![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
Do you really think that NFL really believes that every male at 21 suddenly transforms into Mother Theresa? Come on. We can agree to disagree, but I think the league is hiding behind this excuse, so they can set up a rule that will keep them in good the NCAA. Each team should choose which players they want or don't want, not the league. Your argument implies the league "suits" think they know more about player talent evaluation and whether they are ready for the NFL than the scouts and coaches. I don't think that Paul Tagliabue knows more about college players that are ready for the NFL than a scout or coach...do you?. You say, "since deciding matters on a case-by-case basis isn't feasible (operationally or legally), the arbitrary rules stand." Each NFL team already decide on a case by case basis if they want a certain player or not. Legally? What is illegal about each NFL teams deciding on a case by case basis if they want to draft a player or not? |
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
You are right the NFL has a huge altruistic past. They are not in it for the money, they want to make everyone else better person. :confused: Wow, we can really agree to disagree. The NFL has a huge history of treating its past players poorly. It was not until the late 70's that the multi-billion dollar NFL started to take care of past great players. Players did not start to make big money until free agency started in the 80's. Owners and the league were pocketing millions while paying their players small amonts, in comparision to the profits that the league and its players were bringing in. It took several player strikes to get the the greedy owners to share in the profits. Are you actually lecturing me that NFL, its owners and the NCAA are altruistic. The NFl and the NCAA are not providing the funding for all of this, the NFL and NCAA fans and supporters are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Just something to ponder here:
Who is paying for Clarett's lawyers? Or are these guys doing it "pro bono"? If they re "running a tab" for Maurice, I suggest he damned well better get himself a fat contract one of these days soon because lawyers of this type charge $600 - 700 an hour where I come from and they have to have several hundred hours on the tab already. Do the math folks... |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartselle, Alabama
Age: 85
Posts: 659
|
Maybe Defensewins is kicking in $$ for Clarett's lawyers LOL. Seems like he has a MAJOR ax to grind with the NFL and NCAA.
A couple points, if you can try to think rarionally for just a second. You are arguing from both sides. First you blame the NFL/NCAA system for causing untold harm. Then, when a valid point is made that the NFL/NCAA system actually does a tremendous amount of GOOD, you dismiss it, because the fans put up the money that the NFL/NCAA football generates. DUH!!! What difference does that make? Sounds like you are now saying your issues with the system are the fault of the FANS. We were discussing the system. If you don't want to put up your money, you don't have to. In fact, with your totally negative attitude toward the NFL, why are you here??? The Redskins ARE the NFL, along with 31 other like-minded partners. One last thing. You did not get the reference to slavery. I will spell it out for you parochially. Your statements were so anti-NFL, and so bleeding-heart pitious of the poor offended players. Slavery has historically been the next step for players with this radical point of view. I was just pointing out the direction your remarks had taken.
__________________
John Shaffer National Fantasy Sports Leagues, Inc. Home of "The BEST Game In Town" since 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |||
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Sports: I heard a rumor they were working for free to get exposure. Not sure if you can hold anything against a rumor. If not, you're right, he needs a job, and soon! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Daseal:
I checked the Preamble to the US Consitution and it says nothing at all about "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness". I'll be happy to type in the Preamble for you here if you would like... However, that phrase does appear in the Declaration of Independence. Unfortunately, the Declaration of Independence has no force of law; it predates the Constitution by about 15 years. If everyone had a Constitutional right to work in their chosen field, then there would be no legal basis for licensing surgeons or airline pilots or school bus drivers. Hell, in Virginia you have to have a license to open a salon that does nails. And in this respect, one is not presumed to be competent until proven otherwise. You don't get to perform abdominal surgery on patients until a certain fraction of them die horrible deaths and then you get "cut from the roster". In far more erudite language, I'm told that this is part of the NFL's argument and that it is one of the parts that resonated with the appeals court panel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
The player's should be greatfull that these colleges give these ball player's an opportunity to make thousands even million's of dollar's? Then why aren't they pushing for clarett? I will tell you why, they don't mind if a kid makes million's, so long as they have had an opportunity to milk his talent for as long as possible, so they can make thousand's off of him, as DW said and I have said before, these colleges could care less for these kid's, if they cared they wouldn't punish them if they deciede to come back to school after they may have signed with an agent, and the fact that they are disallowing william's to come back is garbage, I don't care what they told him before the NFL appealed, Clarett didn't play by the rules and was ostracized, william's did play by the rules, and now they are sticking it to him, to deter any one else from leaving. Why does clarett need a supplemental draft? If he win's he could be a free agent, everyone in the NFL say's