Redskins | Contract update: B. Lloyd

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Yeah, the good thing is, he's GOT to know if he doesn't perform, he won't get that cash.

he will be huge for us this year. i kinda think of him as ricky sanders. anyone else?

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I would venture to say that if he doesn't do the trademark drops that the 9ers fans hated him for.

[amorentz]

I think he is an enormous pickup...he's been the guy Ive been clamoring for since the end of last season. Looks like a very managable contract as well, which just makes me all the happier!

[dirthogs311]

the washington times is only reporting 5 yrs. 25 mil

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by dirthogs311

the washington times is only reporting 5 yrs. 25 mil

we all know how reliable the washington area papers are. the post is the worst but i wouldnt trust the times either unless i heard it somewhere else first.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by gibbsisgod

we all know how reliable the washington area papers are. the post is the worst but i wouldnt trust the times either unless i heard it somewhere else first.

the kffl entry is unsourced... I know skins.com said 7 years though.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I would venture to say that if he doesn't do the trademark drops that the 9ers fans hated him for.

Luckily for him, Alex Smith won't be throwing those wobbly duck passes to him any more.

I think he'll work out nicely. Besides, he won't have the pressure of trying to help the team singlehandedly like he did in SF. He has plenty of help here.

Most of his drops were probably from looking at the end zone before catching the ball. San Fran didn't get close to the end zone very much, so he got anxious and didn't look the ball in.

That's my theory. I've seen clips of some GREAT plays by Lloyd. He's no Rod Gardner.

[dirthogs311]

Originally Posted by Buster

Luckily for him, Alex Smith won't be throwing those wobbly duck passes to him any more.

I think he'll work out nicely. Besides, he won't have the pressure of trying to help the team singlehandedly like he did in SF. He has plenty of help here.

Most of his drops were probably from looking at the end zone before catching the ball. San Fran didn't get close to the end zone very much, so he got anxious and didn't look the ball in.

That's my theory. I've seen clips of some GREAT plays by Lloyd. He's no Rod Gardner.

Ya I know right. I mean people in the media have been downplaying the Lloyd signing, I guess b/c of his numbers. But look who is passing the ball. I think this will be his breakout year he will probably get about 60 balls and like 7 TD's Im guessing. But if you look at his most important aspect, its his speed against Dallas secondary. WHOA

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by dirthogs311

Ya I know right. I mean people in the media have been downplaying the Lloyd signing, I guess b/c of his numbers. But look who is passing the ball. I think this will be his breakout year he will probably get about 60 balls and like 7 TD's Im guessing. But if you look at his most important aspect, its his speed against Dallas secondary. WHOA

It takes a special man to post a 8.5 QB rating. (Week 5 vs. Colts, Smith was 9 for 23 passing, 74 yds, 4 INTs and 5 sacks for -30 yds! 8.5 rating). I have NEVER seen that low of a rating.

His season QB rating was 40.8! 1 TD, 11 INTs in 9 games! 29 sacks too. They sacks aren't ALL his fault...but he could try running or throwing the ball away instead of to a defender.

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by Buster

It takes a special man to post a 8.5 QB rating. (Week 5 vs. Colts, Smith was 9 for 23 passing, 74 yds, 4 INTs and 5 sacks for -30 yds! 8.5 rating). I have NEVER seen that low of a rating.

His season QB rating was 40.8! 1 TD, 11 INTs in 9 games! 29 sacks too. They sacks aren't ALL his fault...but he could try running or throwing the ball away instead of to a defender.

he is like the kid who would just throw the ball up for grabs to keep from getting pummelled during smear the queer

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Buster

It takes a special man to post a 8.5 QB rating. (Week 5 vs. Colts, Smith was 9 for 23 passing, 74 yds, 4 INTs and 5 sacks for -30 yds! 8.5 rating). I have NEVER seen that low of a rating.

His season QB rating was 40.8! 1 TD, 11 INTs in 9 games! 29 sacks too. They sacks aren't ALL his fault...but he could try running or throwing the ball away instead of to a defender.

timmy hasslebeck posted a 0.0 vs dallas in 2003.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by That Guy

timmy hasslebeck posted a 0.0 vs dallas in 2003.

Wow...I looked it up.

6 for 26, 56 yds, 4 INTs, sacked 1 time for 4 yd loss.

Looks a LOT like Smith's line...except for the lack of sacks. Hasselbeck actually netted more yards when you factor in sacks.

That's BAD!!!!!!!

I wonder how many 0.0 rating games there have been ever.

[Monkeydad]

Can't find anything on that, but I do see that Kordell Stewart had THREE of them in 2004 and 2005...the only 3 games he played...ALL 0.0 rating games!

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Buster

Can't find anything on that, but I do see that Kordell Stewart had THREE of them in 2004 and 2005...the only 3 games he played...ALL 0.0 rating games!

stewart could run and catch passes though.

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by Buster

Can't find anything on that, but I do see that Kordell Stewart had THREE of them in 2004 and 2005...the only 3 games he played...ALL 0.0 rating games!

and to think that Cowher had him starting for years