Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Frank Herzog: The Redskins are just bad

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2004, 09:23 AM   #16
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,608
The bigger mistake was hiring Marty in the first place. Snyder isn't the kind of owner that can give 100% control to someone like he did with Marty.

With Gibbs he at least feels like he has a say in things, even though he's probably nothing more than Gibbs' personal ATM.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-05-2004, 09:46 AM   #17
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
Antonio Gates? Donnie Edwards? SD has a lot of talent and are vastly improved on the O line and D line from last year.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 12:53 PM   #18
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Brees has done alright this year, as has R. caldwell...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 01:16 PM   #19
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
The only thing owed Spurrier is a kick in the arse! Pulllease! Gibbs won the Super Bowl in his second year as an NFL coach, Spurrier headed back to the golf course after his. The two names should not even be used in the same sentence. Gibbs is the best ever. He will fix this team. It takes a little longer than a month to fix 12 years of ineptitude.
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 03:42 PM   #20
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
I think what Herzog means is that Gibbs is finding out how hard it is to coach this bunch of no account stiffs and SS had no chance with these guys. The difference is that Gibbs, Bugel, et al wont put up with the players bullsh.. like SS did. There will be no mutiny on this team because anyone that tries will be out on his a$$.

Hopefully Gibbs can find a way to make this sorry bunch into winners.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 07:59 PM   #21
CrazyCanuck
Serenity Now
 
CrazyCanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32
The only thing owed Spurrier is a kick in the arse! Pulllease! Gibbs won the Super Bowl in his second year as an NFL coach, Spurrier headed back to the golf course after his. The two names should not even be used in the same sentence. Gibbs is the best ever. He will fix this team. It takes a little longer than a month to fix 12 years of ineptitude.
Well said. I never hated Spurrier I just felt he was overmatched. But to mention Spurrier in the same sentence as Gibbs is ludicrous.
CrazyCanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 08:06 PM   #22
BIGREDSKINFAN63
Special Teams
 
BIGREDSKINFAN63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: bassett-va
Age: 61
Posts: 289
Quote:
Originally Posted by aehs77
I think our biggest mistake was firing marty.
i would have never fired marty to hire steve"i have a 5 o clock tee time"spurrier.say what you want too,marty has forgotten a whole hell of a lot more about being a pro coach that ss ever thought about learning.when it comes to hiring joe gibbs over marty,i'll take 3 shiny lombardis over two almost trips to the big game anyday.
__________________
"7 days without the redskins, makes one weak!!!"
BIGREDSKINFAN63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 08:19 PM   #23
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
What Frank Herzog is saying has nothing to do with a comparison between Gibbs and Spurrier. Frank Herzog is calling out the players as the cause for the poor performance in the last season and a quarter. And he has hit the nail squarely on the head.

I know that lots of people here are blindly in love with players who wear Redskins uniforms - even if it is only in the pre-season and against scrubs from other teams - but it's the players who lose the games and it's the players who make the mistakes. When you watch game films, there is not one coach who has ever blown a pass coverage or dropped a first down pass or fumbled or jumped offside or hit aman out of bounds giving the opponent a first down. All of the people who do that have numbers on their backs; coaches don't.

Sadly, some of Skins' the most publicized players are the ones who make the mistakes and that causes fans a lot of angst because they are conditioned by the "kiss-ass Washington sports media" to believe that these people are heroes of mythic proportion. They're not.

When you assemble a team, you have to look at player "potential" as one aspect of the roster you keep. But if you temporarily FORGET potential and look strictly as performance, this team has a whole lot of really ordinary players who are good enough to prevent losing by three TDs on any given weekend - but not good enough to win more often than they lose. That's harsh. It also happens to be demonstrably correct.

These players who are just good enough to keep their losses close are making Joe Gibbs a less successful coach than he has been in the past - just as they did to Steve Spurrier before that and Marty before that...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2004, 10:10 PM   #24
DirtBagZ
Special Teams
 
DirtBagZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 481
sportscurmudgeon - that is by far the best post I have read on this board. No emotion just the unpleasant truth. I have mentioned this before that the Redskins are a "Paper Tiger".

Year after year we hear about how talented the Redskins are yet the ugly truth is one, yes one playoff appearance in the last decade and a dismal 13 losses in the last 14 games against the Cowboys. There is practically an entire generation of young Redskins fans who do not know the joy of beating Dallas. Sadly your commentary and Frank Herzog's remark reflect the state of the team.
DirtBagZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 12:02 AM   #25
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daseal
Antonio Gates? Donnie Edwards? SD has a lot of talent and are vastly improved on the O line and D line from last year.
They are improved over last year (largely because their roster is so young), but their roster is still the worst in the league. Name me a team with a worse roster.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 12:04 AM   #26
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
The bigger mistake was hiring Marty in the first place. Snyder isn't the kind of owner that can give 100% control to someone like he did with Marty.

With Gibbs he at least feels like he has a say in things, even though he's probably nothing more than Gibbs' personal ATM.
I don't think the decision to hire Marty was a bad one. We were better under Marty than we were under Spurrier. With the exception of his tenure in SD, Marty has been very successful in the league and I don't think anyone could produce miracles in San Diego (save the Lord himself).
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 12:08 AM   #27
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGREDSKINFAN63
i would have never fired marty to hire steve"i have a 5 o clock tee time"spurrier.say what you want too,marty has forgotten a whole hell of a lot more about being a pro coach that ss ever thought about learning.when it comes to hiring joe gibbs over marty,i'll take 3 shiny lombardis over two almost trips to the big game anyday.
I agree. I think at first, I would have understood if they took Spurrier over Marty, but our team was obviously headed in the right direction at the end of Martys run, it was just like Gibbs first year so I hear, 0-5 , finish 8-8.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 03:22 AM   #28
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Quote:
They are improved over last year (largely because their roster is so young), but their roster is still the worst in the league. Name me a team with a worse roster.
49ers... maybe the cards (since shipp and boldin are out), and possibly the bears... miami and baltimore on offense...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2004, 09:31 AM   #29
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramseyfan
I don't think the decision to hire Marty was a bad one. We were better under Marty than we were under Spurrier. With the exception of his tenure in SD, Marty has been very successful in the league and I don't think anyone could produce miracles in San Diego (save the Lord himself).
My point was Marty was a terrible fit here. It was the old square peg through the circle hole. He is a quality coach, it just wasn't going to work here.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.62084 seconds with 10 queries