Picking Kelly over Sweed

EEich · 05-01-2008, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Spanky

kelly runs better routes and is more proven as far as consistent, year to year, production

That's a ludicrous statement:
2006 6 catches for 90 yards and 1 TD
2007 79 catches for 1260 yards and 8 TDs

That's some year to year consistency for ya.

wilsowilso · 05-01-2008, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EEich

That's a ludicrous statement:
2006 6 catches for 90 yards and 1 TD
2007 79 catches for 1260 yards and 8 TDs

That's some year to year consistency for ya.

You got your stats wrong. Kelly as a true freshman caught 33 passes for 471 yards and two touchdowns. As Sophmore he caught 62 passes for 993 yards and ten touchdowns. This last year he caught 49 balls for 821 yards and nine touchdowns.

I think you put the Devin Thomas stats in there instead of Kelly's.

EEich · 05-02-2008, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

You got your stats wrong. Kelly as a true freshman caught 33 passes for 471 yards and two touchdowns. As Sophmore he caught 62 passes for 993 yards and ten touchdowns. This last year he caught 49 balls for 821 yards and nine touchdowns.

I think you put the Devin Thomas stats in there instead of Kelly's.

Yup... for some reason I had Thomas on my mind... sorry Spanky.

J. Spanky · 05-02-2008, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EEich

Yup... for some reason I had Thomas on my mind... sorry Spanky.

don't mention it

Ade Jimoh Fan Club · 05-02-2008, 10:08 AM

Kelly was the #1 WR on most rankings when the college football season ended. Then, somehow, through combine times and scores and rediculous media hype, he dropped down to anywhere between #3 and #8.

His slow 40 time is not a big deal IMO. There are a ton of examples of WR's who ran slow times but had crazy successful carreers (hello - Jerry Rice?). His hands are phenomenal and he plays big in big games. I don't frankly care how blazing fast he is if he doesn't catch the ball effectively - it'd be irrelevant.

He seemed very polished and articulate and intelligent during the news conference - and I think that's a sign of being mature. Seriously, when you think of all the "superstars" in the NFL, how many of them talk in horrible, ebonic english during press conferences or interviews? Not many at all. Leaders in the lockerroom need to be able to speak intelligently and clearly and smartly - if they want to be the face of the team. Kelly impressed me with all of this in his first press conference and i expect big things from him.

I'm actually more excited about him then Thomas, who in my mind has much more question marks.

Stuck in TX · 05-02-2008, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ade Jimoh Fan Club

Kelly was the #1 WR on most rankings when the college football season ended. Then, somehow, through combine times and scores and rediculous media hype, he dropped down to anywhere between #3 and #8.

His slow 40 time is not a big deal IMO. There are a ton of examples of WR's who ran slow times but had crazy successful carreers (hello - Jerry Rice?). His hands are phenomenal and he plays big in big games. I don't frankly care how blazing fast he is if he doesn't catch the ball effectively - it'd be irrelevant.

He seemed very polished and articulate and intelligent during the news conference - and I think that's a sign of being mature. Seriously, when you think of all the "superstars" in the NFL, how many of them talk in horrible, ebonic english during press conferences or interviews? Not many at all. Leaders in the lockerroom need to be able to speak intelligently and clearly and smartly - if they want to be the face of the team. Kelly impressed me with all of this in his first press conference and i expect big things from him.

I'm actually more excited about him then Thomas, who in my mind has much more question marks.

Yeah, Kelly should have gone in the 1st IMO. We are lucky b/c now he cant demand 1st round money. I just hope Thomas doesnt think we will automatically be ahead of Kelly on the depth chart. It will be a battle.

marius · 05-02-2008, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hooskins

On Redskins Radio, they said worked out Kelly alot. They actually brought out Campbell and made him throw to Kelly, which is apparently rare for workouts. Campbell and Zorn liked his ability to catch the fade in the endzone and were not concerned about his speed.

I understand that Campbell was very impressed with Kelly after throwing to him so this likely played a big role in the decision - it also bodes very well for their partnership in future seasons.

Campbell must be feeling pretty pleased with the moves made in the draft as he has a hell of a lot a toys to play with now. He has got to be excited at playing in this offense.

jsarno · 05-02-2008, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I remember reading that Kelly only dropped one ball in his career at OU.

Is that really true?

Is it possible to find a link on that. That would be amazing.

