Retrospect: Should we have IR'd Malcolm Kelly?

Dirtbag59 · 10-07-2008, 03:03 PM

I've actually wanted him on IR for a while. Maybe bring back Anthony Mix for depth or at least find a way to use Fred Davis more, I mean for God's sake the guy used to play receiever, maybe you can split him out near the 10 yard line.

However with Kelly I feel it's better for the long run if we just give him a year to heal and then hopefully he'll end up being the next Rocky McIntosh. Then again Rocky played a little during his Rookie year but still. Actually I think the success with Rocky is one of the main reasons the Redskins decided to draft Kelly in spite of his bad knees. Either way Kelly needs to be brought along slowly.

10-07-2008, 03:03 PM	#16
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 39 Posts: 14,750	Re: Retrospect: Should we have IR'd Malcolm Kelly? I've actually wanted him on IR for a while. Maybe bring back Anthony Mix for depth or at least find a way to use Fred Davis more, I mean for God's sake the guy used to play receiever, maybe you can split him out near the 10 yard line. However with Kelly I feel it's better for the long run if we just give him a year to heal and then hopefully he'll end up being the next Rocky McIntosh. Then again Rocky played a little during his Rookie year but still. Actually I think the success with Rocky is one of the main reasons the Redskins decided to draft Kelly in spite of his bad knees. Either way Kelly needs to be brought along slowly. __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG

Retrospect: Should we have IR'd Malcolm Kelly?

Locker Room Main Forum