Trade down?

sandtrapjack · 04-22-2008, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Well, the draft trade value chart is horribly outdated, and any team that had a top 5 selection and turned down an offer for the 21st pick, a 2nd rounder, and a 7th probably needs to fire everyone involved. Especially since the chances of landing a stud at 21 are close to what they are at 5, and you wont be paying as much. Plus you get two extra picks.

Not outdated, I use the new draft chart which just came out in 2008.

SmootSmack · 04-22-2008, 10:20 AM

Wouldn't do it. Long alone is not more valuable than say Jackson and Sweed.

Stuck in TX · 04-22-2008, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Wouldn't do it. Long alone is not more valuable than say Jackson and Sweed.

REALLY??! This may be the "local talent love affair" that I have talking, but Chris Long looks really promising. I think he would be an asset to our line and I myself would give up those picks.

jsarno · 04-22-2008, 10:42 AM

For the record, I think Long is going to be a mega stud. He has the size, the demeanor, and the pedigree. If I were Miami, I'd already have a contract ready for this kid to sign.

04-22-2008, 10:20 AM	#2
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Trade down? Wouldn't do it. Long alone is not more valuable than say Jackson and Sweed. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

04-22-2008, 10:42 AM	#4
jsarno Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: 31 Spooner St. Age: 51 Posts: 9,534	Re: Trade down? For the record, I think Long is going to be a mega stud. He has the size, the demeanor, and the pedigree. If I were Miami, I'd already have a contract ready for this kid to sign. __________________ Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin

Trade down?

Locker Room Main Forum