SmootSmack · 05-02-2008, 12:49 PM

Compares To: LARRY FITZGERALD-Arizona...Like Fitzgerald, Kelly takes advantage of his size and strength to break arm tackles rather than trying to get fancy with moves when trying to separate. Both have some of the best natural hands in the game, as Kelly was charted with only one dropped pass in the last two years.

NFL Events: Draft Player Profiles - Malcolm Kelly

marius · 05-02-2008, 12:51 PM

SmootSmack, you beat me to that by about 30 seconds. You internet ninja!

marius · 05-02-2008, 12:53 PM

Here is an interesting comparison I found while looking for the Kelly 1 dropped pass info:

Rookie Battles: Malcolm Kelly Vs Limas Sweed

jsarno · 05-02-2008, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Compares To: LARRY FITZGERALD-Arizona...Like Fitzgerald, Kelly takes advantage of his size and strength to break arm tackles rather than trying to get fancy with moves when trying to separate. Both have some of the best natural hands in the game, as Kelly was charted with only one dropped pass in the last two years.

NFL Events: Draft Player Profiles - Malcolm Kelly

That is awesome!!!!
A nice big WR (6'4") and he actually catches the ball. We totally need that in Washington.

12thMan · 05-02-2008, 01:07 PM

I'm totally happy with the draft. Man it would nice to see one of the newbies crack the starting line-up.

jsarno · 05-02-2008, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12thMan

I'm totally happy with the draft. Man it would nice to see one of the newbies crack the starting line-up.

I have no doubt that one of those two wr's will...and will be vital to our success.

GTripp0012 · 05-02-2008, 01:34 PM

I think Malcolm Kelly can be a very valuable player for us for a long time and DEFINATELY seems to be a good value pick at 51. Problem is that his speed issues do prevent him from having the potential to develop into a top of the line receiver.

Still, I'm happy we have him.

05-02-2008, 10:08 AM	#20
Ade Jimoh Fan Club Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 410	Re: Picking Kelly over Sweed Kelly was the #1 WR on most rankings when the college football season ended. Then, somehow, through combine times and scores and rediculous media hype, he dropped down to anywhere between #3 and #8. His slow 40 time is not a big deal IMO. There are a ton of examples of WR's who ran slow times but had crazy successful carreers (hello - Jerry Rice?). His hands are phenomenal and he plays big in big games. I don't frankly care how blazing fast he is if he doesn't catch the ball effectively - it'd be irrelevant. He seemed very polished and articulate and intelligent during the news conference - and I think that's a sign of being mature. Seriously, when you think of all the "superstars" in the NFL, how many of them talk in horrible, ebonic english during press conferences or interviews? Not many at all. Leaders in the lockerroom need to be able to speak intelligently and clearly and smartly - if they want to be the face of the team. Kelly impressed me with all of this in his first press conference and i expect big things from him. I'm actually more excited about him then Thomas, who in my mind has much more question marks.

05-02-2008, 12:49 PM	#24
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Picking Kelly over Sweed Compares To: LARRY FITZGERALD-Arizona...Like Fitzgerald, Kelly takes advantage of his size and strength to break arm tackles rather than trying to get fancy with moves when trying to separate. Both have some of the best natural hands in the game, as Kelly was charted with only one dropped pass in the last two years. NFL Events: Draft Player Profiles - Malcolm Kelly __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

05-02-2008, 12:51 PM	#25
marius Special Teams Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 136	Re: Picking Kelly over Sweed SmootSmack, you beat me to that by about 30 seconds. You internet ninja!

05-02-2008, 12:53 PM	#26
marius Special Teams Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 136	Re: Picking Kelly over Sweed Here is an interesting comparison I found while looking for the Kelly 1 dropped pass info: Rookie Battles: Malcolm Kelly Vs Limas Sweed

05-02-2008, 01:07 PM	#28
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: Picking Kelly over Sweed I'm totally happy with the draft. Man it would nice to see one of the newbies crack the starting line-up.

05-02-2008, 01:34 PM	#30
GTripp0012 Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evanston, IL Age: 36 Posts: 15,994	Re: Picking Kelly over Sweed I think Malcolm Kelly can be a very valuable player for us for a long time and DEFINATELY seems to be a good value pick at 51. Problem is that his speed issues do prevent him from having the potential to develop into a top of the line receiver. Still, I'm happy we have him. __________________ according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Picking Kelly over Sweed

Locker Room Main Forum