Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2007, 01:37 PM   #16
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
He is young and going to make mistakes but they noted the skins have only one redzone threat...Cooley. Well guess what..these teams know that. After that who else? His sources say JC really needs a big WR threat to become more effective.
This was me a few days ago in another thread:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw
Cooley has size and strength, and he is the best receiving threat in the red zone, but the problem is every team in the league knows that. Every time Campbell went to Cooley in the endzone yesterday, he was triple covered. I'm actually surprised that Cooley was able to have such good receiving numbers, since there were Bills drapped all over him, all day long.

But Washington still needs a true possession receiver. A big receiver with good hands that can bail Campbell out when his passes are a foot or two off the mark. Something which Santana Moss seems unable to do. I don't know how or where they'll find this guy, but they need to do it ASAP.
It's not rocket science. Every team in the league has figured out that Cooley is the only legitimate red zone threat. And yet the coaching staff hasn't done anything to combat this situation.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-05-2007, 02:14 PM   #17
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texanskin View Post
I really want to see this Mix dude.
If he is a bust then....well we did pay vertually nothing for him.lol.
I am curious to see him in action
Agreed. I said this after the JC INT at the end of the TB game. We have a 6'5" receiver. Throw him the damn fade, not to a 5'9" Moss. If the guy is no good then don't keep him around or put him on the practice squad, but give him a chance.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 02:42 PM   #18
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

I really don't know much about Mix. However, he was dumped by the NYG. Sometimes people, mis-evaluate talent but usually not. I don't think he is the answer.

Someone alluded to last year or earlier this year being pretty good in the red zone. We were good when our oline was intact at the end of last year and could run it and we were good til teams "figured it out" and started doubling Cooley earlier this year.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 02:56 PM   #19
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,568
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by rypper11 View Post
Moss seems like another player with his new shoes. Hopefully he'll connect a few times downfield Thursday.
Yeah but they still don't seem to be sending him deep. Even with the altered shoe he's not 100%.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 03:15 PM   #20
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
I really don't know much about Mix. However, he was dumped by the NYG. Sometimes people, mis-evaluate talent but usually not. I don't think he is the answer.
I don't know if you remember, but Ricky Sanders was a NE castoff. We know what he did afterwards with us.
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 03:27 PM   #21
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
I really don't know much about Mix. However, he was dumped by the NYG. Sometimes people, mis-evaluate talent but usually not. I don't think he is the answer.
From the info I read on him, the Giants liked him, but the only WR spot he played was the X, which for the Giants is Plaxico Burress. It also appeared the NYG fans weren't happy with him being let go. I'm not saying he is the singular solution to our Red Zone woes, but when you have a 6'5" WR matched up against a 5'10" corner you have to take a shot at a fade. Even if Mix doesn't make the play, it may force the defense to adjust or shift, which may open Cooley or someone else. DBs are always taught to take away the slant inside the 10, and if you have short WRs the DBs can really cheat on the slant because the fade is extremely difficult to throw to a shorter WR.

Based on where we are with our WR corps right now we need to find out if this kid can make plays. If he can great, we found a WR. If not, we will at least have had a chance to evaluate if he can develop and is worth keeping around. He also played with Campbell at Auburn and JC lobbied to get him here. It would go far in showing confidence in JC by giving Mix a chance.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 03:33 PM   #22
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

all we need is a tall receiver. yeah right. the answer to everything. to me, size has nothing to do with getting open. it seems to me that Steve Smith scores his share of touchdowns. whats he? all of 5' 9". Marvin Harrison scores a bunch,. and he is barely 6 foot tall. our line is the problem. once in the red zone, it always seems like Campbell is running for his life. we need to see more of Portis in the red zone. if anything, he has the knack for finding pay dirt
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 03:41 PM   #23
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
all we need is a tall receiver. yeah right. the answer to everything. to me, size has nothing to do with getting open. it seems to me that Steve Smith scores his share of touchdowns. whats he? all of 5' 9". Marvin Harrison scores a bunch,. and he is barely 6 foot tall. our line is the problem. once in the red zone, it always seems like Campbell is running for his life. we need to see more of Portis in the red zone. if anything, he has the knack for finding pay dirt
Good points. It seems like the smaller recievers Harrison, Smith catch alot of their td passes by big plays (not all, but alot). Big plays...meaning 25 yards or more. We have a problem w/ that too no doubt.

I don't disclude smaller recievers it just seems like the bigger WR are better threats to score when the ball is in the red zone. Just my opinion. I think what other teams said was our lack of a big play WR hindering JC, not necessarily a big WR. I do think a big talented play making receiver would be a tremendous benefit. They don't grow on trees though.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 03:41 PM   #24
memphisskin
Impact Rookie
 
memphisskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 53
Posts: 960
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Reason #207 why I love living in the DMV, being able to listen to Doc Walker. He was saying it doesn't matter what kind of name or reputation they have, the question is can they produce?

That said, I have a hard time believing that Gibbs, Saunders & company aren't doing everything they can to fix this. Maybe it doesn't show in the results, but something has to give, and soon.
memphisskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 05:29 PM   #25
HOGTIMUS PRIME
Special Teams
 
HOGTIMUS PRIME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 101
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Casserly's singing the same tune a lot of us have been around here.

We've got to have a big body who can leap at the WR spot.
I guess he doesn't consider Portis a red zone threat?
HOGTIMUS PRIME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 06:17 PM   #26
Cowell
Impact Rookie
 
Cowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bluffton, South Carolina
Posts: 803
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOGTIMUS PRIME View Post
I guess he doesn't consider Portis a red zone threat?
I think he means, when JC drops back to throw Portis is not a red zone threat. Even though he really isn't on the ground anymore either but that's a whole different topic.
Cowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 07:20 PM   #27
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

This is somewhat OT, but Anthony Mix wasn't on the street. He was on the Giants practice squad. Any player on a team's practice squad is eligible to be signed to another team's 53 man roster. In recent years, we lost Robert McCune (Dolphins) and Buck Ortega (Browns) this way.

I also feel that our best chance of scoring is from 25-30 yards out (with our current offensive line). It gives those small receivers room to work (and run after the catch).
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 08:56 PM   #28
djnemo65
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
I don't know if you remember, but Ricky Sanders was a NE castoff. We know what he did afterwards with us.
Well if Mix turns out to be great he could solve this problem

Until then, however, we are going to continue to have trouble in the redzone for the aforementioned reasons.

I still contend that it would be worthwhile looking at a receiver in the first round. With our last three first round picks busting out (Howard, Westbrook, and Gardner) odds say we are due for HOF'er
djnemo65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 09:15 PM   #29
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

I'd like to see us take more shots between the 40s, but that also requires pass protection.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 09:28 PM   #30
21InOurHearts
Camp Scrub
 
21InOurHearts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Maryland, Originally VA.
Posts: 11
Re: Charley Casserly's Take on the skins Redzone Problems

Are there any big play receivers out there in the draft or free agency? I know Roy Williams wants out of Detroit but he wants to go back to Texas. Any chance of a second or third round guy falling to us? If so, who is out there?
__________________
"Football Is Easy if you're Crazy as Hell" Bo Jackson.
21InOurHearts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.54948 seconds with 10 queries