Clarett will go in the 4th rd., but aren't those the same guy's who said julius jones is the 6th maybe 7th best back in the draft? the kid in his freshman year was arguably the best back in the nation, and won a national title, this kid is a far better talent than lawerence phillip's could ever dream to be, does he have the head for it? Who know's? It look's like to me he really is not interested in school, and want's to make some money, if he's truly not ready for the NFL then why not let him enter the draft? nobody will draft him and he will have learned his lesson, so what's the big deal? I will tell you, he is ready for the NFL, and the last thing the NFL or colleges want is a successful 19 year old showing other's the way. Joe R you said this kid will be bagging groceries, so I guess staying in college will land him on wall street, daseal's right save college for those who actually use it to thier advantage, these kid's are there for 1 reason only to make the college money, and save money on a farm league for the NFL, if a kid want's to realize his dream a little early, he should have that opportunity. also Joe R. be careful how you talk about people who bag groceries, you could be refering to the next league and SB MVP! see Kurt Warner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Sports. you're right. I'm sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Quote:
And by the way, just heard hell has actually frozen over - Daseal and Offiss agreeing on something?? Who'd a thunk it?! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
haha
Offiss and I often agree - provided it's not a chat about politics! |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Daseal - no one is denying Clarett his right to play football - there are several venues to do just that. The argument seems to be whether he has the right to play in the NFL, rather than the CFL, Arena League, or some other less glamorous venue - for one year.
I agree that the rule is arbitrary and has little basis as to whether a player is "ready" for the NFL. You have to agree that deciding whether each player individually is ready is, to say the least, logistically problematic. It would also leave the league open to hundreds of lawsuits from players told to wait a year. So this arbitrary rule is how they've chosen to defend the league from players whose maturity might be outshined by their 40 times, and therefore weaken the product.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
offiss:
If teams only drafted players ready to play in the NFL ,there would be no disastrously bad picks. Ryan Leaf would have been an undrafted free agent; same with Rick Mirer and same with that big stud offensive tackle that was drafted by Green Bay who stunk on a bagel (can't remember his name at the moment). There is a thread here asking if several current Redskins were "wasted picks". If you assertion were correct and only players ready to play were taken, no such thread would ever need to be started. Clarett can protect himself against a career ending injury with an insurance policy. Even the NCAA, which hates to admit that athletes get certain bennies that other students do not, will allow this and allow him to retain eligibility. (Where can he get the money? From the same place that he is getting the money to pay his lawyers.) Problem is that Clarett tossed his eligibility in the ashcan when he stopped going to class to maintain academic eligibility. So now that kind of policy is not really open to him. Clarett chose to put all his eggs in one basket. Notice I said he CHOSE to do that; no one put a gun to his head and made him do it against his will. Then he forgot to keep a careful eye on the basket... |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
I do have a problem when the NFL makes a blanket rule like every adult under 21 is not ready for the NFL. There are many 21 year olds and older who are not ready for the NFL. Also, I did not say the 'NFL /NCAA system has caused untold harm'. I was just responding to someone that was implying the NFL is pure and altruistic in its policies and ways. I was just pointing out the NFL in its past has not always been perfect, charitable and clean cut as it is today. I am sorry you think these points to my argument are so radical to you. LOL You act like it is treasonous for me speak out against the NFL, when in my opinion they did something wrong. This is still America right? I can speak out against the NFL when I think they are being unfair? You do not need to attack me personally by calling my argument "so anti-NFL, and so bleeding-heart pitious (sp?)...(You go on to say) "Slavery has historically been the next step for players with this radical point of view. I was just pointing out the direction your remarks had taken." Wow next you are going to call me a nothern-er/yankee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
I have to say about player's being ready, the question is not if he's talented enough, but whether or not he is physically ready, although there are plenty of bust's, it's usually because they are not talented enough, the case with underclassmen is they are not physically ready for the NFL, and I can see the point trying to be made, it's not unreasonable, but you have to admit there is alway's an exception to the rule, we all know not everybody mature's at the same rate, some guy's are much further along than other's, why should they be held back? I believe it's nothing more than college's losing the draw of star power, thus losing out on a lot of money, did Clarett bring this on himself? Absolutly, but that doesn't mean he's wrong, many people have challenged the establishment when they felt there was an injustes, Curt Flood opened the way for free agency, was he wrong? And I feel this situation with Clarett is a minor ripple in the rule changes, that really won't affect that much either way, I just feel it's not right if a kid is not smart enough to go to college, that he should be punished for it, and not allow to pursue another venue of income in the NFL. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|