though.

freddyg12 · 04-12-2006, 02:14 PM

I agree w/whoever said Fauria is a temporary solution. But, it would have to be a great TE at 53 for us to take him, cause we only need a blocking tight end & they tend to be around in later rnds.
LB & CB seem highest to me, but if o or d line players look good, we can always use them. Remember Doc is a fa next year, somebody might throw big $ at him before we can resign him.
If John McCArgo is still there at 53, he's a steal. Some have said he's a potential 1st rnd sleeper but projected to go in the 2nd. btw, he's a DT from NC st.

mcalderone10 · 04-12-2006, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I say use the first pick on the best snapper in all the land. Albright could get hurt and we could use that depth.

great idea

TheMalcolmConnection · 04-12-2006, 04:34 PM

Yes, I know. I'm smart like that.

GTripp0012 · 04-12-2006, 08:02 PM

I voted for QB, RB, WR, CB, S, K, P, and moderator. All the others need an injecton of youth, so take the player who's talents would be best used by the B & G then by any other team.

dmek25 · 04-12-2006, 08:56 PM

i want to change my vote to moderator.after thinking about it,we have a bunch of 2's and 3's,but no clearcut #1.plus we are getting old in a hurry at that position

That Guy · 04-12-2006, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dmek25

i want to change my vote to moderator.after thinking about it,we have a bunch of 2's and 3's,but no clearcut #1.plus we are getting old in a hurry at that position

yeah, and that matty guy has such a badattude... i mean, i thought I had ego problems, but man...

SmootSmack · 04-13-2006, 12:10 AM

This kind of reminds me of last year when a lot of us said "Wait, we already have Brunell and Ramsey. Why did we spend a first on another quarterback?"

Of course, I don't think people were necessarily bothered by spending the first on a QB, but the fact that we traded up to get that first"

mcalderone10 · 04-13-2006, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

This kind of reminds me of last year when a lot of us said "Wait, we already have Brunell and Ramsey. Why did we spend a first on another quarterback?"

Of course, I don't think people were necessarily bothered by spending the first on a QB, but the fact that we traded up to get that first"

yea but who's going to say Joe Gibbs did something wrong? Damn sure aint goin to be me.

Monkeydad · 04-13-2006, 01:16 PM

WR, then RB, then QB.

We should get more secondary players, maybe a LB and a kicker.

View Poll Results: Which position(s) should we NOT draft early?
Quarterback	39	67.24%
Running Back	27	46.55%
Wide Receiver	41	70.69%
Tight End	12	20.69%
Offensive Line	2	3.45%
Defensive Line	1	1.72%
Outside Linebacker	1	1.72%
Inside Linebacker	1	1.72%
Cornerback	3	5.17%
Safety	17	29.31%
Punter	17	29.31%
Kicker	17	29.31%
Moderator	22	37.93%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

04-12-2006, 01:48 PM	#18
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? I never really like QBs or RBs (or P/Ks :P) in the first round. RBs and QBs can have VERY short careers, whereas other positions (Especially OL/DL/CB) tend to have a better chance of sticking around and being useful. OTs can also be reaches in the first round (for need) just like QBs... for us, i also wouldn't consider a WR, cause they aren't that great ones this year and any guy we took would be the #5 at best this year. I wouldn't rule out safety, just in case jared allen or whitner really drops far (both are 4.4 guys and either could be like pearson and play both CB and S depending on the play).

04-12-2006, 01:58 PM	#19
PSUSkinsFan21 The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Philadelphia, PA Age: 48 Posts: 1,340	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? I voted WR because I think that is our deepest position. Personally, I'd have no problem with QB because I've never been sold on Campbell. We could use depth at LB, CB, OL, and DL. Another RB (if a really promising one fell and was a bargain at 53 is always good to have......not sure we can keep Betts around as a backup forever). TE would be a waste at 53.......wouldn't mind adding TE depth in a later round though. __________________ "Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!"

04-12-2006, 02:14 PM	#20
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? I agree w/whoever said Fauria is a temporary solution. But, it would have to be a great TE at 53 for us to take him, cause we only need a blocking tight end & they tend to be around in later rnds. LB & CB seem highest to me, but if o or d line players look good, we can always use them. Remember Doc is a fa next year, somebody might throw big $ at him before we can resign him. If John McCArgo is still there at 53, he's a steal. Some have said he's a potential 1st rnd sleeper but projected to go in the 2nd. btw, he's a DT from NC st.

04-12-2006, 04:34 PM	#22
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? Yes, I know. I'm smart like that. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

04-12-2006, 08:02 PM	#23
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 36 Posts: 15,994	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? I voted for QB, RB, WR, CB, S, K, P, and moderator. All the others need an injecton of youth, so take the player who's talents would be best used by the B & G then by any other team. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

04-12-2006, 08:56 PM	#24
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 63 Posts: 10,672	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? i want to change my vote to moderator.after thinking about it,we have a bunch of 2's and 3's,but no clearcut #1.plus we are getting old in a hurry at that position __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

04-13-2006, 12:10 AM	#26
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? This kind of reminds me of last year when a lot of us said "Wait, we already have Brunell and Ramsey. Why did we spend a first on another quarterback?" Of course, I don't think people were necessarily bothered by spending the first on a QB, but the fact that we traded up to get that first" __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

04-13-2006, 01:16 PM	#28
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 45 Posts: 17,460	Re: Is there a position we CAN'T draft early? WR, then RB, then QB. We should get more secondary players, maybe a LB and a kicker.

Is there a position we CAN'T draft early?

Locker Room Main Forum