Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle

RobH4413 · 08-30-2007, 11:00 PM

Who knows... with our track record...we'll end up drafting a stud and potentially starter a couple of years down the road.

Godspeed Brunell. You had a great career with us. Let's see what we can do in 07 Campbell.

MTK · 08-30-2007, 11:03 PM

Not so sure I like the sound of this, I would still feel much better starting MB over Collins if JC were to go down.

But hey, at least this will eliminate the ridiculous thinking that Gibbs couldn't wait to get his church buddy back on the field at any cost!

70Chip · 08-30-2007, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Not so sure I like the sound of this, I would still feel much better starting MB over Collins if JC were to go down.

But hey, at least this will eliminate the ridiculous thinking that Gibbs couldn't wait to get his church buddy back on the field at any cost!

I doubt it will go away so easily. That's a devoted little fellowship of (non)believers there.

And I agree about Collins. If I were a defensive coordinator I would be drooling like one of Pavlov's dogs at the prospect of facing Collins. And Palmer, he's a clipboard man all the way.

MTK · 08-30-2007, 11:04 PM

How is Seneca Wallace moving to TE at 5'11, 205??

Maybe WR?

KLHJ2 · 08-30-2007, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

How is Seneca Wallace moving to TE at 5'11, 205??

Maybe WR?

I was questioning that part myself. But that is what they are reporting. I think that they mean WR, however they have said it more than twice.

Edit: I wonder if they were in the trade talks when they locked up Seneca for another 5 years, and if that was Seattle's plan all along.

hooskins · 08-30-2007, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

How is Seneca Wallace moving to TE at 5'11, 205??

Maybe WR?

yeah that was a big WTF for me...

mooby · 08-30-2007, 11:06 PM

He might have bulked up over the offseason. Still, he's played wide receiver in the past so I wouldn't be suprised if they just moved him to WR instead of TE. They keep saying he will be moved to TE though.

Lady Brave · 08-30-2007, 11:13 PM

I'm not sure how I feel about this. I think it's a risky move. I haven't seen Palmer play, but if he's as bad as you guys say, we may have to put ARE in as our #3... doh!

KLHJ2 · 08-30-2007, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Brave

I'm not sure how I feel about this. I think it's a risky move. I haven't seen Palmer play, but if he's as bad as you guys say, we may have to put ARE in as our #3... doh!

I hear Quincy Carter is looking for a NFL job. What better way to get back at Dallas than as the Redskins number 3? LOL!

Edit. In all seriousness Chris Simms is on the bubble in Tampa Bay.

DynamiteRave · 08-30-2007, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lady Brave

I'm not sure how I feel about this. I think it's a risky move. I haven't seen Palmer play, but if he's as bad as you guys say, we may have to put ARE in as our #3... doh!

Hey, ARE at QB?
That might not be a totally bad thing. I mean he didn't start playing WR till he was drafted anyway.

freddyg12 · 08-30-2007, 11:23 PM

nice joke, or maybe not such a nice joke. I'll leave that to the WP mods et al.

The 2nd post on this thread included a quote, but that quote wasn't from the 1st post. Hmmm....

skinsnut · 08-30-2007, 11:29 PM

We need some proof here.
Like a link or something.
This just doesn't jive...expecially after the the QB performances tonight.

KLHJ2 · 08-30-2007, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsnut

We need some proof here.
Like a link or something.
This just doesn't jive...expecially after the the QB performances tonight.

What part of it was on live television after the game did you not understand? There is no link. They are still talking about it now. The deal is not done yet, however they are still talking about it as we speak.

GMScud · 08-30-2007, 11:37 PM

Maybe the thinking is to move Brunell while we can still get something for him. We didn't want to trade any future draft picks for 08-09 but were forced to b/c of the guard situation presenting a need for a guy like Kendall. By trading MB we could recoup that pick. Also, it doesn't necessarily mean we are set on Palmer as a 3rd. He could be relegated to the practice squad, still learn the offense, and we could pick up a vet off the waiver wire after this weekends cuts. Just a thought. And they HAVE to mean Wallace is moving to WR. TE isn't possible at his size.

Pocket$ $traight · 08-30-2007, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angryssg

What part of it was on live television after the game did you not understand? There is no link. They are still talking about it now. The deal is not done yet, however they are still talking about it as we speak.

If it isn't on the internet, it can't be true!

08-30-2007, 11:00 PM	#1
RobH4413 Wildcard Bitches Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Bethesda, MD Age: 41 Posts: 2,638	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle Who knows... with our track record...we'll end up drafting a stud and potentially starter a couple of years down the road. Godspeed Brunell. You had a great career with us. Let's see what we can do in 07 Campbell. __________________ This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!

08-30-2007, 11:03 PM	#2
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,049	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle Not so sure I like the sound of this, I would still feel much better starting MB over Collins if JC were to go down. But hey, at least this will eliminate the ridiculous thinking that Gibbs couldn't wait to get his church buddy back on the field at any cost! __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

08-30-2007, 11:04 PM	#4
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,049	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle How is Seneca Wallace moving to TE at 5'11, 205?? Maybe WR? __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

08-30-2007, 11:06 PM	#7
mooby Hug Anne Spyder Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 20,596	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle He might have bulked up over the offseason. Still, he's played wide receiver in the past so I wouldn't be suprised if they just moved him to WR instead of TE. They keep saying he will be moved to TE though. __________________ Hail to the Football Team

08-30-2007, 11:13 PM	#8
Lady Brave The Starter Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Trinity, NC Age: 54 Posts: 1,444	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle I'm not sure how I feel about this. I think it's a risky move. I haven't seen Palmer play, but if he's as bad as you guys say, we may have to put ARE in as our #3... doh!

08-30-2007, 11:23 PM	#11
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle nice joke, or maybe not such a nice joke. I'll leave that to the WP mods et al. The 2nd post on this thread included a quote, but that quote wasn't from the 1st post. Hmmm....

08-30-2007, 11:29 PM	#12
skinsnut Playmaker Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 3,059	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle We need some proof here. Like a link or something. This just doesn't jive...expecially after the the QB performances tonight. __________________ I hate Dallas...Period

08-30-2007, 11:37 PM	#14
GMScud Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 12,626	Re: Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle Maybe the thinking is to move Brunell while we can still get something for him. We didn't want to trade any future draft picks for 08-09 but were forced to b/c of the guard situation presenting a need for a guy like Kendall. By trading MB we could recoup that pick. Also, it doesn't necessarily mean we are set on Palmer as a 3rd. He could be relegated to the practice squad, still learn the offense, and we could pick up a vet off the waiver wire after this weekends cuts. Just a thought. And they HAVE to mean Wallace is moving to WR. TE isn't possible at his size. __________________ Tardy

Rumor: Brunell heading to Seattle

Locker Room Main Forum