|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-03-2008, 06:26 PM | #16 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Quote:
You also have to start Jansen (as opposed to Heyer) on the other side, but at least that's not the side that causes those sack/strip turnovers. It's a matchup that a defense can exploit on us, and if the Lions can exploit it, I'm confident that every other team in the league also can. Randle El's not the deep threat can replace Moss, but obviously, we can still create big plays in the passing game without Moss. The loss of Moss would hurt us most because the opponent wouldn't have to keep a safety deep and totally out of the running game, but Cooley could still get open, and so could Randle El. Plus, it would open up a place in the starting lineup to get some critical playing time for one of our younger guys (probably Devin Thomas).
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
Advertisements |
11-03-2008, 06:31 PM | #17 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 304
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Yeah... Heyer at LT was pretty bad. He blew quite a few plays. Most of the pressure and sacks were right on his side/his gaps.
__________________
DaveyFoSho
|
11-03-2008, 06:44 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: commonwealth of va
Posts: 795
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
if samuels does'nt play,we lose.it's that simple.heyer sucks,and JC will feel it all nite if CS is'nt playing.i think we'll have a hard time winning without santanna too!
|
11-03-2008, 08:06 PM | #19 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Quote:
|
|
11-03-2008, 08:14 PM | #20 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Samuels. I don't trust Stephon Heyer at all to protect Campbell's backside. He was damn near seriously injured last time we played these Steelers last preseason when Heyer was playing on that side. With Moss, we have a proven James Thrash and a rookie Devin Thomas with great potential. We also have Chris Cooley and Fred Davis. So, I'd rather have Samuels in the game more than Moss.
|
11-03-2008, 08:22 PM | #21 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
They will both start
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
11-03-2008, 08:50 PM | #22 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 241
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Yeah just saw that, thank god!
|
11-03-2008, 08:59 PM | #23 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: long island
Posts: 898
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
I gotta go with Samuels cause simply put if we can run, We can beat anyone.
__________________
Hail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
11-04-2008, 09:02 AM | #24 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 70
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Id rather have the gamebreaker in the lineup. Is it me or does Chris get a hell of alot of penalties? Every false start and hold was him last night.
__________________
"It's almost like we play a kids game for a king's ransom, and if you dont take it seriously enough, one day you're gonna say, oh I could have did this or I could have did that" Sean Taylor |
11-04-2008, 12:03 PM | #25 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
I give both guys credit for toughing it out last night, but they were clearly limited with their injuries. Hopefully the BYE will help.
|
11-04-2008, 12:57 PM | #26 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 4,628
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Campbell looked lost without Moss out on the field...almost like he didn't know what to do with the ball. That is, when he had time to decide. Both Samuels and Jansen got roughed up last night.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things... “WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris |
11-04-2008, 06:34 PM | #27 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Who's More Important: Moss or Samuels
Samuels. The game is won mostly up front. Without good tackle play you don't run and you don't pass, making Moss superfluous.
Sadly, last night, we did not get that good tackle play.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|