Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?

WaldSkins · 10-09-2009, 09:30 PM

Randy Thomas to the IR

SFREDSKIN · 10-09-2009, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WaldSkins

Randy Thomas to the IR

Already in it. How about Wynn? He's been inactive for 4 weeks.

GTripp0012 · 10-09-2009, 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Already in it. How about Wynn? He's been inactive for 4 weeks.

Wynn is what I was thinking.

There's plenty of people who won't make it through the season. Smoot, Aldridge, Batiste, Henson possibly among them. But Wynn has been inactive every week, and I think he'll be the one to go this week. And it has a lot to do with the play of Daniels, I think.

Remember though, that Wynn's entire salary is guaranteed for the year, so he's paid for 17 weeks whether he ever plays a snap or not.

53Fan · 10-09-2009, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redskins5044

Montgomery to IR

I agree. He's been inactive because of injury hasn't he? With the guys we have I don't see him playing alot this year. Besides, Golston is Blache's guy.

Paintrain · 10-09-2009, 10:16 PM

Either Wynn, Henson or Monty to the IR.

WaldSkins · 10-09-2009, 10:20 PM

How bout Wynn AND Betts

SmootSmack · 10-09-2009, 11:51 PM

I would think Wynn or Alridge. Wynn seems more expendable particularly with Jarmon starting to come along, but wiith Montgomery out at least two more weeks and Griffin possibly out this SUnday (and maybe longer) they might need to start looking at Daniels playing more minutes inside...so does that mean Wynn is activated? Probably not actually.

I could see them possibly cutting Alridge and then hoping to re-sign him once they cut Pakulak. But I suspect one reason they might be trying out all these running backs is in case they cut Alridge but are unable to re-sign him.

GMScud · 10-09-2009, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I would think Wynn or Alridge. Wynn seems more expendable particularly with Jarmon starting to come along, but wiith Montgomery out at least two more weeks and Griffin possibly out this SUnday (and maybe longer) they might need to start looking at Daniels playing more minutes inside...so does that mean Wynn is activated? Probably not actually.

I could see them possibly cutting Alridge and then hoping to re-sign him once they cut Pakulak. But I suspect one reason they might be trying out all these running backs is in case they cut Alridge but are unable to re-sign him.

I don't understand why Wynn made the 53 man if he's going to be inactive every week. If we're going to keep a guy only to have him inactive on game day, why not a young talent we're trying to develop (a la Rinehart last year)?? No point on having a guy in the twilight of his career on the inactive list every damn Sunday.

SFREDSKIN · 10-10-2009, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

I don't understand why Wynn made the 53 man if he's going to be inactive every week. If we're going to keep a guy only to have him inactive on game day, why not a young talent we're trying to develop (a la Rinehart last year)?? No point on having a guy in the twilight of his career on the inactive list every damn Sunday.

Could have had Rob Jackson on the roster instead.

mrreddman · 10-10-2009, 10:04 AM

Told you guys from the day we signed him..Wynn sucks and was a wasted roster spot. Cut him now please.

CultBrennan59 · 10-10-2009, 01:29 PM

hopefully wynn

WaldSkins · 10-10-2009, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Could have had Rob Jackson on the roster instead.

Or Dixon

KLHJ2 · 10-10-2009, 02:33 PM

I think that Dan and Vinny are reading this thread waiting to see the consensus after about 50 replies before they make their decision today. Maybe the mods can help them out and add a pole because the suspense is killing me.

JLee9718 · 10-10-2009, 02:43 PM

I would cut Wynn.

JGisLordOfTheRings · 10-10-2009, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry

I think that Dan and Vinny are reading this thread waiting to see the consensus after about 50 replies before they make their decision today. Maybe the mods can help them out and add a pole because the suspense is killing me.

Probably true.

Thread needs poll obv

10-09-2009, 09:30 PM	#16
WaldSkins Playmaker Join Date: May 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 41 Posts: 2,726	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? Randy Thomas to the IR __________________ "I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown

10-09-2009, 10:16 PM	#20
Paintrain Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 54 Posts: 5,006	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? Either Wynn, Henson or Monty to the IR. __________________ Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman

10-09-2009, 10:20 PM	#21
WaldSkins Playmaker Join Date: May 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 41 Posts: 2,726	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? How bout Wynn AND Betts __________________ "I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown

10-09-2009, 11:51 PM	#22
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? I would think Wynn or Alridge. Wynn seems more expendable particularly with Jarmon starting to come along, but wiith Montgomery out at least two more weeks and Griffin possibly out this SUnday (and maybe longer) they might need to start looking at Daniels playing more minutes inside...so does that mean Wynn is activated? Probably not actually. I could see them possibly cutting Alridge and then hoping to re-sign him once they cut Pakulak. But I suspect one reason they might be trying out all these running backs is in case they cut Alridge but are unable to re-sign him. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

10-10-2009, 10:04 AM	#25
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? Told you guys from the day we signed him..Wynn sucks and was a wasted roster spot. Cut him now please.

10-10-2009, 01:29 PM	#26
CultBrennan59 Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 6,526	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? hopefully wynn

10-10-2009, 02:33 PM	#28
KLHJ2 Inactive Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: DC Metro Area Age: 46 Posts: 5,829	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? I think that Dan and Vinny are reading this thread waiting to see the consensus after about 50 replies before they make their decision today. Maybe the mods can help them out and add a pole because the suspense is killing me. Last edited by KLHJ2; 10-10-2009 at 02:46 PM.

10-10-2009, 02:43 PM	#29
JLee9718 Impact Rookie Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 573	Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak? I would cut Wynn.

Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?

Locker Room Main Forum