Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Scott · 01-11-2009, 09:03 PM

3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...

The Goat · 01-11-2009, 09:06 PM

All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.

saden1 · 01-11-2009, 09:14 PM

Means nothing beyond the fact that the unexpected can happen. My money is on the Ravens to win it all (Big Ben + Ed Reed = INT) but then again I remember what happened last year.

SFREDSKIN · 01-11-2009, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.

Wrong. I think Baltimore pulls the upset.

Trample the Elderly · 01-11-2009, 09:23 PM

I don't think it means anything.

Now let's go Arizona. Go out and beat the brakes of the Filth-a-delphia Yardbirds. Better yet win the Superbowl. He he he. Yeah Right!

skinsfan69 · 01-11-2009, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

Yup , the Eagles beat the Giants today now the #1,2,and 3 seed of the NFC are all out which bows well fro the AFC.We were out played but more important we were out coached today AR beat Coughlin all the way around the board.I'll be rooting for the Steelers becuase McNabb is so classless I just can't root for him.

The QB sneak call was horrible. You've got Jacobs back there and you run Eli over Jacobs??

Why the hate for McNabb??

DynamiteRave · 01-11-2009, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.

Hopefully the Ravens win. Anyone but the Eagles. Anyone.

The Goat · 01-11-2009, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Wrong. I think Baltimore pulls the upset.

I hope you and Saden are right... personally I just want the trophy to stay w/ the NFC at this point.

Dirtbag59 · 01-11-2009, 09:45 PM

Q: Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

A: Iz Dangers

SFREDSKIN · 01-11-2009, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

I hope you and Saden are right... personally I just want the trophy to stay w/ the NFC at this point.

My prediction is Baltimore vs Arizona in the SB. I hope I'm right.

skinsfan69 · 01-11-2009, 10:23 PM

Baltimore got some real lucky breaks against Tenn and I think their corners are suspect. I don't think they beat Pittsburgh at Pittsburgh.

Defensewins · 01-11-2009, 10:47 PM

When it was clear Steelers were going to win, CBS Sports game telecast showed an interesting graphic near the end of the Steelers v Chargers game.

Top three defenses in NFL in 2008 (ranking was based on total Defense):
1) Pittsburgh Steelers
2) Baltimore Ravens
3) Philadelphia Eagles

Then Joe Buck says, "how interesting the top three defenses in 2008 in total defense are represented as three of the finalists for the superbowl."

This was a CBS stat so dont ask me where they got their figures.

This is more relevant to who should win and how teams win then trying to make some kind of logic out of the first post in this thread about team beat A and team b...and trying to make some kind of logic out that. you can't.

SmootSmack · 01-11-2009, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Defensewins

When it was clear Steelers were going to win, CBS Sports game telecast showed an interesting graphic near the end of the Steelers v Chargers game.

Top three defenses in NFL in 2008 (ranking was based on total Defense):
1) Pittsburgh Steelers
2) Baltimore Ravens
3) Philadelphia Eagles

Then Joe Buck says, "how interesting the top three defenses in 2008 in total defense are represented as three of the finalists for the superbowl."

This was a CBS stat so dont ask me where they got their figures.

This is more relevant to who should win and how teams win then trying to make some kind of logic out of the first post in this thread about team beat A and team b...and trying to make some kind of logic out that. you can't.

What was Joe Buck doing talking during a CBS telecast?

saden1 · 01-11-2009, 11:24 PM

They don't say defense win championships for nothing. Even the Rams back in 1999 had a great defense (ranked #4 in the league).

Defensewins · 01-11-2009, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

What was Joe Buck doing talking during a CBS telecast?

Your right it was not Joe Buck. It was who ever was partnered with Phil Simms during that game.?.?

01-11-2009, 09:03 PM	#16
Scott Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 177	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? 3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...

01-11-2009, 09:06 PM	#17
The Goat Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 5,662	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck. __________________ 24-34

01-11-2009, 09:14 PM	#18
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? Means nothing beyond the fact that the unexpected can happen. My money is on the Ravens to win it all (Big Ben + Ed Reed = INT) but then again I remember what happened last year. __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

01-11-2009, 09:23 PM	#20
Trample the Elderly Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Three Chopt Virginia Age: 47 Posts: 2,906	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? I don't think it means anything. Now let's go Arizona. Go out and beat the brakes of the Filth-a-delphia Yardbirds. Better yet win the Superbowl. He he he. Yeah Right!

01-11-2009, 09:45 PM	#24
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 39 Posts: 14,750	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? Q: Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? A: Iz Dangers __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG

01-11-2009, 10:23 PM	#26
skinsfan69 Living Legend Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 17,333	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? Baltimore got some real lucky breaks against Tenn and I think their corners are suspect. I don't think they beat Pittsburgh at Pittsburgh.

01-11-2009, 10:47 PM	#27
Defensewins Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 3,749	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? When it was clear Steelers were going to win, CBS Sports game telecast showed an interesting graphic near the end of the Steelers v Chargers game. Top three defenses in NFL in 2008 (ranking was based on total Defense): 1) Pittsburgh Steelers 2) Baltimore Ravens 3) Philadelphia Eagles Then Joe Buck says, "how interesting the top three defenses in 2008 in total defense are represented as three of the finalists for the superbowl." This was a CBS stat so dont ask me where they got their figures. This is more relevant to who should win and how teams win then trying to make some kind of logic out of the first post in this thread about team beat A and team b...and trying to make some kind of logic out that. you can't.

01-11-2009, 11:24 PM	#29
saden1 MVP Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 45 Posts: 10,069	Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? They don't say defense win championships for nothing. Even the Rams back in 1999 had a great defense (ranked #4 in the league). __________________ "The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins

Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Locker Room Main Forum