05-08-2007, 02:32 PM | #16 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
And knowing is half the battle...
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
Advertisements |
05-08-2007, 02:35 PM | #17 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
*this probably wont stay on youtube for very long.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
05-08-2007, 02:37 PM | #18 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
HAHA!
"Question?! WHICH...BEAR...IS BEST?"
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
05-08-2007, 02:41 PM | #19 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
That's a ridiculous question.
Question, who will be better against the run: Taylor or Landry?
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
05-08-2007, 02:43 PM | #20 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
Michael!
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
05-08-2007, 02:44 PM | #21 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
Seriously though, something tells me that Landry is going to be the player we all THOUGHT ST was supposed to be. That's unfortunate, but we COULD do worse than to have an awesome safety and a great one.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
05-08-2007, 02:48 PM | #22 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
NFL Draft News - 35k
googled it and came from NFL Draft news, its a pay site though
__________________
That got ugly fast |
05-08-2007, 02:50 PM | #23 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
Prior to the draft I didn't read all that much on Landry, and I guess I sort of assumed he was more like a hard-hitting CB. I thought he'd be great against the deep ball and only so-so against the run.
Now that I've become more versed on him I agree with you that he seems very similar to Taylor. That article on him in the post had the quote from his HS coach that said something like "if he had to choose between grabbing an INT for a touchdown or putting a guy in the hospital he'd have a hard time making up his mind." That sounds a lot like Taylor's attitude, IMO. I just hope we don't have another situation where both of them seem more concerned with making the highlight hit than covering the pass. I don't think that will happen, but there's always a chance.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
05-08-2007, 02:58 PM | #24 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,555
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
I think the key for the defense will be establishing an offensive identity and having sustained drives and keeping the D off the field and rested. Last year, that rarely happened. And until we decide whether we're a flashy Al Saunders offense or a smash-mouth Joe Gibbs offense, we will not establish that identity.
I suspect that last year's gravitation toward the Gibbs offense will ultimately be permanent, although there's still the matter of that 700 page playbook that we have all heard WAY too much about and the prospect of Saunders calling plays. Until this is ironed out, I think it will mean too many 3-and-outs and having our D on the field too much. Having said all that, I do think we've upgraded on D (hell, getting rid of ArchDeluxe was itself an upgrade), although I do think we still need improvement on the D-line. But there's no doubt we should be better. The question is how much, and I think that whether we can hold the ball on offense will be a big factor. |
05-08-2007, 03:05 PM | #25 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
I could see us being #15 in total yds. (usually the category that the d is ranked on). That seems realistic, yet sill optimistic as that's a big jump from 31.
I don't think we're a shut down dominating d at all, we will still give up some big plays. I think the difference will be in playmaking; turnovers! You don't have to be the most dominant d if you can make big plays & I look for more of them to happen. Similar to our 05 d, it wasn't as good as 04 but they made some big plays. |
05-08-2007, 03:07 PM | #26 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: IL
Age: 39
Posts: 39
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
Quote:
Does someone care to help me out...? |
|
05-08-2007, 03:20 PM | #27 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
finally, a positive thread. i also think our defense will be much improved. when healthy, the skins boast a hard hitting, ball hawking, gang tackling bunch. this also might be a tryout for Greg Williams resume, because if the skins defense falters again this year, Dan Snyder might want to rethink our next head coach
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
05-08-2007, 03:23 PM | #28 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 42
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
Really, we have nowhere to go but up. We were just about the worst defense in the league last year. It shouldn't be too difficult to improve. Just the fact that we're healthy should put us into the top 20. A few more turnovers, and we could be top 15.
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
05-08-2007, 03:23 PM | #29 | |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
Quote:
Arron Kampman DE of greenbay 5th round, Mark Anderson DE Chicago 5th round Kevin Kaesviharn safety of the saints 6 ints most among safeties~undrafted So Yes I feel i can put alot on measurables because where your drafted doesn't mean anything. Talent is talent. Fight in the Dog!
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
05-08-2007, 03:29 PM | #30 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 54
|
Re: Why the 2007 defense will be in the top 10
Quote:
|
|
|
|