Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-22-2007, 01:12 PM   #16
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
I look for the QB situation to remain pretty much the same. Brunell will restructure and back up Campbell, and Todd Collins will remain to do whatever it is he does, because I can't imagine his services's being in demand anywhere else.
Yeah I agree.

Brunell's days as a starter in this league are over. He's not going to receive any interest out there, so his best case scenario is to be the backup here. He realizes this and he's basically already conceded that his best option is to stay here as the backup. I think they'll work out a restructure to keep him on.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-22-2007, 01:24 PM   #17
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,338
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

This is a meaningless thread because Brunell is not going to be cut. Every indication is he's coming back and they want him back.

So it's JC #1 and I would say Brunell #2 or Collins and Brunell will compete for #2.

All I gotta say is I hope JC stays healthy.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 01:28 PM   #18
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

I say we keep Brunell. As a backup, he can stay healthy and can come in and win a game for us. Collins has no history of success.

Brunell is effient and knows the system. We CAN win with him as long as the defense plays somewhat good, not like in 2006. He'll be fresh instead of banged-up and we can rely on him for a few games if needed. If we have to start Collins, we're screwed.

Besides, if we're going to have a down-the-field attack with Campbell, bringing in a QB with a completely different playing style can throw a defense off their game plan and film study and could be a big benefit to us. He'll be dumping passes off to a healthy Portis and he CAN throw deep to Moss if needed. He's not as bad as we all said he was when we were clamoring for Campbell to get a shot.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 01:32 PM   #19
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
This is a meaningless thread because Brunell is not going to be cut. Every indication is he's coming back and they want him back.

So it's JC #1 and I would say Brunell #2 or Collins and Brunell will compete for #2.

All I gotta say is I hope JC stays healthy.

It's the offseason...without a majority of our threads being meaningless, we'd be bored!
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 01:41 PM   #20
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,338
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
It's the offseason...without a majority of our threads being meaningless, we'd be bored!
Very true. Thank god I have NFL Network.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 02:14 PM   #21
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea View Post
Let's just assume that Mark Brunell is released, where do the Skins go? Everyone knows that Joe Gibbs loves veteran backups. There will be a few guys available, I'd like to bring up a few Drew Bledsoe and Joey Harrington.

Last year was a bad year for Drew, but he can still play...a little. I don't think he's as bad as he played last year, but I think he'd be a decent insurance policy.

Joey Harrington, on the other hand, had the first good year of his career last year. He wasn't great, but he's not going to be a starter (we hope). I think he'd be a very quality backup.

The main reason I'm bringing them up is because either should come really cheap and not cost the frachise however much Brunell's going to. If Mark doesn't restructure, he needs to be released and then they need to look for someone not named Todd Collins.
They won't be releasing MB!!
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 02:21 PM   #22
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

I think Brunell will be the backup. I wouldn't mind only keeping 2 QBs on the roster with ARE acting as the emergency #3 QB.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 02:22 PM   #23
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

diehardskin:

If the Redskins actually drafted Chris Leak, do you think the Wash Post would have the chops to do a headline:


Skins Take A Leak In Round One

Just asking...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 04:04 PM   #24
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 04:11 PM   #25
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
No.

Maybe we could convert him to WR though?

__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 04:12 PM   #26
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
No.

Maybe we could convert him to WR though?

Or CB :cheeky-sm
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 04:57 PM   #27
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

leak won't go in the 1st
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 05:13 PM   #28
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,338
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
YES!!!!!!!

He's got game experience, he had several good years in NO and he has much better skills than anyone behind JC.

Just becasue someone knows Al's system does not mean they get an automatic roster spot. That ridicules. I would bring him here in a heartbeat.
skinsfan69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 05:31 PM   #29
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
YES!!!!!!!

He's got game experience, he had several good years in NO and he has much better skills than anyone behind JC.

Just becasue someone knows Al's system does not mean they get an automatic roster spot. That ridicules. I would bring him here in a heartbeat.
NO!!!!!!!

He's stunk it up at every stop in his career. True, we wouldn't be starting him, but why bring in someone as a backup that has proven he's not an NFL quarterback? The point of a backup QB is not to just fill an open roster spot, it's to keep the team competitive if the starter is lost. Brooks can not do that.

Collins can't either.

Brunell can if healthy though.


Randel El as an emergency QB would be ideal. If we get down to him, we can always sign an unemployed QB...there are plenty of them. Rarely does a 3rd QB see the field anyways. This would also allow us to keep an extra DB on the roster...something we could've used last year.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2007, 05:36 PM   #30
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
This one is tough for me. The upside would be that Brooks is still young (31), and has played at a high level for a number of years (21+ TD passes in 4 out of his 7 seasons as a full time starter). Plus he has a similar skill set to JC - strong arm, pass first, but quick and elusive when necessary. And he'll never be cheaper than he will this offseason. You could have JC, Brooks, Collins in that order.

The downside is that Brooks has been interception prone, and just finished getting his ego shoved down his throat for a season with Oakland. There is a reason he has been cut two seasons in a row. Plus the times that Brunell plays terribly are when he wears down physically and gets knicked. If he is serving in a backup role, he'll be fresh if needed. Bringing back JC, Brunell, and Collins will give us 3 guys who are veterans of Saunders system. And Brunell is a respected leader in the locker room.

Flip a coin...
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 4.59127 seconds with 10 queries