Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes

MTK · 03-25-2009, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

I think Cutler being our QB is only slightly more likely than Matty lining up at QB1 with me and Smootsmack stacked in the I behind him for the Redskins. Give it up peeps.

And people think the Skins offense sucked last year... wait til they get a load of us!

53Fan · 03-25-2009, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

VC is the GM, and conducting deals. JZ has not shown anywhere near the same deftness with skilled adjucation of elicited facts. He was asked a straightforward question, and gave a straightforward answer.

people just gotta let it go.

I don't doubt what Zorn says at all. One of the criticisms about him was he was too forthcoming with his honesty about things.

53Fan · 03-25-2009, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

And people think the Skins offense sucked last year... wait til they get a load of us!

We better have a damn good line.

MTK · 03-25-2009, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

We better have a damn good line.

Don't worry I'm known for having a quick release

Daseal · 03-25-2009, 08:41 PM

Matty, perhaps my wording wasn't as accurate as it could have been. Since I don't know the names of the sources, nor does anyone else, it's hard to quantify which are good and which are bad. But there were multiple reports of league sources. I heard the same things on ESPN, Sirius NFL radio, and a quick google search brought up several articles.

53Fan · 03-25-2009, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Don't worry I'm known for having a quick release

I'm not gonna say a word.

WaldSkins · 03-25-2009, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Don't worry I'm known for having a quick release

That's what she said.

hooskins · 03-25-2009, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waldskins

that's what she said.

zing!

GridIron26 · 03-25-2009, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

No, we can't kill the Cutler talk now. A head coach lying about interest in a player -- UNPOSSIBLE. The NFL is full of smoke screens. If our FO got a decent chance at Cutler, I bet they'd make the move in a heart beat. Also, read his comments closely, no where did he say we wouldn't be interested in Cutler. He said we're not 'asking' about him.

I think the chances of us getting Cutler are slim -- but I don't think we're out of the picture by any stretch of the imagination.

I wouldn't blame you for doubting Redskins FO, but if you are right; we trade for Cutler with our picks (obviously we won't trade JC due to Zorn's comments).. Cutler then would be riding bench as #2 QB because Zorn basically said that JC is our starter..

celts32 · 03-25-2009, 10:46 PM

What team would acknowledge interest in another QB knowing that if the trade doesn't pan out they would create a QB drama situation with thier current starter? We all know the chances of Cutler being traded anywhere are low let alone to DC...but to think that the skins are not interested just because Zorn or Vinny say so is gullable and laughable. The fact alone that the redskins have not made any contract offer to JC means that they are not completely sold on him long term so if that's the case wouldn't it be reasonable to think that they would at least look into what it would take to land Cutler? The skins may very well not be interested in Cutler, but my point is that they would deny interest regardless.

vallin21 · 03-25-2009, 10:50 PM

Cutler's going to the Jets (not the Redskins) on draft day. BANK ON IT!!

celts32 · 03-25-2009, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GridIron26

I wouldn't blame you for doubting Redskins FO, but if you are right; we trade for Cutler with our picks (obviously we won't trade JC due to Zorn's comments).. Cutler then would be riding bench as #2 QB because Zorn basically said that JC is our starter..

I am sure Zorn meant JC is the starter over the other QB's currently on the roster. And besides if the unlikely Cutler trade took place then Campbell would either be traded as part of that deal or he would be shipped somewhere else in a seperate trade for a draft pick. They would never acquire Cutler to ride the bench and they would never ask Campbell to stay and ride the bench behind Cutler.

tryfuhl · 03-25-2009, 11:04 PM

We weren't going to get Jason Taylor or Albert Haynesworth either.

But in all honesty, we're not getting Cutler.

tryfuhl · 03-25-2009, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Don't worry I'm known for having a quick release

My condolences to your woman :p

GridIron26 · 03-25-2009, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celts32

I am sure Zorn meant JC is the starter over the other QB's currently on the roster. And besides if the unlikely Cutler trade took place then Campbell would either be traded as part of that deal or he would be shipped somewhere else in a seperate trade for a draft pick. They would never acquire Cutler to ride the bench and they would never ask Campbell to stay and ride the bench behind Cutler.

Zorn might meant that way, but I doubt it..

That's exactly what I'm trying to say.. I find it hard to believe that Redskins are willing to waste our picks, especially when we have pressing needs to fill in positions such as RT, DE and LB..

03-25-2009, 08:41 PM	#20
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 8,341	Re: Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes Matty, perhaps my wording wasn't as accurate as it could have been. Since I don't know the names of the sources, nor does anyone else, it's hard to quantify which are good and which are bad. But there were multiple reports of league sources. I heard the same things on ESPN, Sirius NFL radio, and a quick google search brought up several articles. __________________ Best. Player. Available.

03-25-2009, 10:46 PM	#25
celts32 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 53 Posts: 2,665	Re: Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes What team would acknowledge interest in another QB knowing that if the trade doesn't pan out they would create a QB drama situation with thier current starter? We all know the chances of Cutler being traded anywhere are low let alone to DC...but to think that the skins are not interested just because Zorn or Vinny say so is gullable and laughable. The fact alone that the redskins have not made any contract offer to JC means that they are not completely sold on him long term so if that's the case wouldn't it be reasonable to think that they would at least look into what it would take to land Cutler? The skins may very well not be interested in Cutler, but my point is that they would deny interest regardless. __________________ Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub

03-25-2009, 10:50 PM	#26
vallin21 The Starter Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,177	Re: Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes Cutler's going to the Jets (not the Redskins) on draft day. BANK ON IT!!

03-25-2009, 11:04 PM	#28
tryfuhl Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 41 Posts: 12,514	Re: Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes We weren't going to get Jason Taylor or Albert Haynesworth either. But in all honesty, we're not getting Cutler.

Zorn says no on Cutler, talks Haynesworth, Hall and '09 hopes

Locker Room Main Forum