|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-22-2007, 01:12 PM | #16 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
Quote:
Brunell's days as a starter in this league are over. He's not going to receive any interest out there, so his best case scenario is to be the backup here. He realizes this and he's basically already conceded that his best option is to stay here as the backup. I think they'll work out a restructure to keep him on. |
|
Advertisements |
02-22-2007, 01:24 PM | #17 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,338
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
This is a meaningless thread because Brunell is not going to be cut. Every indication is he's coming back and they want him back.
So it's JC #1 and I would say Brunell #2 or Collins and Brunell will compete for #2. All I gotta say is I hope JC stays healthy. |
02-22-2007, 01:28 PM | #18 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
I say we keep Brunell. As a backup, he can stay healthy and can come in and win a game for us. Collins has no history of success.
Brunell is effient and knows the system. We CAN win with him as long as the defense plays somewhat good, not like in 2006. He'll be fresh instead of banged-up and we can rely on him for a few games if needed. If we have to start Collins, we're screwed. Besides, if we're going to have a down-the-field attack with Campbell, bringing in a QB with a completely different playing style can throw a defense off their game plan and film study and could be a big benefit to us. He'll be dumping passes off to a healthy Portis and he CAN throw deep to Moss if needed. He's not as bad as we all said he was when we were clamoring for Campbell to get a shot. |
02-22-2007, 01:32 PM | #19 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
Quote:
It's the offseason...without a majority of our threads being meaningless, we'd be bored! |
|
02-22-2007, 01:41 PM | #20 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,338
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
|
02-22-2007, 02:14 PM | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
Quote:
|
|
02-22-2007, 02:21 PM | #22 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
I think Brunell will be the backup. I wouldn't mind only keeping 2 QBs on the roster with ARE acting as the emergency #3 QB.
|
02-22-2007, 02:22 PM | #23 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
diehardskin:
If the Redskins actually drafted Chris Leak, do you think the Wash Post would have the chops to do a headline: Skins Take A Leak In Round One Just asking...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
02-22-2007, 04:04 PM | #24 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
Raiders just cut Aaron Brooks. Would you guys consider him?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
02-22-2007, 04:11 PM | #25 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
No.
Maybe we could convert him to WR though? |
02-22-2007, 04:12 PM | #26 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
|
02-22-2007, 04:57 PM | #27 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
leak won't go in the 1st
__________________
That got ugly fast |
02-22-2007, 05:13 PM | #28 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,338
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
YES!!!!!!!
He's got game experience, he had several good years in NO and he has much better skills than anyone behind JC. Just becasue someone knows Al's system does not mean they get an automatic roster spot. That ridicules. I would bring him here in a heartbeat. |
02-22-2007, 05:31 PM | #29 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
Quote:
He's stunk it up at every stop in his career. True, we wouldn't be starting him, but why bring in someone as a backup that has proven he's not an NFL quarterback? The point of a backup QB is not to just fill an open roster spot, it's to keep the team competitive if the starter is lost. Brooks can not do that. Collins can't either. Brunell can if healthy though. Randel El as an emergency QB would be ideal. If we get down to him, we can always sign an unemployed QB...there are plenty of them. Rarely does a 3rd QB see the field anyways. This would also allow us to keep an extra DB on the roster...something we could've used last year. |
|
02-22-2007, 05:36 PM | #30 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Backup QB's (assuming Brunell's cut)
This one is tough for me. The upside would be that Brooks is still young (31), and has played at a high level for a number of years (21+ TD passes in 4 out of his 7 seasons as a full time starter). Plus he has a similar skill set to JC - strong arm, pass first, but quick and elusive when necessary. And he'll never be cheaper than he will this offseason. You could have JC, Brooks, Collins in that order.
The downside is that Brooks has been interception prone, and just finished getting his ego shoved down his throat for a season with Oakland. There is a reason he has been cut two seasons in a row. Plus the times that Brunell plays terribly are when he wears down physically and gets knicked. If he is serving in a backup role, he'll be fresh if needed. Bringing back JC, Brunell, and Collins will give us 3 guys who are veterans of Saunders system. And Brunell is a respected leader in the locker room. Flip a coin... |
|
|