|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-29-2008, 09:30 PM | #16 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 38
Posts: 549
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
We seem to be on the same page all the time, man.
__________________
Gonzaga College High School '04 Loyola College '08 |
|
Advertisements |
12-29-2008, 09:33 PM | #17 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
It's the Jesuit education.
__________________
Tardy |
12-29-2008, 09:37 PM | #18 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
But ultimately, I agree with you. If we're going to struggle in the first quarter of every game anyway, might as well go three and out with Betts carrying the ball, and gradually move to Portis as the plays become more and more decisive.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
12-29-2008, 09:42 PM | #19 | |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
Look at Mark Rypien's performance when the Hog's were in their prime and.......not. That may be the kind of protection required for JC to have success.
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
12-29-2008, 09:43 PM | #20 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
I would love Sproles as a complimentary/3rd down back and KR/PR. We also should draft a hybrid back like Brian Leonard a few years back from Rutgers who can play some HB and also have the power to be a short yardage threat.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
12-29-2008, 11:29 PM | #21 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queensbury, NY
Posts: 273
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
HAIL!!
__________________
"Baseball is what we were, football is what we have become" |
|
12-29-2008, 11:41 PM | #22 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
extremely basic schemes offense and defense
we're not enough of a powerhouse that you can do what you want, no matter what it hasn't been that type of NFL in years |
12-30-2008, 08:21 AM | #23 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
12-30-2008, 09:51 AM | #24 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 896
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Thanks for bringing up Sproles. I was afraid of getting blasted by everyone on the site. I've wanted Darren for a couple of years now. He's the best screen pass runner in the NFL. Which is perfect for the west coast offense.
|
12-30-2008, 10:10 AM | #25 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Don't ever worry about that. If you feel like you have a legitimate idea that you can convey intelligently (especially about addressing a need with a legit player in this case), don't be a afraid. This site wouldn't exist without opinions and speculation. Someone is always going to disagree. If they didn't this place would be pretty boring.
__________________
Tardy |
12-30-2008, 10:56 AM | #26 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
I really wanted to replace Betts last year with Steve Slaton or any of the many talented RBs in last year's draft. There were lots of good backs available in the middle rounds. This year's draft, not so much. Several of you have brought it up, but Portis isn't getting any younger, and he's got a lot of mileage, not to mention he normally misses some games due to injury. He needs an heir apparent. I think Darren Sproles would be the ideal guy for the Skins, but I don't think the Chargers will let him get away. They've already lost one great back to free agency, and they have a smart front office who understands LT can't shoulder the load himself and won't always be carrying the rock for them as effectively as he has. Steven Jackson, Brandon Jacobs, and Marion Barber are going to be garnering all the attention and high dollar contracts. Maybe, the Skins can pry away Sproles. If not, I wonder if the Giants' Derrick Ward would fit in nicely. He's the speedy alternative to BJ in NY. And he's been very productive at times. The Skins do definitely need to bolster the RB corp somehow though. |
|
12-30-2008, 11:15 AM | #27 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Quote:
Moreover, I'm not the only person saying that the offense is predictable. JLC "reported" that defenders for other teams (e.g., Ed Reed) think the offense is predictable. Last edited by Sheriff Gonna Getcha; 12-30-2008 at 11:35 AM. |
|
01-03-2009, 11:44 PM | #28 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
Thanks for covering while I was away SGG
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
01-04-2009, 01:28 AM | #29 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
I don't think any Skins' fan should get too hyped about Sproles. First, no way does SD let him go. LT seems to be breaking down and SD probably should have traded him and kept Turner: they won't make a similar mistake w/ another dynamite backfield threat.
Secondly, I'd venture to say Sproles wouldn't have much success here. I say that because our run-blocking, even at it's best, is nothing compared to SD. Our old fogies can push off the line a few yards when they're very fresh but rarely make blocks down field, which is why CP doesn't break the big ones anymore. Sure he can grit 7 or 8 yards w/ defenders battering him but there is a certain number of yards from the LOS where it's just CP facing several defenders and our lineman are nowhere in sight. At no time was this more evident than in SF, when I repeatedly saw the o-line give up on blocks/plays while CP was still on his feet. Heyer especially has a knack for giving up on plays, while Rabach/Thomas just don't seem to have what it takes to block DTs or really aggressive LBs. Not to get completely off subject but our line regressed so much this season to the point of looking lazy, slow and very incompetent IMHO. This is a very sad group at this point. Anyway, the whole point is Sproles would struggle mightily to break anything big w/ our line. To the bigger debate of how to get more dynamic in our backfield, i just see that another/different RB is the answer. Again, speedsters and scat-backs just won't have success until we almost completely gut the line. Have we forgotten that CP was the premier scat-back when we traded for him? To his extreme credit he's become a GD bruiser, but really it's what he had to do (to have success as a Skin). If anything, we should go the opposite direction of Sproles (until the line is completely recycled) and grab a great big bruiser. Honestly I'd hoped Betts would become this guy more each year, adding more bulk and strength to pound defenses whenever CP is out of the game. Betts is not that player. He's a Portis lite as someone said.
__________________
24-34 |
01-04-2009, 01:35 AM | #30 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Smoot Lays the Smack Down: WAS @ SF
RB may be something we draft this year, especially if we can trade Betts somehow and grab another draft pick. Anyway, if the FO is smart it will look for a Brandon Jacobs type, not a Sproles type... unless of course we make massive changes to the o-line (like replace Kendell, Rabach and obviously Jansen/Heyer at RT). As i said in another thread i just don't see o-line getting the focus it needs this year so... i'm hoping for a new bruiser in the backfield that "replaces" Ladell.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|