NFL on Fox: Has the Game Passed Gibbs By?

cpayne5 · 10-10-2004, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daseal

It takes some time to accrew enough film to predict trends. I'd say at least 3-4 weeks worth of it. Preferrably more than that.

Wilbon on some 'skins show with George Michael said he was in the Browns locker room and even they said they knew what was coming. The panel also seemed to agree that Brunnell is doing a horrible job.

They also said that back in the '80s, the other teams knew what play was coming then, too, but that the Skins executed to perfection which made the plays work.

monk81 · 10-10-2004, 09:29 PM

Even if the Redskin offense is so predictible consider this...without the stupid fumbles, dropped passes and poor clock management the Redskins had an opportunity to win the last 3 games....the Redskins BEAT THEMSELVES!!!!!

sportscurmudgeon · 10-11-2004, 01:05 AM

I believe the Skins' offense totaled 107 yards against the Ravens.

So does this mean:

a. Mike Nolan outcoached Joe Gibbs?

b. Mark Brunell is a stiff?

c. Clinton Portis was a product of the Denver system?

d. Rod Gardner decided to go easy on the Ravens after their loss last Monday night?

e. The Redskins OL is not very good?

I'll take "e" thank you...

Gmanc711 · 10-11-2004, 01:06 AM

I would say B and E. Portis wasent a product of the system, but my god he has been dissapointing so far.

That Guy · 10-11-2004, 04:11 AM

I'd vote for B and E... i was watching the run blocking this game, i saw jones block one guy for a few seconds and then just give up or not follow through...

really a bit miffed right now...

SkinsRock · 10-11-2004, 12:16 PM

B and E, obviously. As for the "they knew what was coming" comments, at the end of the game, our D knew that they were going to keep giving it to Jamal, and still couldn't stop them.....No, I am NOT blaming this loss on the defense, just pointing out that it can be done against a formidable D.

10-11-2004, 01:05 AM	#18
sportscurmudgeon Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,159	I believe the Skins' offense totaled 107 yards against the Ravens. So does this mean: a. Mike Nolan outcoached Joe Gibbs? b. Mark Brunell is a stiff? c. Clinton Portis was a product of the Denver system? d. Rod Gardner decided to go easy on the Ravens after their loss last Monday night? e. The Redskins OL is not very good? I'll take "e" thank you... __________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports...

10-11-2004, 01:06 AM	#19
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	I would say B and E. Portis wasent a product of the system, but my god he has been dissapointing so far. __________________ #21

10-10-2004, 09:29 PM	#17
monk81 The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: TEXAS Posts: 2,029	Even if the Redskin offense is so predictible consider this...without the stupid fumbles, dropped passes and poor clock management the Redskins had an opportunity to win the last 3 games....the Redskins BEAT THEMSELVES!!!!!

10-11-2004, 04:11 AM	#20
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	I'd vote for B and E... i was watching the run blocking this game, i saw jones block one guy for a few seconds and then just give up or not follow through... really a bit miffed right now...

10-11-2004, 12:16 PM	#21
SkinsRock Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Crofton, MD Age: 55 Posts: 907	B and E, obviously. As for the "they knew what was coming" comments, at the end of the game, our D knew that they were going to keep giving it to Jamal, and still couldn't stop them.....No, I am NOT blaming this loss on the defense, just pointing out that it can be done against a formidable D.

NFL on Fox: Has the Game Passed Gibbs By?

Locker Room Main Forum