|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-06-2006, 04:11 PM | #16 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Yeah I agree, most people dont realize how good Portis actually is.
__________________
Vacancy |
Advertisements |
12-06-2006, 04:23 PM | #17 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
What about how low Campbell has to squat under center? That has to slow him down even more. He has to go from that position into his back pedal, and then the long wind up to pass the ball. The pass protection has to be perfect to allow that much time from Center - QB exchange to Campbell passing.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
12-06-2006, 04:48 PM | #18 | |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Quote:
__________________
Vacancy |
|
12-06-2006, 04:49 PM | #19 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
.
__________________
Vacancy |
12-06-2006, 05:10 PM | #20 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Doug Williams was tall and never had to squat that low...and he had a similar wind up. I wonder if there is anyway of training Casey to not squat so low or if maybe he is just a short guy to begin with? Brunell had the same problem as well.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
12-07-2006, 05:47 AM | #21 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
maybe a lower center makes for a better snap/exchange?
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
12-07-2006, 05:48 AM | #22 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
I know our coach was always yelling....get ur butt down before you catch a cold...
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
12-07-2006, 09:34 AM | #23 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Cutler has to do the same thing in Denver with Tom Nalen. Nalen also sets up pretty low.
Not sure what you can do about it. Do you really want the center to change his stance? Rabach is on the tall side for a center (6-4), so I'm sure the main reason his stance is low is for leverage purposes. |
12-07-2006, 09:49 AM | #24 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Quote:
|
|
12-07-2006, 09:59 AM | #25 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dumfries, VA
Age: 71
Posts: 241
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
At the risk of being branded a Redskins heretic, JC is still a project. I hope he develops into a hall of fame quarterback for the Redskins; however, he is not playing well now.
We can list all the excuses for this that might make us feel better, but the bottom line is that we have a novice NFL QB that is not rocking the NFL world right now. |
12-07-2006, 11:34 AM | #26 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PG county
Posts: 32
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
If the ran a couple of screens ATL would of had to calm down on there blitzes. When I say screen passes I'm talking about screens to the RB.
__________________
Check out www.demskins.com. A skins blog for the true skins fan! |
12-07-2006, 11:44 AM | #27 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
I don't know, you could be right. Probably makes it better for the Center, but it just seems like it would be harder for a quarterback to drop back as fast as he needs to. Notice how Vick doesn't seem to get nearly as low and has one leg out behind. As soon as the ball is snaped he's in much better position to drop back to pass or to run with it.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
12-07-2006, 11:51 AM | #28 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
Yeah, not sure why we didnt run screens or that quick slant once they started blitzing
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
12-07-2006, 12:05 PM | #29 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
I know we tried one screen that just looked horrible from the get go, but I think it might have been a screen to Mike Sellers or Cooley and not Betts. I can't remember though.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
12-07-2006, 12:09 PM | #30 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
|
Re: Not enough protection for Campbell along with Campbell's inexperience=offensive w
The playaction was really slowing the development of the plays, and with their all out blitzing scheme, the PA shoulda been thrown out the window in the second half.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|